BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16366386)

  • 1. [Comparative results of type II ossiculoplasty: incus transposition versus titanium PORP (Kurz)].
    Ceccato SB; Maunsell R; Morata GC; Portmann D
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2005; 126(3):175-9. PubMed ID: 16366386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Results after rebuilding the ossicular chain using the autogenous incus, ionomer-cement-and titanium implants (tympanoplasty type III)].
    Geyer G; Rocker J
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2002 Mar; 81(3):164-70. PubMed ID: 11967767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Partial ossicular reconstruction: comparison of three different prostheses in clinical and experimental studies.
    Neudert M; Zahnert T; Lasurashvili N; Bornitz M; Lavcheva Z; Offergeld C
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):332-8. PubMed ID: 19174710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Kurz titanium prosthesis ossiculoplasty--follow-up statistical analysis of factors affecting one year hearing results.
    Alaani A; Raut VV
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2010 Apr; 37(2):150-4. PubMed ID: 19553041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tympano-ossiculoplasty utilizing the Spiggle and Theis titanium total ossicular replacement prosthesis.
    Neff BA; Rizer FM; Schuring AG; Lippy WH
    Laryngoscope; 2003 Sep; 113(9):1525-9. PubMed ID: 12972928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Lysis of the incus long process and incudostapedial rebridging ossiculoplasty: comparative study of titanium-gold angle prosthesis Plester-type versus Martin Incudo prosthesis hydroxylapatite].
    Faye MB; Martin C; Schmerber S
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2013; 134(3):125-30. PubMed ID: 24974404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Functional results in the reconstruction of the ossicular chain in partial or total atrophy of the incus. Comparison between reconstruction using a moulded incus and hydroxyapatite PORP].
    Ferrero V; Bussi M; Giordano L; Cavalot AL; Albera R
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2000 Jun; 20(3):159-64. PubMed ID: 11139873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hearing results with a hydroxylapatite/titanium bell partial ossicular replacement prosthesis.
    Smith J; Gardner E; Dornhoffer JL
    Laryngoscope; 2002 Oct; 112(10):1796-9. PubMed ID: 12368618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ossiculoplasty in intact stapes and malleus patients: a comparison of PORPs versus TORPs with malleus relocation and Silastic banding techniques.
    Vincent R; Rovers M; Mistry N; Oates J; Sperling N; Grolman W
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jun; 32(4):616-25. PubMed ID: 21765387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Titanium vs hydroxyapatite ossiculoplasty in canal wall down mastoidectomy.
    Redaelli de Zinis LO
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Dec; 134(12):1283-7. PubMed ID: 19075123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Middle ear reconstruction using the titanium Kurz Variac partial ossicular replacement prosthesis: functional results.
    Meulemans J; Wuyts FL; Forton GE
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Oct; 139(10):1017-25. PubMed ID: 24135742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Titanium middle ear prostheses in staged ossiculoplasty: does mass really matter?
    Hales NW; Shakir FA; Saunders JE
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2007; 28(3):164-7. PubMed ID: 17499131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Effect of ossicular chain reconstruction with titanium ossicular replacement prosthesis in mastoidectomy with synchronous ossiculoplasty].
    Mao M; Zhai J; Chen G; Zhang J; Ma Z; Xue J
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 May; 28(10):708-11. PubMed ID: 25129971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Efficacy of ossicular chain reconstruction using titanium implants in single-stage tympanoplasty].
    CHEN B; TAO DD
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 47(4):270-3. PubMed ID: 22800341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Titanium versus nontitanium prostheses in ossiculoplasty.
    Coffey CS; Lee FS; Lambert PR
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Sep; 118(9):1650-8. PubMed ID: 18607302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Revision ossicular reconstruction with the titanium Kurz prosthesis.
    Downs BW; Pearson JM; Zdanski CJ; Buchman CA; Pillsbury HC
    Laryngoscope; 2002 Aug; 112(8 Pt 1):1335-7. PubMed ID: 12172240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tympanoplasty type II with ionomeric cement and titanium-gold-angle prostheses.
    Maassen MM; Zenner HP
    Am J Otol; 1998 Nov; 19(6):693-9. PubMed ID: 9831138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prognostic factors in ossiculoplasty.
    De Vos C; Gersdorff M; GĂ©rard JM
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 17195748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new prosthesis for reconstructing the incudostapedial joint.
    Nadel DM; Silverstein H; Olds MJ
    Am J Otol; 1997 Sep; 18(5):540-3. PubMed ID: 9303148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. First experience with a new titanium clip stapes prosthesis and a comparison with the earlier model used in stapes surgery.
    Hornung JA; Brase C; Bozzato A; Zenk J; Iro H
    Laryngoscope; 2009 Dec; 119(12):2421-7. PubMed ID: 19718742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.