These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16376188)

  • 41. Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging issues for a wirelessly powered lead used for epidural, spinal cord stimulation.
    Shellock FG; Audet-Griffin AJ
    Neuromodulation; 2014 Jun; 17(4):334-9; discussion 339. PubMed ID: 24024673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Transcatheter closure of intracardiac defects in adults.
    Kim MS; Klein AJ; Carroll JD
    J Interv Cardiol; 2007 Dec; 20(6):524-45. PubMed ID: 18042058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Amplatzer occluder versus CardioSEAL/STARFlex occluder: a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of transcatheter occlusion for patent foramen ovale and atrial septal defect.
    Li Y; Zhou K; Hua Y; Wang C; Xie L; Fang J; Rong X; Shen J
    Cardiol Young; 2013 Aug; 23(4):582-96. PubMed ID: 23199453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Finite volume analysis of temperature effects induced by active MRI implants: 2. Defects on active MRI implants causing hot spots.
    Busch MH; Vollmann W; Grönemeyer DH
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 May; 5():35. PubMed ID: 16729878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. MRI safety and imaging artifacts evaluated for a cannulated screw used for guided growth surgery.
    Thompson RM; Fowler E; Culo B; Shellock FG
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Feb; 66():219-225. PubMed ID: 31704394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Breast Tissue Expander With Radiofrequency Identification Port: Assessment of MRI Issues.
    Bayasgalan M; Munhoz AM; Shellock FG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jul; 215(1):159-164. PubMed ID: 32406774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. MRI interactions of a fully implantable pressure monitoring device.
    Stehlin EF; McCormick D; Malpas SC; Pontré BP; Heppner PA; Budgett DM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Nov; 42(5):1441-9. PubMed ID: 25865598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Biomedical implants and devices: assessment of magnetic field interactions with a 3.0-Tesla MR system.
    Shellock FG
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 Dec; 16(6):721-32. PubMed ID: 12451586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Transcatheter closure of multiple atrial septal defects. Initial results and value of two- and three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography.
    Cao Q; Radtke W; Berger F; Zhu W; Hijazi ZM
    Eur Heart J; 2000 Jun; 21(11):941-7. PubMed ID: 10806019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [High field MR imaging: magnetic field interactions of aneurysm clips, coronary artery stents and iliac artery stents with a 3.0 Tesla MR system].
    Sommer T; Maintz D; Schmiedel A; Hackenbroch M; Hofer U; Urbach H; Pavlidis C; Träber F; Schild H; Höher M
    Rofo; 2004 May; 176(5):731-8. PubMed ID: 15122473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. MRI Safety with Orthopedic Implants.
    Mosher ZA; Sawyer JR; Kelly DM
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2018 Oct; 49(4):455-463. PubMed ID: 30224007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Assessment of passive cardiovascular implant devices for MRI compatibility.
    Walsh EG; Brott BC; Johnson VY; Venugopalan R; Anayiotos A
    Technol Health Care; 2008; 16(4):233-45. PubMed ID: 18776600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison of three patent foramen ovale closure devices in a randomized trial (Amplatzer versus CardioSEAL-STARflex versus Helex occluder).
    Taaffe M; Fischer E; Baranowski A; Majunke N; Heinisch C; Leetz M; Hein R; Bayard Y; Büscheck F; Reschke M; Hoffmann I; Wunderlich N; Wilson N; Sievert H
    Am J Cardiol; 2008 May; 101(9):1353-8. PubMed ID: 18435971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Diverse experience with the CardioSEAL and STARFlex septal occluders.
    Apostolopoulou SC; Laskari CV; Kiaffas M; Papagiannis J; Rammos S
    Cardiol Young; 2004 Aug; 14(4):367-72. PubMed ID: 15680041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Evaluation of 39 medical implants at 7.0 T.
    Feng DX; McCauley JP; Morgan-Curtis FK; Salam RA; Pennell DR; Loveless ME; Dula AN
    Br J Radiol; 2015; 88(1056):20150633. PubMed ID: 26481696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. In vitro investigation of prosthetic heart valves in magnetic resonance imaging: evaluation of potential hazards.
    Pruefer D; Kalden P; Schreiber W; Dahm M; Buerke M; Thelen M; Oelert H
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 May; 10(3):410-4. PubMed ID: 11380110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Implantable spinal fusion stimulator: assessment of MR safety and artifacts.
    Shellock FG; Hatfield M; Simon BJ; Block S; Wamboldt J; Starewicz PM; Punchard WF
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2000 Aug; 12(2):214-23. PubMed ID: 10931583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Metallic surgical instruments for interventional MRI procedures: evaluation of MR safety.
    Shellock FG
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 Jan; 13(1):152-7. PubMed ID: 11169818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. New metallic implant used for permanent contraception in women: evaluation of MR safety.
    Shellock FG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jun; 178(6):1513-6. PubMed ID: 12034630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluation of MR safety for a new liquid embolic device.
    Audet-Griffin AJ; Pakbaz S; Shellock FG
    J Neurointerv Surg; 2014 Oct; 6(8):624-9. PubMed ID: 24142391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.