BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16376260)

  • 1. Health outcome measures in the evaluation of total hip arthroplasties--a comparison between the Harris hip score and the Oxford hip score.
    Kalairajah Y; Azurza K; Hulme C; Molloy S; Drabu KJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2005 Dec; 20(8):1037-41. PubMed ID: 16376260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Physical activity after total joint replacement: a cross-sectional survey.
    Bauman S; Williams D; Petruccelli D; Elliott W; de Beer J
    Clin J Sport Med; 2007 Mar; 17(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 17414477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validity of self-assessment outcome questionnaires: patient-physician discrepancy in outcome interpretation.
    Ragab AA
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2003; 39():579-84. PubMed ID: 12724955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing alternative Rasch-based methods vs raw scores in measuring change in health.
    Norquist JM; Fitzpatrick R; Dawson J; Jenkinson C
    Med Care; 2004 Jan; 42(1 Suppl):I25-36. PubMed ID: 14707753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Oxford hip score: the patient's perspective.
    Wylde V; Learmonth ID; Cavendish VJ
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2005 Oct; 3():66. PubMed ID: 16259627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Evaluating the quality of life before and after implantation of a total hip endoprosthesis].
    Knahr K; Kryspin-Exner I; Jagsch R; Freilinger W; Kasparek M
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1998; 136(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 9795434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between the Harris- and Oxford Hip Score to evaluate outcomes one-year after total hip arthroplasty.
    Weel H; Lindeboom R; Kuipers SE; Vervest TMJS
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2017 Mar; 83(1):98-109. PubMed ID: 29322902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison between patient recall and concurrent measurement of preoperative quality of life outcome in total hip arthroplasty.
    Howell J; Xu M; Duncan CP; Masri BA; Garbuz DS
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Sep; 23(6):843-9. PubMed ID: 18534515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do pain referral patterns determine patient outcome after total hip arthroplasty?
    Street J; Lenehan B; Flavin R; Beale E; Murray P
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2005 Oct; 71(5):540-7. PubMed ID: 16305078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient-reported outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasty: comparison of midterm results.
    Wylde V; Blom AW; Whitehouse SL; Taylor AH; Pattison GT; Bannister GC
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Feb; 24(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 18534427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Functional outcome evaluation after total hip arthroplasty].
    Kocić M; Lazović M; Kojović Z; Cutović M; Jović S; Vesović-Potić V
    Med Pregl; 2006; 59 Suppl 1():31-4. PubMed ID: 17361593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty: impacts on postoperative function and patients' satisfaction].
    Weng WJ; Wang F; Zhang HL; Qiu XS; Qiu Y
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2009 Dec; 22(12):906-8. PubMed ID: 20112570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of health-related quality of life after surgical treatment of focal symptomatic spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.
    Rampersaud YR; Ravi B; Lewis SJ; Stas V; Barron R; Davey R; Mahomed N
    Spine J; 2008; 8(2):296-304. PubMed ID: 17669690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patients' outcome after total hip arthroplasty: a comparison between the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities index and the Oxford 12-item hip score.
    Garbuz DS; Xu M; Sayre EC
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Oct; 21(7):998-1004. PubMed ID: 17027542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Categorization diminishes the reliability of hip scores.
    Bach CM; Feizelmeier H; Kaufmann G; Sununu T; Göbel G; Krismer M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Jun; (411):166-73. PubMed ID: 12782872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcome assessment in the elderly after total hip arthroplasty.
    Wood GC; McLauchlan GJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Apr; 21(3):398-404. PubMed ID: 16627149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of hip and knee arthroplasty outcomes at early and intermediate follow-up.
    O'Brien S; Bennett D; Doran E; Beverland DE
    Orthopedics; 2009 Mar; 32(3):168. PubMed ID: 19309063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cross-cultural adaptations of the Oxford-12 HIP score to the French speaking population.
    Delaunay C; Epinette JA; Dawson J; Murray D; Jolles BM
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Apr; 95(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 19345630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recovery of physical function and patient's satisfaction after total hip replacement (THR) surgery supported by a tailored guide-book.
    Fortina M; Carta S; Gambera D; Crainz E; Ferrata P; Maniscalco P
    Acta Biomed; 2005 Dec; 76(3):152-6. PubMed ID: 16676564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcomes after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: could we achieve better function?
    Newman MA; Barker KL; Pandit H; Murray DW
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Apr; 89(4):660-6. PubMed ID: 18373996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.