These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1637453)

  • 21. Temporal resolution in regions of normal hearing and speech perception in noise for adults with sloping high-frequency hearing loss.
    Feng Y; Yin S; Kiefte M; Wang J
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 19816181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Speech perception of noise with binary gains.
    Wang D; Kjems U; Pedersen MS; Boldt JB; Lunner T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2303-7. PubMed ID: 19062868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Speech discrimination in environment-specific noise].
    von Wedel H
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1985 Aug; 64(8):430-5. PubMed ID: 4046694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Speech perception in noise for children with auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony type hearing loss.
    Rance G; Barker E; Mok M; Dowell R; Rincon A; Garratt R
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):351-60. PubMed ID: 17485984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prediction of speech intelligibility for normal-hearing and cochlearly hearing-impaired listeners.
    Ludvigsen C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Oct; 82(4):1162-71. PubMed ID: 3680775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An Evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN Materials on Listeners With Normal Hearing and Listeners With Hearing Loss.
    Wilson RH; McArdle RA; Smith SL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):844-56. PubMed ID: 17675590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow.
    Gray L; Kesser B; Cole E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Recognition of digits in different types of noise by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Smits C; Houtgast T
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Mar; 46(3):134-44. PubMed ID: 17365067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The efficacy of a multichannel hearing aid in which the gain is controlled by the minima in the temporal signal envelope.
    Festen JM; van Dijkhuizen JN; Plomp R
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():101-10. PubMed ID: 8153556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of noise-induced hearing loss on the intelligibility of speech in noise.
    Smoorenburg GF; de Laat JA; Plomp R
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 16():123-33. PubMed ID: 6962506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of periodic masker interruption on the intelligibility of interrupted speech.
    Iyer N; Brungart DS; Simpson BD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1693. PubMed ID: 17927429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [The noise-suppression capacity of the auditory analyzer for interfering speech in one's native and in an unknown language].
    Tatevosian GI
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1994; (2):14-7. PubMed ID: 7855991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A proposal for the measurement of the level of fluctuating background noise used in audiology.
    Tschopp K; Beckenbauer T; Harris F
    Scand Audiol; 1991; 20(3):197-202. PubMed ID: 1842289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of different noises on speech discrimination by the elderly.
    Prosser S; Turrini M; Arslan E
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 476():136-42. PubMed ID: 2087954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Efficient adaptive procedures for threshold and concurrent slope estimates for psychophysics and speech intelligibility tests.
    Brand T; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jun; 111(6):2801-10. PubMed ID: 12083215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Computerized measurement of speech intelligibility. II. Normative data from a 'closed response' test.
    Keidser G
    Scand Audiol; 1991; 20(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 1842283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of selected masking noises on Lombard and sidetone amplification effects.
    Garber SF; Siegel GM; Pick HL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1976 Sep; 19(3):523-35. PubMed ID: 979214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.