188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16371551)
1. In vivo perfusion estimation using subharmonic contrast microbubble signals.
Forsberg F; Liu JB; Shi WT; Ro R; Lipcan KJ; Deng X; Hall AL
J Ultrasound Med; 2006 Jan; 25(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 16371551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perfusion estimation using contrast-enhanced 3-dimensional subharmonic ultrasound imaging: an in vivo study.
Sridharan A; Eisenbrey JR; Liu JB; Machado P; Halldorsdottir VG; Dave JK; Zhao H; He Y; Park S; Dianis S; Wallace K; Thomenius KE; Forsberg F
Invest Radiol; 2013 Sep; 48(9):654-60. PubMed ID: 23695085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Simultaneous grayscale and subharmonic ultrasound imaging on a modified commercial scanner.
Eisenbrey JR; Dave JK; Halldorsdottir VG; Merton DA; Machado P; Liu JB; Miller C; Gonzalez JM; Park S; Dianis S; Chalek CL; Thomenius KE; Brown DB; Navarro V; Forsberg F
Ultrasonics; 2011 Dec; 51(8):890-7. PubMed ID: 21621239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Subharmonic imaging with microbubble contrast agents: initial results.
Shi WT; Forsberg F; Hall AL; Chiao RY; Liu JB; Miller S; Thomenius KE; Wheatley MA; Goldberg BB
Ultrason Imaging; 1999 Apr; 21(2):79-94. PubMed ID: 10485563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Static and dynamic cumulative maximum intensity display mode for subharmonic breast imaging: a comparative study with mammographic and conventional ultrasound techniques.
Dave JK; Forsberg F; Fernandes S; Piccoli CW; Fox TB; Merton DA; Leodore LM; Hall AL
J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Aug; 29(8):1177-85. PubMed ID: 20660451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast lesions: imaging with contrast-enhanced subharmonic US--initial experience.
Forsberg F; Piccoli CW; Merton DA; Palazzo JJ; Hall AL
Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):718-26. PubMed ID: 17690324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Parametric imaging using subharmonic signals from ultrasound contrast agents in patients with breast lesions.
Eisenbrey JR; Dave JK; Merton DA; Palazzo JP; Hall AL; Forsberg F
J Ultrasound Med; 2011 Jan; 30(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 21193708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterization of Adnexal Masses Using Contrast-Enhanced Subharmonic Imaging: A Pilot Study.
Delaney LJ; Machado P; Torkzaban M; Lyshchik A; Wessner CE; Kim C; Rosenblum N; Richard S; Wallace K; Forsberg F
J Ultrasound Med; 2020 May; 39(5):977-985. PubMed ID: 31769529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High and low frequency subharmonic imaging of angiogenesis in a murine breast cancer model.
Dahibawkar M; Forsberg MA; Gupta A; Jaffe S; Dulin K; Eisenbrey JR; Halldorsdottir VG; Forsberg AI; Dave JK; Marshall A; Machado P; Fox TB; Liu JB; Forsberg F
Ultrasonics; 2015 Sep; 62():50-5. PubMed ID: 25979676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Subharmonic contrast microbubble signals for noninvasive pressure estimation under static and dynamic flow conditions.
Halldorsdottir VG; Dave JK; Leodore LM; Eisenbrey JR; Park S; Hall AL; Thomenius K; Forsberg F
Ultrason Imaging; 2011 Jul; 33(3):153-64. PubMed ID: 21842580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Parametric subharmonic imaging using a commercial intravascular ultrasound scanner: an in vivo feasibility study.
Eisenbrey JR; Sridharan A; deMuinck ED; Doyley MM; Forsberg F
J Ultrasound Med; 2012 Mar; 31(3):361-71. PubMed ID: 22368126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of Pulse Shaping on Subharmonic Aided Pressure Estimation In Vitro and In Vivo.
Gupta I; Eisenbrey J; Stanczak M; Sridharan A; Dave JK; Liu JB; Hazard C; Wang X; Wang P; Li H; Wallace K; Forsberg F
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Jan; 36(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 27943411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Subharmonic and Endoscopic Contrast Imaging of Pancreatic Masses: A Pilot Study.
Forsberg F; Stanczak M; Lyshchik A; Loren D; O'Kane P; Siddiqui A; Kowalski TE; Miller C; Fox T; Liu JB; Eisenbrey JR
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):123-129. PubMed ID: 28681437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Renal perfusion parameters measured by contrast-enhanced ultrasound in healthy dogs demonstrate a wide range of variability in the long-term.
Liu DJX; Hesta M; Stock E; Bogaerts E; Broeckx BJG; Saunders JH; Vanderperren K
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2019 Mar; 60(2):201-209. PubMed ID: 30276919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Blood flow quantification with contrast-enhanced US: "entrance in the section" phenomenon--phantom and rabbit study.
Lucidarme O; Franchi-Abella S; Correas JM; Bridal SL; Kurtisovski E; Berger G
Radiology; 2003 Aug; 228(2):473-9. PubMed ID: 12802003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hemodynamic characteristics, myocardial kinetics and microvascular rheology of FS-069, a second-generation echocardiographic contrast agent capable of producing myocardial opacification from a venous injection.
Skyba DM; Camarano G; Goodman NC; Price RJ; Skalak TC; Kaul S
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Nov; 28(5):1292-300. PubMed ID: 8890829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contrast enhanced sonography of visceral perfusion defects in dogs.
Brown JM; Quedens-Case C; Alderman JL; Greener Y; Taylor KJ
J Ultrasound Med; 1997 Jul; 16(7):493-9. PubMed ID: 9315201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. On the usefulness of the mechanical index displayed on clinical ultrasound scanners for predicting contrast microbubble destruction.
Forsberg F; Shi WT; Merritt CR; Dai Q; Solcova M; Goldberg BB
J Ultrasound Med; 2005 Apr; 24(4):443-50. PubMed ID: 15784762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On the implementation of an automated acoustic output optimization algorithm for subharmonic aided pressure estimation.
Dave JK; Halldorsdottir VG; Eisenbrey JR; Merton DA; Liu JB; Machado P; Zhao H; Park S; Dianis S; Chalek CL; Thomenius KE; Brown DB; Forsberg F
Ultrasonics; 2013 Apr; 53(4):880-8. PubMed ID: 23347593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative contrast ultrasound analysis of renal perfusion in normal dogs.
Waller KR; O'Brien RT; Zagzebski JA
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2007; 48(4):373-7. PubMed ID: 17691639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]