These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16376595)

  • 41. Identification of a minimal subset of receptor conformations for improved multiple conformation docking and two-step scoring.
    Yoon S; Welsh WJ
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 14741014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Ligand bias of scoring functions in structure-based virtual screening.
    Jacobsson M; Karlén A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(3):1334-43. PubMed ID: 16711752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Rescoring ligand docking poses.
    Zhong S; Zhang Y; Xiu Z
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2010 May; 13(3):326-34. PubMed ID: 20443166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Retrospective docking study of PDE4B ligands and an analysis of the behavior of selected scoring functions.
    Mpamhanga CP; Chen B; McLay IM; Ormsby DL; Lindvall MK
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(4):1061-74. PubMed ID: 16045302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. In silico fragment screening by replica generation (FSRG) method for fragment-based drug design.
    Fukunishi Y; Mashimo T; Orita M; Ohno K; Nakamura H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):925-33. PubMed ID: 19354203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Virtual screening strategies in drug discovery.
    McInnes C
    Curr Opin Chem Biol; 2007 Oct; 11(5):494-502. PubMed ID: 17936059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking.
    Huang SY; Zou X
    Proteins; 2007 Feb; 66(2):399-421. PubMed ID: 17096427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Drug efficiency indices for improvement of molecular docking scoring functions.
    García-Sosa AT; Hetényi C; Maran U
    J Comput Chem; 2010 Jan; 31(1):174-84. PubMed ID: 19422000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Towards in silico lead optimization: scores from ensembles of protein/ligand conformations reliably correlate with biological activity.
    Popov VM; Yee WA; Anderson AC
    Proteins; 2007 Feb; 66(2):375-87. PubMed ID: 17078091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Analysis of structure-based virtual screening studies and characterization of identified active compounds.
    Ripphausen P; Stumpfe D; Bajorath J
    Future Med Chem; 2012 Apr; 4(5):603-13. PubMed ID: 22458680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The consequences of scoring docked ligand conformations using free energy correlations.
    Spyrakis F; Amadasi A; Fornabaio M; Abraham DJ; Mozzarelli A; Kellogg GE; Cozzini P
    Eur J Med Chem; 2007 Jul; 42(7):921-33. PubMed ID: 17346861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Predicting multiple ligand binding modes using self-consistent pharmacophore hypotheses.
    Wallach I; Lilien R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Sep; 49(9):2116-28. PubMed ID: 19711952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Critical assessment of the automated AutoDock as a new docking tool for virtual screening.
    Park H; Lee J; Lee S
    Proteins; 2006 Nov; 65(3):549-54. PubMed ID: 16988956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. New scoring functions for virtual screening from molecular dynamics simulations with a quantum-refined force-field (QRFF-MD). Application to cyclin-dependent kinase 2.
    Ferrara P; Curioni A; Vangrevelinghe E; Meyer T; Mordasini T; Andreoni W; Acklin P; Jacoby E
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(1):254-63. PubMed ID: 16426061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Multiple-ligand-based virtual screening: methods and applications of the MTree approach.
    Hessler G; Zimmermann M; Matter H; Evers A; Naumann T; Lengauer T; Rarey M
    J Med Chem; 2005 Oct; 48(21):6575-84. PubMed ID: 16220974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. FieldChopper, a new tool for automatic model generation and virtual screening based on molecular fields.
    Kalliokoski T; Ronkko T; Poso A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Jun; 48(6):1131-7. PubMed ID: 18489083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Consensus scoring criteria for improving enrichment in virtual screening.
    Yang JM; Chen YF; Shen TW; Kristal BS; Hsu DF
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(4):1134-46. PubMed ID: 16045308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Rapid shape-based ligand alignment and virtual screening method based on atom/feature-pair similarities and volume overlap scoring.
    Sastry GM; Dixon SL; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Oct; 51(10):2455-66. PubMed ID: 21870862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Normalizing molecular docking rankings using virtually generated decoys.
    Wallach I; Jaitly N; Nguyen K; Schapira M; Lilien R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Aug; 51(8):1817-30. PubMed ID: 21699246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Maximum common binding modes (MCBM): consensus docking scoring using multiple ligand information and interaction fingerprints.
    Renner S; Derksen S; Radestock S; Mörchen F
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Feb; 48(2):319-32. PubMed ID: 18211051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.