These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16375790)

  • 41. The concept of sustainability and the use of outcome indicators. A case study to continue a successful health counselling intervention.
    Jansen M; Harting J; Ebben N; Kroon B; Stappers J; Van Engelshoven E; de Vries N
    Fam Pract; 2008 Dec; 25 Suppl 1():i32-7. PubMed ID: 18836093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [The curriculum Health Technology Assessment (HTA)].
    Perleth M; Gerhardus A; Lühmann D; Rüther A;
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2006; 100(4):297-302. PubMed ID: 16878799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Collaborative and workflow-oriented digital portfolio: Creating a web-based tool to support a nationwide program of practices evaluation in the blood transfusion area.
    Staccini P; Hergon E; Joubert M; Fieschi M
    Int J Med Inform; 2007; 76(5-6):383-92. PubMed ID: 17291828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Comments by the Working Group for Methods of Economic Evaluation in Health Care (AG MEG) to IQWiG's Draft Guidelines "Methods for Assessment of the Relation of Benefits to Costs in the German Statutory Health Care System"].
    Krauth C; John J; Aidelsburger P; Brüggenjürgen B; Hansmeier T; Hessel F; Kohlmann T; Moock J; Rothgang H; Schweikert B; Seitz R; Wasem J;
    Gesundheitswesen; 2008 Jun; 70(6):e1-16. PubMed ID: 18661452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Criteria for the development and evaluation of decision aids].
    Kasper J; Lenz M
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2005; 99(6):359-65. PubMed ID: 16121651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Evidence-based medicine, or evidence research in everyday practice].
    Yernault JC
    Rev Med Brux; 1998 Jun; 19(3):115-7. PubMed ID: 9697392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluation of medical action and of action in public health. A clarification of concepts with special reference to quality of care.
    Grémy F
    Eff Health Care; 1983 Jun; 1(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 10310173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Making evidence-based decisions in medicine: (or more importantly) using evidence when the case doesn't quite fit.
    Flood AB
    Womens Health Issues; 2004; 14(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 15001181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluation concepts & methods: shaping policy for the health administrator.
    Nutt PC
    Health Syst Manage; 1981; 14():3-364. PubMed ID: 10296630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Opportunities of conventional evaluation in complementary and alternative medicine].
    Willich SN
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2005; 99(4-5):307-11. PubMed ID: 16044790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Is mental health services research in need of randomised controlled trials?].
    Kallert TW
    Psychiatr Prax; 2005 Nov; 32(8):375-7. PubMed ID: 16308799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Does health technology assessment benefit health services and politics? The experiences of an established HTA institution: the Danish Centre for Evaluation and HTA.
    Sigmund H; Kristensen FB
    Eur J Health Econ; 2002; 3(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 15609118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Responsive evaluation in health promotion: its value for ambiguous contexts.
    Abma TA
    Health Promot Int; 2005 Dec; 20(4):391-7. PubMed ID: 15972302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A scenario guideline for designing new teletreatments: a multidisciplinary approach.
    Huis in 't Veld RM; Widya IA; Bults RG; Sandsjö L; Hermens HJ; Vollenbroek-Hutten MM
    J Telemed Telecare; 2010; 16(6):302-7. PubMed ID: 20798423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The reality of applying an assessment guideline to a telemedicine mental health programme.
    Hailey D; Bulger T; Stayberg S; Urness D
    J Telemed Telecare; 2003; 9(6):344-8; discussion 348-9. PubMed ID: 14680519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. What can epidemiology contribute to comparative effectiveness research?
    Chubak J
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2013 Mar; 67(3):206-7. PubMed ID: 23180807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Revisiting a theory of negotiation: the utility of Markiewicz (2005) proposed six principles.
    McDonald D
    Eval Program Plann; 2008 Aug; 31(3):259-65. PubMed ID: 18486972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Challenges in evaluating telehealth through RCT-the problem of randomization.
    Sharma U; Reed J; Doyle C; Bell D
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 180():323-7. PubMed ID: 22874205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Some preliminary suggestions in the implementation of evaluation studies: for optimal control].
    Charpak Y
    Sante Publique; 1998 Jun; 10(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 9774920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.