216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16371413)
1. Metamodels of bias in Cox proportional-hazards and logistic regressions with heteroscedastic measurement error under group-level exposure assessment.
Burstyn I; Kim HM; Cherry N; Yasui Y
Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Apr; 50(3):271-9. PubMed ID: 16371413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Attenuation in risk estimates in logistic and Cox proportional-hazards models due to group-based exposure assessment strategy.
Kim HM; Yasui Y; Burstyn I
Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Aug; 50(6):623-35. PubMed ID: 16670097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Poisson regression analysis of ungrouped data.
Loomis D; Richardson DB; Elliott L
Occup Environ Med; 2005 May; 62(5):325-9. PubMed ID: 15837854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimation of health risks associated with occupational radiation exposure: addressing measurement error and minimum detectable exposure level.
Xue X; Kim MY; Shore RE
Health Phys; 2006 Dec; 91(6):582-91. PubMed ID: 17099402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A weighted Cox model for modelling time-dependent exposures in the analysis of case-control studies.
Leffondre K; Wynant W; Cao Z; Abrahamowicz M; Heinze G; Siemiatycki J
Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):839-50. PubMed ID: 20213717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radon exposure assessment and dosimetry applied to epidemiology and risk estimation.
Puskin JS; James AC
Radiat Res; 2006 Jul; 166(1 Pt 2):193-208. PubMed ID: 16808608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the potential of measurement error to induce differential bias on odds ratio estimates: an example from radon epidemiology.
Heid IM; Küchenhoff H; Wellmann J; Gerken M; Kreienbrock L; Wichmann HE
Stat Med; 2002 Nov; 21(21):3261-78. PubMed ID: 12375303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Occupational exposures and risks of liver cancer among Shanghai female textile workers--a case-cohort study.
Chang CK; Astrakianakis G; Thomas DB; Seixas NS; Ray RM; Gao DL; Wernli KJ; Fitzgibbons ED; Vaughan TL; Checkoway H
Int J Epidemiol; 2006 Apr; 35(2):361-9. PubMed ID: 16373377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurement error and model specification in determining how duration of tasks affects level of occupational exposure.
Burstyn I
Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Apr; 53(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 19188265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of exposure in epidemiological studies: the example of silica dust.
Dahmann D; Taeger D; Kappler M; Büchte S; Morfeld P; Brüning T; Pesch B
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 18(5):452-61. PubMed ID: 18059424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Future needs of occupational epidemiology of extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields: review and recommendations.
Kheifets L; Bowman JD; Checkoway H; Feychting M; Harrington JM; Kavet R; Marsh G; Mezei G; Renew DC; van Wijngaarden E
Occup Environ Med; 2009 Feb; 66(2):72-80. PubMed ID: 18805878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cox proportional hazards models have more statistical power than logistic regression models in cross-sectional genetic association studies.
van der Net JB; Janssens AC; Eijkemans MJ; Kastelein JJ; Sijbrands EJ; Steyerberg EW
Eur J Hum Genet; 2008 Sep; 16(9):1111-6. PubMed ID: 18382476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bayesian method for improving logistic regression estimates under group-based exposure assessment with additive measurement errors.
Kim HM; Burstyn I
Arch Environ Occup Health; 2009; 64(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 20007122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comprehensive dose reconstruction methodology for former rocketdyne/atomics international radiation workers.
Boice JD; Leggett RW; Ellis ED; Wallace PW; Mumma M; Cohen SS; Brill AB; Chadda B; Boecker BB; Yoder RC; Eckerman KF
Health Phys; 2006 May; 90(5):409-30. PubMed ID: 16607174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exposure assessment in epidemiology: does gender matter?
Kennedy SM; Koehoorn M
Am J Ind Med; 2003 Dec; 44(6):576-83. PubMed ID: 14635234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved non-negative estimation of variance components for exposure assessment.
Peretz C; Steinberg DM
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2001; 11(5):414-21. PubMed ID: 11687915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An investigation of systematic changes in occupational exposure.
Symanski E; Kupper LL; Kromhout H; Rappaport SM
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1996 Aug; 57(8):724-35. PubMed ID: 8765201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A risk assessment for occupational acrylonitrile exposure using epidemiology data.
Starr TB; Gause C; Youk AO; Stone R; Marsh GM; Collins JJ
Risk Anal; 2004 Jun; 24(3):587-601. PubMed ID: 15209932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating measurement error in estimates of worker exposure assessed in parallel by personal and biological monitoring.
Symanski E; Greeson NM; Chan W
Am J Ind Med; 2007 Feb; 50(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 17238141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bayesian modelling of lung cancer risk and bitumen fume exposure adjusted for unmeasured confounding by smoking.
de Vocht F; Kromhout H; Ferro G; Boffetta P; Burstyn I
Occup Environ Med; 2009 Aug; 66(8):502-8. PubMed ID: 19060029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
