288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16365948)
41. Modality effects in sentence recall.
Goolkasian P; Foos PW; Eaton M
J Gen Psychol; 2009 Apr; 136(2):205-23. PubMed ID: 19350835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Articulatory and phonological determinants of word length effects in span tasks.
Caplan D; Rochon E; Waters GS
Q J Exp Psychol A; 1992 Aug; 45(2):177-92. PubMed ID: 1410554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Working memory in learning disability subgroups.
Swanson HL
J Exp Child Psychol; 1993 Aug; 56(1):87-114. PubMed ID: 8366327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. From Brown-Peterson to continual distractor via operation span: A SIMPLE account of complex span.
Neath I; VanWormer LA; Bireta TJ; Surprenant AM
Can J Exp Psychol; 2014 Sep; 68(3):204-11. PubMed ID: 25383478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: a test of four hypotheses.
Engle RW; Cantor J; Carullo JJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Sep; 18(5):972-92. PubMed ID: 1402719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Task experience and children's working memory performance: a perspective from recall timing.
Towse JN; Cowan N; Horton NJ; Whytock S
Dev Psychol; 2008 May; 44(3):695-706. PubMed ID: 18473637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Word associations are formed incidentally during sentential semantic integration.
Prior A; Bentin S
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 17367741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Phonological similarity and lexicality effects in children's verbal short-term memory: concerns about the interpretation of probed recall data.
Jarrold C; Cocksey J; Dockerill E
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Feb; 61(2):324-40. PubMed ID: 17853204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Working memory and sequence learning in the Hebb Digits task: awareness is predicted by individual differences in operation span.
Weitz D; O'Shea G; Zook N; Needham W
Am J Psychol; 2011; 124(1):49-62. PubMed ID: 21506450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Antecedent priming at trace positions in children's sentence processing.
Roberts L; Marinis T; Felser C; Clahsen H
J Psycholinguist Res; 2007 Mar; 36(2):175-88. PubMed ID: 17160507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Phonological similarity effects in simple and complex span tasks.
Macnamara BN; Moore AB; Conway AR
Mem Cognit; 2011 Oct; 39(7):1174-86. PubMed ID: 21503805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Phonological information in short-term memory of sentences].
Rummer R; Schrobildgen M
Z Exp Psychol; 2000; 47(2):144-54. PubMed ID: 10829617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Effects of word- and sentence-level contexts upon word recognition.
Colombo L; Williams J
Mem Cognit; 1990 Mar; 18(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 2319957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Word-frequency effects on short-term memory tasks: evidence for a redintegration process in immediate serial recall.
Hulme C; Roodenrys S; Schweickert R; Brown GD; Martin M; Stuart G
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Sep; 23(5):1217-32. PubMed ID: 9293631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Exploring the role of attention during memory retrieval: effects of semantic encoding and divided attention.
Lozito JP; Mulligan NW
Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):986-98. PubMed ID: 17128598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Cued recall from image and sentence memory: a shift from episodic to identical elements representation.
Rickard TC; Bajic D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):734-48. PubMed ID: 16822144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The influence of story context on a working memory span task.
Schroeder PJ; Copeland DE; Bies-Hernandez NJ
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(3):488-500. PubMed ID: 22059732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Recall of short word lists presented visually at fast rates: effects of phonological similarity and word length.
Coltheart V; Langdon R
Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):330-42. PubMed ID: 9584440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Sentence repetition: what does the task measure?
Polišenská K; Chiat S; Roy P
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2015; 50(1):106-18. PubMed ID: 25208477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The revelation that the revelation effect is not due to revelation.
Westerman DL; Greene RL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Mar; 24(2):377-86. PubMed ID: 9530844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
