These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16366047)

  • 21. Marginal leakage of filled dentin adhesives used with wet and dry bonding techniques.
    Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2000 Apr; 13(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 11764834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of layering techniques on the micro-tensile bond strength to dentin in resin composite restorations.
    Niu Y; Ma X; Fan M; Zhu S
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):129-34. PubMed ID: 18614225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The axial bevel technique: a new technique for extensive posterior resin composite restorations.
    Liebenberg WH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Apr; 31(4):231-9. PubMed ID: 11203930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Replacement of resin-based composite: evaluation of cavity design, cavity depth, and shade matching.
    Gordan VV; Mondragon E; Shen C
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Apr; 33(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 11989376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Restoring the interproximal zone using the proximal adaptation technique--Part 2.
    Terry DA
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2005 Jan; 26(1):11-2, 15-6, 18 passim; quiz 30, 53. PubMed ID: 15948507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Resin composite contours.
    Sidelsky H
    Br Dent J; 2010 May; 208(9):395-401. PubMed ID: 20448605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quality assessment of marginal sealing using 7 dentin adhesive systems.
    Zivković S
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Jun; 31(6):423-9. PubMed ID: 11203961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of placement techniques on the marginal adaptation of Class V composite restorations.
    Sensi LG; Marson FC; Baratieri LN; Monteiro Junior S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 Nov; 6(4):17-25. PubMed ID: 16299603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of incorrect application of a water-based adhesive system on the marginal adaptation of Class V restorations.
    Peschke A; Blunck U; Roulet JF
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):239-44. PubMed ID: 11764109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Resin pins: a novel composite resin concept for treatment of posterior teeth--technical presentation.
    de Almeida BC; de Almeida RS
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 20(8):507-11; quiz 512. PubMed ID: 18990903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Nanohybrid composite vs. fine hybrid composite in extended class II cavities: clinical and microscopic results after 2 years.
    Krämer N; Reinelt C; García-Godoy F; Taschner M; Petschelt A; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2009 Aug; 22(4):228-34. PubMed ID: 19824560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. SEM evaluation of marginal sealing on composite restorations using different photoactivation and composite insertion methods.
    Lopes MB; Costa LA; Consani S; Gonini AJ; Sinhoreti MA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 20139558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Class II direct composite resin restorations with beta-quartz glass-ceramic inserts.
    Rada RE
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Nov; 24(11):793-8. PubMed ID: 20830892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of light-curing method and irradiation time on marginal sealing and cavity wall adaptation of resin composite restorations.
    Yoshikawa T; Nakaoki Y; Takada T; Burrow MF; Tagami J
    Am J Dent; 2003 Sep; 16 Spec No():63A-67A. PubMed ID: 14674502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A direct approach to restore anterior teeth.
    Denehy GE
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):55D-59D. PubMed ID: 11763919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of flowable composite lining and operator experience on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations.
    Chuang SF; Liu JK; Chao CC; Liao FP; Chen YH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Feb; 85(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 11208208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Direct dentin bonding technique sensitivity when using air/suction drying steps.
    Magne P; Mahallati R; Bazos P; So WS
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(2):130-8; discussion 139-40. PubMed ID: 18380845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of new light curing units and bonding agents on the microleakage of Class V composite resin restorations.
    Pradelle-Plasse N; Besnault C; Souad N; Colon P
    Am J Dent; 2003 Dec; 16(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 15002957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.