These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

694 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16364445)

  • 1. Genetically modified plants and food hypersensitivity diseases: usage and implications of experimental models for risk assessment.
    Prescott VE; Hogan SP
    Pharmacol Ther; 2006 Aug; 111(2):374-83. PubMed ID: 16364445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identifying food proteins with allergenic potential: evolution of approaches to safety assessment and research to provide additional tools.
    Ladics GS; Selgrade MK
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Aug; 54(3 Suppl):S2-6. PubMed ID: 19028539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Current codex guidelines for assessment of potential protein allergenicity.
    Ladics GS
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Oct; 46 Suppl 10():S20-3. PubMed ID: 18708115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of allergenicity of genetically modified soybean protein extract in a murine model of oral allergen-specific sensitization.
    Gizzarelli F; Corinti S; Barletta B; Iacovacci P; Brunetto B; Butteroni C; Afferni C; Onori R; Miraglia M; Panzini G; Di Felice G; Tinghino R
    Clin Exp Allergy; 2006 Feb; 36(2):238-48. PubMed ID: 16433863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of the safety of foods derived from genetically modified (GM) crops.
    König A; Cockburn A; Crevel RW; Debruyne E; Grafstroem R; Hammerling U; Kimber I; Knudsen I; Kuiper HA; Peijnenburg AA; Penninks AH; Poulsen M; Schauzu M; Wal JM
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2004 Jul; 42(7):1047-88. PubMed ID: 15123382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biological and biomedical aspects of genetically modified food.
    Celec P; Kukucková M; Renczésová V; Natarajan S; Pálffy R; Gardlík R; Hodosy J; Behuliak M; Vlková B; Minárik G; Szemes T; Stuchlík S; Turna J
    Biomed Pharmacother; 2005 Dec; 59(10):531-40. PubMed ID: 16298508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Allergenicity assessment of genetically modified crops--what makes sense?
    Goodman RE; Vieths S; Sampson HA; Hill D; Ebisawa M; Taylor SL; van Ree R
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Jan; 26(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 18183024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Will genetically modified foods be allergenic?
    Taylor SL; Hefle SL
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2001 May; 107(5):765-71. PubMed ID: 11344340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing genetically modified crops to minimize the risk of increased food allergy: a review.
    Goodman RE; Hefle SL; Taylor SL; van Ree R
    Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2005 Jun; 137(2):153-66. PubMed ID: 15947471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Animal models for assessment of GMO allergenicity: advantages and limitations].
    Adel-Patient K; Wal JM
    Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol; 2004 Mar; 36(3):88-91. PubMed ID: 15137477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. IgE binding to proteins from sesame and assessment of allergenicity: implications for biotechnology?
    Orruño E; Morgan MR
    Biotechnol Lett; 2006 Dec; 28(23):1877-88. PubMed ID: 17028779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differences in allergenic potential of food extracts following oral exposure in mice reflect differences in digestibility: potential approaches to safety assessment.
    Bowman CC; Selgrade MK
    Toxicol Sci; 2008 Mar; 102(1):100-9. PubMed ID: 18033772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Allergenicity testing of GM crops.
    Aalberse RC
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Oct; 26(10):1070-1; author reply 1071-2. PubMed ID: 18846066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Benefits and concerns associated with biotechnology-derived foods: can additional research reduce children health risks?
    Cantani A
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2006; 10(4):197-206. PubMed ID: 16910351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The allergic risk of transgenic foods strategy for prevention].
    Moneret-Vautrin DA
    Ann Pharm Fr; 2003 Mar; 61(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 12668947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Constantly evolving safety assessment protocols for GM foods.
    Sesikeran B; Vasanthi S
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2008; 17 Suppl 1():241-4. PubMed ID: 18296346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Murine models for evaluating the allergenicity of novel proteins and foods.
    Aldemir H; Bars R; Herouet-Guicheney C
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Aug; 54(3 Suppl):S52-7. PubMed ID: 19100305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Review of animal models designed to predict the potential allergenicity of novel proteins in genetically modified crops.
    Ladics GS; Knippels LM; Penninks AH; Bannon GA; Goodman RE; Herouet-Guicheney C
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Mar; 56(2):212-24. PubMed ID: 19800379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Strategies for safety assessment of genetically modified crops: current and future development].
    Zhuo Q; Yang XG
    Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2005 Mar; 34(2):244-8. PubMed ID: 15952675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.