These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16372436)

  • 1. United States v. Jacobson.
    United States. District Court. Eastern District of Virginia
    Wests Fed Suppl; 1992; 785():563-9. PubMed ID: 16372436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. United States v. Jacobson.
    United States. District Court. Eastern District of Virginia
    Fed Suppl; 1992; 785():563-9. PubMed ID: 16285101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Johnson v. Superior Court.
    California. Court of Appeal, Second District
    Wests Calif Report; 2000; 95():864-79. PubMed ID: 17225339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fertility doctor accused of fraud.
    Ayres BD
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Nov; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11646885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Privacy on thin ice? Considering the California Court of Appeal decision in Johnson v. Superior Court.
    Plosker JA
    Jurimetrics; 2001; 42(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 12769113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Doctor is found guilty in fertility case.
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Mar; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tucson Woman's Clinic v. Eden.
    United States. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    Wests Fed Rep; 2004; 379():531-57. PubMed ID: 16477726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rose v Secretary of State for Health and Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority.
    Great Britain. England and Wales. Supreme Court of Judicature, High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division
    Fam Law Rep; 2002; 2():962-80. PubMed ID: 16998998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Woodward v. Commissioner of Social Security.
    Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Suffolk
    Wests North East Rep; 2002; 760():257-72. PubMed ID: 16444837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. U v W (Attorney General intervening).
    Great Britain. England and Wales. Supreme Court of Judicature, High Court of Justice, Family Division
    Fam Law Rep; 1997; 2():282-303. PubMed ID: 16998997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Donor, father or parent? Conceiving paternity in the Australian Family Court.
    Dempsey D
    Int J Law Policy Family; 2004 Apr; 18(1):76-102. PubMed ID: 16848077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Discovering donors: legal rights to access information about anonymous sperm donors given to children of artificial insemination in Johnson v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County.
    Bauman JH
    Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 2001; 31(2):193-218. PubMed ID: 12666687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. WomanCare of Southfield, P.C. v. Granholm.
    United States. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division
    Wests Fed Suppl; 2001; 143():827-48. PubMed ID: 16479703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Kevorkian v. Arnett.
    United States. District Court. Central District Court of California
    Wests Fed Suppl; 1996; 939():725-32. PubMed ID: 16320472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hecht v. Superior Court (Kane).
    California. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 7
    Wests Calif Report; 1993 Jun; 20():275-91. PubMed ID: 11648608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Regarding the child's right to information about his/her natural parents and regarding the parents' right to information about the actual maternity or paternity].
    Rotax HH
    Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr; 2007; 56(2):148-71. PubMed ID: 17410931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    Sharak S
    Am J Law Med; 2020 Nov; 46(4):528-535. PubMed ID: 33413013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Artificial insemination: its effect on paternity and inheritance rights.
    Gordon-Ceresky DL
    Conn Probate Law J; 1995; 9(2):245-71. PubMed ID: 16296567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of rights and utility in instituting a child's right to know her genetic history.
    Wallbank J
    Soc Leg Stud; 2004 Jun; 13(2):245-64. PubMed ID: 16270466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. It takes two to tango: information-sharing with offspring among heterosexual parents following identity-release sperm donation.
    Isaksson S; Skoog-Svanberg A; Sydsjö G; Linell L; Lampic C
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Jan; 31(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 26637490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.