176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16366665)
1. Comparison of several methods for the extraction of DNA from potatoes and potato-derived products.
Smith DS; Maxwell PW; De Boer SH
J Agric Food Chem; 2005 Dec; 53(26):9848-59. PubMed ID: 16366665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of processing on potato starch: in vitro availability and glycaemic index.
García-Alonso A; Goñi I
Nahrung; 2000 Feb; 44(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 10702994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of screening methods for the identification of genetically modified potatoes in raw materials and finished products.
Jaccaud E; Höhne M; Meyer R
J Agric Food Chem; 2003 Jan; 51(3):550-7. PubMed ID: 12537422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Enhancing sucrose synthase activity in transgenic potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tubers results in increased levels of starch, ADPglucose and UDPglucose and total yield.
Baroja-Fernández E; Muñoz FJ; Montero M; Etxeberria E; Sesma MT; Ovecka M; Bahaji A; Ezquer I; Li J; Prat S; Pozueta-Romero J
Plant Cell Physiol; 2009 Sep; 50(9):1651-62. PubMed ID: 19608713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving potato storage and processing characteristics through all-native DNA transformation.
Rommens CM; Ye J; Richael C; Swords K
J Agric Food Chem; 2006 Dec; 54(26):9882-7. PubMed ID: 17177515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Potato tuber proteomics: comparison of two complementary extraction methods designed for 2-DE of acidic proteins.
Delaplace P; van der Wal F; Dierick JF; Cordewener JH; Fauconnier ML; du Jardin P; America AH
Proteomics; 2006 Dec; 6(24):6494-7. PubMed ID: 17096317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of phenolic compounds by high-performance liquid chromatography and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry in potato plant flowers, leaves, stems, and tubers and in home-processed potatoes.
Im HW; Suh BS; Lee SU; Kozukue N; Ohnisi-Kameyama M; Levin CE; Friedman M
J Agric Food Chem; 2008 May; 56(9):3341-9. PubMed ID: 18386928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Isolation of genomic DNA from Cinnamomum cassia Presl].
Xu H; Zhang J; Zheng M; Yuan W
Zhong Yao Cai; 2004 May; 27(5):326-9. PubMed ID: 15376384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the genomic DNA extracted from GMO and non-GMO foodstuffs with four different extraction methods.
Peano C; Samson MC; Palmieri L; Gulli M; Marmiroli N
J Agric Food Chem; 2004 Nov; 52(23):6962-8. PubMed ID: 15537304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distortion of genetically modified organism quantification in processed foods: influence of particle size compositions and heat-induced DNA degradation.
Moreano F; Busch U; Engel KH
J Agric Food Chem; 2005 Dec; 53(26):9971-9. PubMed ID: 16366682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Method for the detection of synthetic cry3A in transgenic potatoes.
Smith DS; Maxwell PW; De Boer SH
J Agric Food Chem; 2004 Feb; 52(4):809-15. PubMed ID: 14969535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of a certified reference material for genetically modified potato with altered starch composition.
Broothaerts W; Corbisier P; Emons H; Emteborg H; Linsinger TP; Trapmann S
J Agric Food Chem; 2007 Jun; 55(12):4728-34. PubMed ID: 17508757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The amyloplast proteome of potato tuber.
Stensballe A; Hald S; Bauw G; Blennow A; Welinder KG
FEBS J; 2008 Apr; 275(8):1723-41. PubMed ID: 18331355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Distribution of ascorbic acid in potato tubers and in home-processed and commercial potato foods.
Han JS; Kozukue N; Young KS; Lee KR; Friedman M
J Agric Food Chem; 2004 Oct; 52(21):6516-21. PubMed ID: 15479016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An improved method of isolation of high quality total RNA from purple-fleshed sweet potato, Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.
Zhou W; Gong Y; Feng Q; Gao F
Prep Biochem Biotechnol; 2009; 39(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 19291573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Critical points of DNA quantification by real-time PCR--effects of DNA extraction method and sample matrix on quantification of genetically modified organisms.
Cankar K; Stebih D; Dreo T; Zel J; Gruden K
BMC Biotechnol; 2006 Aug; 6():37. PubMed ID: 16907967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Toward metrological traceability for DNA fragment ratios in GM quantification. 1. Effect of DNA extraction methods on the quantitative determination of Bt176 corn by real-time PCR.
Corbisier P; Broothaerts W; Gioria S; Schimmel H; Burns M; Baoutina A; Emslie KR; Furui S; Kurosawa Y; Holden MJ; Kim HH; Lee YM; Kawaharasaki M; Sin D; Wang J
J Agric Food Chem; 2007 May; 55(9):3249-57. PubMed ID: 17407305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using the TxtAB operon to quantify pathogenic Streptomyces in potato tubers and soil.
Qu X; Wanner LA; Christ BJ
Phytopathology; 2008 Apr; 98(4):405-12. PubMed ID: 18944188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Simultaneous detection of potato viruses, PLRV, PVA, PVX and PVY from dormant potato tubers by TaqMan real-time RT-PCR.
Agindotan BO; Shiel PJ; Berger PH
J Virol Methods; 2007 Jun; 142(1-2):1-9. PubMed ID: 17276522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validated method for quantification of genetically modified organisms in samples of maize flour.
Kunert R; Gach JS; Vorauer-Uhl K; Engel E; Katinger H
J Agric Food Chem; 2006 Feb; 54(3):678-81. PubMed ID: 16448167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
