These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16367072)
1. Further evidence on 16 PF distortion scales. Krug SE J Pers Assess; 1978 Oct; 42(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 16367072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Personality profile of patients with anxiety disorder, as studied with the 16PF Cattell's questionnaire and Cloninger's TCI]. Samochowiec J; Kucharska-Mazur J; Hajduk A; Wojciechowski B; Samochowiec A Psychiatr Pol; 2005; 39(3):527-36. PubMed ID: 16149762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Meta-interpretive reliability of computer-based test interpretations: the Karson Clinical Report. Endres LS; Guastello SJ; Rieke ML J Pers Assess; 1992 Dec; 59(3):448-67. PubMed ID: 1487802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detecting fake-good and fake-bad MMPI-2 profiles. Graham JR; Watts D; Timbrook RE J Pers Assess; 1991 Oct; 57(2):264-77. PubMed ID: 1955975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Faking bad and faking good by college students on the Korean MMPI-2. Hahn J J Pers Assess; 2005 Aug; 85(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 16083385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Motivational distortion of the 16PF by welfare recipients. Merydith SP; Humphreys JK; Ebener DJ J Pers Assess; 1997 Oct; 69(2):376-91. PubMed ID: 9392896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cross-validation study of the personality aspects of involvement in pilot-error accidents. Sanders MG; Hofmann MA; Neese TA Aviat Space Environ Med; 1976 Feb; 47(2):177-9. PubMed ID: 1252212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Form E of the 16PF and adults with mental retardation: internal consistency and validity. Spirrison CL J Pers Assess; 1992 Jun; 58(3):525-36. PubMed ID: 1613655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Further evidence concerning motivational distortion on the Sixteen Personality Factor primaries by male felons. Seibel HP; Wallbrown FH; Reuter EK; Barnett RW J Pers Assess; 1990; 55(1-2):367-75. PubMed ID: 2231256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Research Validity Scales for the NEO-PI-R: additional evidence for reliability and validity. Young MS; Schinka JA J Pers Assess; 2001 Jun; 76(3):412-20. PubMed ID: 11499455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detecting malingered and defensive responding on the MMPI-2 in a forensic inpatient sample. Bagby RM; Rogers R; Buis T J Pers Assess; 1994 Apr; 62(2):191-203. PubMed ID: 8189330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]