These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16376188)

  • 1. Septal repair implants: evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging safety at 3 T.
    Shellock FG; Valencerina S
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Dec; 23(10):1021-5. PubMed ID: 16376188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A next-generation, flow-diverting implant used to treat brain aneurysms: in vitro evaluation of magnetic field interactions, heating and artifacts at 3-T.
    Karacozoff AM; Shellock FG; Wakhloo AK
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Jan; 31(1):145-9. PubMed ID: 22901731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of ossicular implants at 3 T.
    Shellock FG; Meepos LN; Stapleton MR; Valencerina S
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jul; 33(5):871-7. PubMed ID: 22643444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [MRI safety aspects and artifacts of atrial septal defect and patent foramen ovale occluders at 1.5 tesla: a phantom study].
    Bock M; Mohrs OK; Voigtlaender T; Kauczor HU; Semmler W
    Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):272-7. PubMed ID: 16508833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of MRI issues at 7 T for 28 implants and other objects.
    Dula AN; Virostko J; Shellock FG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Feb; 202(2):401-5. PubMed ID: 24450683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro assessment of 3-T MRI issues for a bioabsorbable, coronary artery scaffold with metallic markers.
    Shellock FG; Giangarra CJ
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Feb; 32(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 24315524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MRI Evaluation of an Atrial-Anchored Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Implant.
    Hatamifar A; Vasquez LP; Shellock FG; Chen J; Chambers J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Mar; 214(3):524-528. PubMed ID: 31939695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implantable microstimulator: magnetic resonance safety at 1.5 Tesla.
    Shellock FG; Cosendai G; Park SM; Nyenhuis JA
    Invest Radiol; 2004 Oct; 39(10):591-9. PubMed ID: 15377938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of MRI issues for a new neurological implant, the Sensor Reservoir.
    Shellock FG; Knebel J; Prat AD
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Sep; 31(7):1245-50. PubMed ID: 23602731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of MRI issues for the Argus II retinal prosthesis.
    Weiland JD; Faraji B; Greenberg RJ; Humayun MS; Shellock FG
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Apr; 30(3):382-9. PubMed ID: 22260934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cardiac pacemaker: in vitro assessment at 1.5 T.
    Shellock FG; Fieno DS; Thomson LJ; Talavage TM; Berman DS
    Am Heart J; 2006 Feb; 151(2):436-43. PubMed ID: 16442911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prosthetic heart valves: evaluation of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 1.5 T.
    Edwards MB; Taylor KM; Shellock FG
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2000 Aug; 12(2):363-9. PubMed ID: 10931602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of MRI issues for a new cerebral spinal fluid shunt, gravitational valve (GV).
    Moghtader D; Crawack HJ; Miethke C; Dörlemann Z; Shellock FG
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Dec; 44():8-14. PubMed ID: 28735732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro assessment of MRI issues at 3-Tesla for a breast tissue expander with a remote port.
    Linnemeyer H; Shellock FG; Ahn CY
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Apr; 32(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 24418326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Metallic neurosurgical implants: evaluation of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 1.5-Tesla.
    Shellock FG
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 Sep; 14(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 11536406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Metallic stents: evaluation of MR imaging safety.
    Shellock FG; Shellock VJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Sep; 173(3):543-7. PubMed ID: 10470877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of MRI issues at 3-Tesla for metallic surgical implants: findings applied to 61 additional skin closure staples and vessel ligation clips.
    Gill A; Shellock FG
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2012 Jan; 14(1):3. PubMed ID: 22230200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Drug eluting coronary stent: in vitro evaluation of magnet resonance safety at 3 Tesla.
    Shellock FG; Forder JR
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2005; 7(2):415-9. PubMed ID: 15881523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility and safety of the SOUNDTEC Direct System.
    Dyer RK; Nakmali D; Dormer KJ
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Aug; 116(8):1321-33. PubMed ID: 16885731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Percutaneous catheter closure of secundum atrial septal defects: a review.
    Ebeid MR
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2002 Jan; 14(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 11773692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.