121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16365590)
1. Overall breast density in MR mammography: diagnostic and therapeutic implications in breast cancer.
Echevarria JJ; Martín M; Saiz A; Imaz I; Férnandez-Ruanova B; Martín D; López-Ruiz JA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2006; 30(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 16365590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
Berg WA; Gutierrez L; NessAiver MS; Carter WB; Bhargavan M; Lewis RS; Ioffe OB
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):830-49. PubMed ID: 15486214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in Fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard.
Sardanelli F; Giuseppetti GM; Panizza P; Bazzocchi M; Fausto A; Simonetti G; Lattanzio V; Del Maschio A;
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Oct; 183(4):1149-57. PubMed ID: 15385322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sensitivity of imaging for multifocal-multicentric breast carcinoma.
Bozzini A; Renne G; Meneghetti L; Bandi G; Santos G; Vento AR; Menna S; Andrighetto S; Viale G; Cassano E; Bellomi M
BMC Cancer; 2008 Sep; 8():275. PubMed ID: 18826585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Preoperative MR mammography in breast carcinoma. Effect on operative treatment from the surgical viewpoint].
Gatzemeier W; Liersch T; Stylianou A; Buttler A; Becker H; Fischer U
Chirurg; 1999 Dec; 70(12):1460-8. PubMed ID: 10637703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of MR-mammography as a solitary imaging technique in women with dense breasts: an economic evaluation of the prospective TK-Study.
Froelich MF; Kaiser CG
Eur Radiol; 2021 Feb; 31(2):967-974. PubMed ID: 32856166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography: does it affect surgical decision-making in patients with breast cancer?
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Padula S; Roselli A; Moriconi E; Dominelli V; Pronio AM; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Nov; 106(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 17203383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tailored breast cancer screening program with microdose mammography, US, and MR Imaging: short-term results of a pilot study in 40-49-year-old women.
Venturini E; Losio C; Panizza P; Rodighiero MG; Fedele I; Tacchini S; Schiani E; Ravelli S; Cristel G; Panzeri MM; De Cobelli F; Del Maschio A
Radiology; 2013 Aug; 268(2):347-55. PubMed ID: 23579052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sensitivity and specificity of MR mammography with histopathological correlation in 250 breasts.
Boné B; Aspelin P; Bronge L; Isberg B; Perbeck L; Veress B
Acta Radiol; 1996 Mar; 37(2):208-13. PubMed ID: 8600964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Role of MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) versus conventional imaging for breast cancer presurgical staging in young women or with dense breast.
Biglia N; Bounous VE; Martincich L; Panuccio E; Liberale V; Ottino L; Ponzone R; Sismondi P
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2011 Mar; 37(3):199-204. PubMed ID: 21237612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Solid Papillary Carcinoma of the Breast: Magnetic Resonance Mammography, Digital Mammography, and Ultrasound Findings.
You C; Peng W; Shen X; Zhi W; Yang W; Gu Y
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2018; 42(5):771-775. PubMed ID: 29613993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Potential of MR mammography to predict tumor grading of invasive breast cancer.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Zoubi R; Gröschel T; Burmeister H; Gajda M; Runnebaum IB; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2011 Sep; 183(9):826-33. PubMed ID: 21442559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pre-operative staging of invasive breast cancer with MR mammography and/or PET: boon or bunk?
Rieber A; Schirrmeister H; Gabelmann A; Nuessle K; Reske S; Kreienberg R; Brambs HJ; Kuehn T
Br J Radiol; 2002 Oct; 75(898):789-98. PubMed ID: 12381687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing tumor extent on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus full-field digital mammography and ultrasound.
Patel BK; Garza SA; Eversman S; Lopez-Alvarez Y; Kosiorek H; Pockaj BA
Clin Imaging; 2017; 46():78-84. PubMed ID: 28750354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is 0.6T magnetic resonance mammography adequate in the detection of breast cancer?
Marklund M; Moller JM; Burchard AJ; Bentzon N; Balslev E; Sletting S; Nolsoe CP
Acta Radiol; 2006 Jun; 47(5):446-53. PubMed ID: 16796304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MR mammography in the pre-operative staging of breast cancer in patients with dense breast tissue: comparison with mammography and ultrasound.
Van Goethem M; Schelfout K; Dijckmans L; Van Der Auwera JC; Weyler J; Verslegers I; Biltjes I; De Schepper A
Eur Radiol; 2004 May; 14(5):809-16. PubMed ID: 14615904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MR Imaging as an Additional Screening Modality for the Detection of Breast Cancer in Women Aged 50-75 Years with Extremely Dense Breasts: The DENSE Trial Study Design.
Emaus MJ; Bakker MF; Peeters PH; Loo CE; Mann RM; de Jong MD; Bisschops RH; Veltman J; Duvivier KM; Lobbes MB; Pijnappel RM; Karssemeijer N; de Koning HJ; van den Bosch MA; Monninkhof EM; Mali WP; Veldhuis WB; van Gils CH
Radiology; 2015 Nov; 277(2):527-37. PubMed ID: 26110667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multicentric Cancer Detected at Breast MR Imaging and Not at Mammography: Important or Not?
Iacconi C; Galman L; Zheng J; Sacchini V; Sutton EJ; Dershaw D; Morris EA
Radiology; 2016 May; 279(2):378-84. PubMed ID: 26605912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography.
Su X; Lin Q; Cui C; Xu W; Wei Z; Fei J; Li L
Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 27837442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
