101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16364800)
1. Surfactant-stabilized contrast agent on the nanoscale for diagnostic ultrasound imaging.
Wheatley MA; Forsberg F; Dube N; Patel M; Oeffinger BE
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 32(1):83-93. PubMed ID: 16364800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and characterization of a nano-scale contrast agent.
Oeffinger BE; Wheatley MA
Ultrasonics; 2004 Apr; 42(1-9):343-7. PubMed ID: 15047309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative acoustic characterization of a new surfactant-based ultrasound contrast agent.
Forsberg F; Wu Y; Makin IR; Wang W; Wheatley MA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 1997; 23(8):1201-8. PubMed ID: 9372569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Novel ultrasound contrast agent based on microbubbles generated from surfactant mixtures of Span 60 and polyoxyethylene 40 stearate.
Xing Z; Ke H; Wang J; Zhao B; Yue X; Dai Z; Liu J
Acta Biomater; 2010 Sep; 6(9):3542-9. PubMed ID: 20226284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The fabrication of novel nanobubble ultrasound contrast agent for potential tumor imaging.
Xing Z; Wang J; Ke H; Zhao B; Yue X; Dai Z; Liu J
Nanotechnology; 2010 Apr; 21(14):145607. PubMed ID: 20220227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of shell type on the in vivo backscatter from polymer-encapsulated microbubbles.
Forsberg F; Lathia JD; Merton DA; Liu JB; Le NT; Goldberg BB; Wheatley MA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Oct; 30(10):1281-7. PubMed ID: 15582227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of filling gases on the backscatter from contrast microbubbles: theory and in vivo measurements.
Forsberg F; Basude R; Liu JB; Alessandro J; Shi WT; Rawool NM; Goldberg BB; Wheatley MA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 1999 Oct; 25(8):1203-11. PubMed ID: 10576263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Generation of ultraharmonics in surfactant based ultrasound contrast agents: use and advantages.
Basude R; Wheatley MA
Ultrasonics; 2001 Oct; 39(6):437-44. PubMed ID: 11775659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On-chip preparation of nanoscale contrast agents towards high-resolution ultrasound imaging.
Peyman SA; McLaughlan JR; Abou-Saleh RH; Marston G; Johnson BR; Freear S; Coletta PL; Markham AF; Evans SD
Lab Chip; 2016 Feb; 16(4):679-87. PubMed ID: 26689151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of in vitro and in vivo acoustic response of a novel 50:50 PLGA contrast agent.
Wheatley MA; Forsberg F; Oum K; Ro R; El-Sherif D
Ultrasonics; 2006 Nov; 44(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 16730047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Theoretical predictions of harmonic generation from submicron ultrasound contrast agents for nonlinear biomedical ultrasound imaging.
Zheng H; Mukdadi O; Shandas R
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 51(3):557-73. PubMed ID: 16424581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prolongation and optimization of Doppler enhancement with a microbubble US contrast agent by using continuous infusion: preliminary experience.
Albrecht T; Urbank A; Mahler M; Bauer A; Doré CJ; Blomley MJ; Cosgrove DO; Schlief R
Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):339-47. PubMed ID: 9577478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of enhancement patterns of focal nodular hyperplasia in contrast-enhanced, wide-band phase-inversion harmonic power Doppler imaging of the liver.
Janica J; Serwatka W; Polaków J; Ustymowicz A; Walecki J; Ladny JR; Dobrzycki S
Med Sci Monit; 2004 Jun; 10 Suppl 3():17-21. PubMed ID: 16538193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of environmental conditions on a new surfactant-based contrast agent: ST68.
Basude R; Duckworth JW; Wheatley MA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2000 May; 26(4):621-8. PubMed ID: 10856625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nanoparticles as image enhancing agents for ultrasonography.
Liu J; Levine AL; Mattoon JS; Yamaguchi M; Lee RJ; Pan X; Rosol TJ
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(9):2179-89. PubMed ID: 16625034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vivo target-specific delivery of macromolecular agents with MR-guided focused ultrasound.
Bednarski MD; Lee JW; Callstrom MR; Li KC
Radiology; 1997 Jul; 204(1):263-8. PubMed ID: 9205257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Investigating perfluorohexane particles with high-frequency ultrasound.
Couture O; Bevan PD; Cherin E; Cheung K; Burns PN; Foster FS
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 32(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 16364799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preclinical acute toxicology study of surfactant-stabilized ultrasound contrast agents in adult rats.
Forsberg F; Liu JB; Patel M; Liu L; Lin L; Solis C; Fox TB; Wheatley MA
Int J Toxicol; 2010; 29(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 20008819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An in vivo rat model simulating imaging of human kidney by diagnostic ultrasound with gas-body contrast agent.
Miller DL; Dou C; Wiggins RC; Wharram BL; Goyal M; Williams AR
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 33(1):129-35. PubMed ID: 17189055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acoustic backscatter properties of the particle/bubble ultrasound contrast agent.
Phillips D; Chen X; Baggs R; Rubens D; Violante M; Parker KJ
Ultrasonics; 1998 Jul; 36(8):883-92. PubMed ID: 9695767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
