193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16374879)
1. Line scan diffusion tensor MRI at low magnetic field strength: feasibility study of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in an early clinical stage.
Hori M; Okubo T; Aoki S; Kumagai H; Araki T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Feb; 23(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 16374879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy in spinal cord: age and cervical spondylosis-related changes.
Mamata H; Jolesz FA; Maier SE
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Jul; 22(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 15971186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The correlation of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in cervical compression myelopathy with neurologic and radiologic severity.
Aota Y; Niwa T; Uesugi M; Yamashita T; Inoue T; Saito T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Apr; 33(7):814-20. PubMed ID: 18379411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient and apparent diffusion tensor maps in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Demir A; Ries M; Moonen CT; Vital JM; Dehais J; Arne P; Caillé JM; Dousset V
Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 14519868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diffusion tensor imaging of the spinal cord at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla.
Rossi C; Boss A; Lindig TM; Martirosian P; Steidle G; Maetzler W; Claussen CD; Klose U; Schick F
Rofo; 2007 Mar; 179(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 17325991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Line-scan diffusion tensor MR imaging at 0.2 T: feasibility study.
Hori M; Aoki S; Okubo T; Ishigame K; Kumagai H; Araki T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Dec; 22(6):794-8. PubMed ID: 16270295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical and MRI predictors of outcome after surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Alafifi T; Kern R; Fehlings M
J Neuroimaging; 2007 Oct; 17(4):315-22. PubMed ID: 17894620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer.
Manenti G; Carlani M; Mancino S; Colangelo V; Di Roma M; Squillaci E; Simonetti G
Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):412-9. PubMed ID: 17507813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation of magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging and clinical findings of cervical myelopathy.
Yoo WK; Kim TH; Hai DM; Sundaram S; Yang YM; Park MS; Kim YC; Kwak YH; Ohn SH; Kim SW
Spine J; 2013 Aug; 13(8):867-76. PubMed ID: 23523441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vivo assessment of cervical cord damage in MS patients: a longitudinal diffusion tensor MRI study.
Agosta F; Absinta M; Sormani MP; Ghezzi A; Bertolotto A; Montanari E; Comi G; Filippi M
Brain; 2007 Aug; 130(Pt 8):2211-9. PubMed ID: 17535835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Approaches to spondylotic cervical myelopathy: conservative versus surgical results in a 3-year follow-up study.
Kadanka Z; Mares M; Bednaník J; Smrcka V; Krbec M; Stejskal L; Chaloupka R; Surelová D; Novotný O; Urbánek I; Dusek L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Oct; 27(20):2205-10; discussion 2210-1. PubMed ID: 12394893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging in patients with cervical spondylotic spinal cord compression: correlations between clinical and electrophysiological findings.
Kerkovský M; Bednarík J; Dušek L; Sprláková-Puková A; Urbánek I; Mechl M; Válek V; Kadanka Z
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jan; 37(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 21228747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Relation of MR T2 image signal intensity ratio of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with clinical manifestations and prognosis].
Shen Y; Zhang YZ; Wang LF
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Nov; 88(43):3072-6. PubMed ID: 19192409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cross-sectional transverse area and hyperintensities on magnetic resonance imaging in relation to the clinical picture in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Kadanka Z; Kerkovsky M; Bednarik J; Jarkovsky J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(23):2573-7. PubMed ID: 17978656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Entropy-based analysis for diffusion anisotropy mapping of healthy and myelopathic spinal cord.
Cui JL; Wen CY; Hu Y; Li TH; Luk KD
Neuroimage; 2011 Feb; 54(3):2125-31. PubMed ID: 20951216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A diffusion tensor imaging group study of the spinal cord in multiple sclerosis patients with and without T2 spinal cord lesions.
van Hecke W; Nagels G; Emonds G; Leemans A; Sijbers J; van Goethem J; Parizel PM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jul; 30(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 19557843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic value of somatosensory-evoked potentials in the surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Hu Y; Ding Y; Ruan D; Wong YW; Cheung KM; Luk KD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May; 33(10):E305-10. PubMed ID: 18449030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Relationship of dynamic cord impingement with disease severity and prognosis in cervical spondylotic myelopathy].
Wang LF; Shen Y; Zhang YZ; Xu JX; Ding WY; Cao JM
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Nov; 89(41):2883-7. PubMed ID: 20137642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dynamic evaluation of the spinal cord in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy using a kinematic magnetic resonance imaging technique.
Miura J; Doita M; Miyata K; Marui T; Nishida K; Fujii M; Kurosaka M
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Feb; 22(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 19190428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diffusion changes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.
Zhang L; Harrison M; Heier LA; Zimmerman RD; Ravdin L; Lockshin M; Uluğ AM
Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Apr; 25(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 17371731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
