These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16374749)

  • 21. Standardization of fetal ultrasound biometry measurements: improving the quality and consistency of measurements.
    Sarris I; Ioannou C; Dighe M; Mitidieri A; Oberto M; Qingqing W; Shah J; Sohoni S; Al Zidjali W; Hoch L; Altman DG; Papageorghiou AT;
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Dec; 38(6):681-7. PubMed ID: 22411446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility study of early fetal growth parameters.
    Verburg BO; Mulder PG; Hofman A; Jaddoe VW; Witteman JC; Steegers EA
    Prenat Diagn; 2008 Apr; 28(4):323-31. PubMed ID: 18324617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis in the assessment of trainee competence in fetal biometry measurement.
    Weerasinghe S; Mirghani H; Revel A; Abu-Zidan FM
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 28(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 16858722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Ultrasonically measured biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference: intra- and interobserver variation in the third trimester.
    Vine DG; Cooperberg PL; Dansereau J
    Am J Perinatol; 1992; 9(5-6):385-7. PubMed ID: 1418140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fetal size in the second trimester is associated with the duration of pregnancy, small fetuses having longer pregnancies.
    Johnsen SL; Wilsgaard T; Rasmussen S; Hanson MA; Godfrey KM; Kiserud T
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2008 Jul; 8():25. PubMed ID: 18627638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Biometry 2000. Fetal growth charts by the French College of fetal ultrasonography and the Inserm U 155].
    Créquat J; Duyme M; Brodaty G
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2000 Jun; 28(6):435-45. PubMed ID: 10935308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Normal range for fetal urine production rate customized by biometry.
    Peixoto-Filho FM; de Sá RA; Velarde LG; de Castro Mocarzel C; Lopes LM; Ville Y
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jan; 287(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 22899306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of human embryonic morphological development on fetal growth parameters: the Rotterdam Periconceptional Cohort (Predict Study).
    Parisi F; Rousian M; Koning AHJ; Willemsen SP; Steegers EAP; Steegers-Theunissen RPM
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2019 Apr; 38(4):613-620. PubMed ID: 30765260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Use of focus point for plane acquisition to improve reproducibility in fetal biometry.
    Vignola S; Donadono V; Cavalli C; Azzaretto V; Casagrandi D; Pandya P; Napolitano R
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Feb; 63(2):237-242. PubMed ID: 37519218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Ultrasonic measurement of biparietal diameter and femur in foetal age determination.
    Dare FO; Smith NC; Smith P
    West Afr J Med; 2004; 23(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 15171520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of fetal biometry and weight in the second trimester of pregnancy: An observer agreement and variability study.
    Matthew J; Malamateniou C; Knight CL; Baruteau KP; Fletcher T; Davidson A; McCabe L; Pasupathy D; Rutherford M
    Ultrasound; 2018 Nov; 26(4):229-244. PubMed ID: 30479638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Interobserver reliability of sonographic fetal biometry in second trimester maternal serum screening.
    Aksoy H; Ozyurt S; Aksoy U; Ozdamar O; Mutlu E; Tutus S; Babayigit MA; Acmaz G
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2017; 44(3):379-383. PubMed ID: 29949277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Training the trainees: a pilot study of inter-observer discrepancy and learning curve in the maternal foetal unit of a tertiary centre.
    Gkamprana AM; Despotidi A; Maroudias G; Michalitsi V; Papantoniou N; Pergialiotis V
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Jul; 41(5):746-749. PubMed ID: 33054457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Obstetric ultrasound scanning by local health workers in a refugee camp on the Thai-Burmese border.
    Rijken MJ; Lee SJ; Boel ME; Papageorghiou AT; Visser GH; Dwell SL; Kennedy SH; Singhasivanon P; White NJ; Nosten F; McGready R
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 34(4):395-403. PubMed ID: 19790099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Estimating Gestational Age With Sonography: Regression-Derived Formula Versus the Fetal Biometric Average.
    Cawyer CR; Anderson SB; Szychowski JM; Neely C; Owen J
    J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Mar; 37(3):677-681. PubMed ID: 28967674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of maternal body mass index on interobserver variability of fetal ultrasound biometry and amniotic-fluid assessment in late pregnancy.
    Martins JG; Kawakita T; Gurganus M; Baraki D; Jain P; Papageorghiou AT; Abuhamad AZ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Dec; 58(6):892-899. PubMed ID: 33836119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of fetal and parental factors on intrauterine growth measurements: results of the EDEN mother-child cohort.
    Albouy-Llaty M; Thiebaugeorges O; Goua V; Magnin G; Schweitzer M; Forhan A; Lelong N; Slama R; Charles MA; Kaminski M;
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Dec; 38(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 21438052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Standardization and quality control of Doppler and fetal biometric ultrasound measurements in low-income setting.
    Ali S; Byamugisha J; Kawooya MG; Kakibogo IM; Ainembabazi I; Biira EA; Kagimu AN; Migisa A; Munyakazi M; Kuniha S; Scheele C; Papageorghiou AT; Klipstein-Grobusch K; Rijken MJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Apr; 61(4):481-487. PubMed ID: 37011080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fetal ultrasound biometry: 2. Abdomen and femur length reference values.
    Kurmanavicius J; Wright EM; Royston P; Zimmermann R; Huch R; Huch A; Wisser J
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Feb; 106(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 10426679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The impact of choice of reference charts and equations on the assessment of fetal biometry.
    Salomon LJ; Bernard JP; Duyme M; Buvat I; Ville Y
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jun; 25(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 15909324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.