These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16364800)

  • 1. Surfactant-stabilized contrast agent on the nanoscale for diagnostic ultrasound imaging.
    Wheatley MA; Forsberg F; Dube N; Patel M; Oeffinger BE
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 32(1):83-93. PubMed ID: 16364800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and characterization of a nano-scale contrast agent.
    Oeffinger BE; Wheatley MA
    Ultrasonics; 2004 Apr; 42(1-9):343-7. PubMed ID: 15047309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative acoustic characterization of a new surfactant-based ultrasound contrast agent.
    Forsberg F; Wu Y; Makin IR; Wang W; Wheatley MA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1997; 23(8):1201-8. PubMed ID: 9372569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Novel ultrasound contrast agent based on microbubbles generated from surfactant mixtures of Span 60 and polyoxyethylene 40 stearate.
    Xing Z; Ke H; Wang J; Zhao B; Yue X; Dai Z; Liu J
    Acta Biomater; 2010 Sep; 6(9):3542-9. PubMed ID: 20226284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The fabrication of novel nanobubble ultrasound contrast agent for potential tumor imaging.
    Xing Z; Wang J; Ke H; Zhao B; Yue X; Dai Z; Liu J
    Nanotechnology; 2010 Apr; 21(14):145607. PubMed ID: 20220227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of shell type on the in vivo backscatter from polymer-encapsulated microbubbles.
    Forsberg F; Lathia JD; Merton DA; Liu JB; Le NT; Goldberg BB; Wheatley MA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Oct; 30(10):1281-7. PubMed ID: 15582227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of filling gases on the backscatter from contrast microbubbles: theory and in vivo measurements.
    Forsberg F; Basude R; Liu JB; Alessandro J; Shi WT; Rawool NM; Goldberg BB; Wheatley MA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1999 Oct; 25(8):1203-11. PubMed ID: 10576263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Generation of ultraharmonics in surfactant based ultrasound contrast agents: use and advantages.
    Basude R; Wheatley MA
    Ultrasonics; 2001 Oct; 39(6):437-44. PubMed ID: 11775659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On-chip preparation of nanoscale contrast agents towards high-resolution ultrasound imaging.
    Peyman SA; McLaughlan JR; Abou-Saleh RH; Marston G; Johnson BR; Freear S; Coletta PL; Markham AF; Evans SD
    Lab Chip; 2016 Feb; 16(4):679-87. PubMed ID: 26689151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of in vitro and in vivo acoustic response of a novel 50:50 PLGA contrast agent.
    Wheatley MA; Forsberg F; Oum K; Ro R; El-Sherif D
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Nov; 44(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 16730047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Theoretical predictions of harmonic generation from submicron ultrasound contrast agents for nonlinear biomedical ultrasound imaging.
    Zheng H; Mukdadi O; Shandas R
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 51(3):557-73. PubMed ID: 16424581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prolongation and optimization of Doppler enhancement with a microbubble US contrast agent by using continuous infusion: preliminary experience.
    Albrecht T; Urbank A; Mahler M; Bauer A; Doré CJ; Blomley MJ; Cosgrove DO; Schlief R
    Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):339-47. PubMed ID: 9577478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of enhancement patterns of focal nodular hyperplasia in contrast-enhanced, wide-band phase-inversion harmonic power Doppler imaging of the liver.
    Janica J; Serwatka W; Polaków J; Ustymowicz A; Walecki J; Ladny JR; Dobrzycki S
    Med Sci Monit; 2004 Jun; 10 Suppl 3():17-21. PubMed ID: 16538193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of environmental conditions on a new surfactant-based contrast agent: ST68.
    Basude R; Duckworth JW; Wheatley MA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2000 May; 26(4):621-8. PubMed ID: 10856625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nanoparticles as image enhancing agents for ultrasonography.
    Liu J; Levine AL; Mattoon JS; Yamaguchi M; Lee RJ; Pan X; Rosol TJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(9):2179-89. PubMed ID: 16625034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vivo target-specific delivery of macromolecular agents with MR-guided focused ultrasound.
    Bednarski MD; Lee JW; Callstrom MR; Li KC
    Radiology; 1997 Jul; 204(1):263-8. PubMed ID: 9205257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigating perfluorohexane particles with high-frequency ultrasound.
    Couture O; Bevan PD; Cherin E; Cheung K; Burns PN; Foster FS
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 32(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 16364799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preclinical acute toxicology study of surfactant-stabilized ultrasound contrast agents in adult rats.
    Forsberg F; Liu JB; Patel M; Liu L; Lin L; Solis C; Fox TB; Wheatley MA
    Int J Toxicol; 2010; 29(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 20008819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An in vivo rat model simulating imaging of human kidney by diagnostic ultrasound with gas-body contrast agent.
    Miller DL; Dou C; Wiggins RC; Wharram BL; Goyal M; Williams AR
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 33(1):129-35. PubMed ID: 17189055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acoustic backscatter properties of the particle/bubble ultrasound contrast agent.
    Phillips D; Chen X; Baggs R; Rubens D; Violante M; Parker KJ
    Ultrasonics; 1998 Jul; 36(8):883-92. PubMed ID: 9695767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.