These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16367732)

  • 1. Domains and facets: hierarchical personality assessment using the revised NEO personality inventory.
    Costa PT; McCrae RR
    J Pers Assess; 1995 Feb; 64(1):21-50. PubMed ID: 16367732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing two alternative measures of general personality in the assessment of psychopathy: a test of the NEO PI-R and the MPQ.
    Gaughan ET; Miller JD; Pryor LR; Lynam DR
    J Pers; 2009 Aug; 77(4):965-96. PubMed ID: 19558446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Domain and facet personality predictors of all-cause mortality among Medicare patients aged 65 to 100.
    Weiss A; Costa PT
    Psychosom Med; 2005; 67(5):724-33. PubMed ID: 16204430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A psychometric evaluation of the new NEO-PIR facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness.
    Piedmont RL; Weinstein HP
    J Pers Assess; 1993 Apr; 60(2):302-18. PubMed ID: 16370832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Validation of the French version of the 10-item Big Five Inventory].
    Courtois R; Petot JM; Plaisant O; Allibe B; Lignier B; Réveillère C; Lecocq G; John O
    Encephale; 2020 Dec; 46(6):455-462. PubMed ID: 32331765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Positive and negative symptoms of schizotypy and the Five-factor model: a domain and facet level analysis.
    Ross SR; Lutz CJ; Bailley SE
    J Pers Assess; 2002 Aug; 79(1):53-72. PubMed ID: 12227668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Research validity scales for the NEO-PI-R: development and initial validation.
    Schinka JA; Kinder BN; Kremer T
    J Pers Assess; 1997 Feb; 68(1):127-38. PubMed ID: 16370773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relation between alexithymia and the five-factor model of personality: a facet-level analysis.
    Luminet O; Bagby RM; Wagner H; Taylor GJ; Parker JD
    J Pers Assess; 1999 Dec; 73(3):345-58. PubMed ID: 10689648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stability and change in personality assessment: the revised NEO Personality Inventory in the year 2000.
    Costa PT; McCrae RR
    J Pers Assess; 1997 Feb; 68(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 9018844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Describing depressive personality analogues and dysthymics on the NEO-Personality Inventory-Revised.
    Huprich SK
    J Clin Psychol; 2000 Dec; 56(12):1521-34. PubMed ID: 11132568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of response sets on NEO-PI-R scores and their relations to external criteria.
    Caldwell-Andrews A; Baer RA; Berry DT
    J Pers Assess; 2000 Jun; 74(3):472-88. PubMed ID: 10900573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Replicable item-cluster subcomponents in the NEO Five-Factor Inventory.
    Saucier G
    J Pers Assess; 1998 Apr; 70(2):263-76. PubMed ID: 9697330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of positive impression management on the NEO Personality Inventory--Revised in a clinical population.
    Ballenger JF; Caldwell-Andrews A; Baer RA
    Psychol Assess; 2001 Jun; 13(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 11433800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Five-factor Personality Inventory as a measure of the Five-factor Model: Belgian, American, and Hungarian comparisons with the NEO-PI-R.
    De Fruyt F; McCrae RR; Szirmák Z; Nagy J
    Assessment; 2004 Sep; 11(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 15358876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The utility of the NEO-PI-R validity scales to detect response distortion: a comparison with the MMPI-2.
    Morasco BJ; Gfeller JD; Elder KA
    J Pers Assess; 2007 Jun; 88(3):276-83. PubMed ID: 17518549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The validity and utility of the positive presentation management and negative presentation management scales for the Revised NEO Personality Inventory.
    Sellbom M; Bagby RM
    Assessment; 2008 Jun; 15(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 18463407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are cross-cultural comparisons of personality profiles meaningful? Differential item and facet functioning in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory.
    Church AT; Alvarez JM; Mai NT; French BF; Katigbak MS; Ortiz FA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Nov; 101(5):1068-89. PubMed ID: 21910552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A five-factor model perspective on psychopathy and comorbid Axis-II disorders in a forensic-psychiatric sample.
    Decuyper M; De Fruyt F; Buschman J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):394-406. PubMed ID: 18790537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Personality traits measured by the Swedish universities Scales of Personality: factor structure and position within the five-factor model in an Estonian sample.
    Aluoja A; Voogne H; Maron E; Gustavsson JP; Võhma U; Shlik J
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2009; 63(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 19034803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the usefulness of measures of normal personality for clinical assessment: evidence of the incremental validity of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory.
    Quirk SW; Christiansen ND; Wagner SH; McNulty JL
    Psychol Assess; 2003 Sep; 15(3):311-25. PubMed ID: 14593831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.