BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16376736)

  • 1. Correspondence between patients' preferences and surrogates' understandings for dying and death.
    Engelberg RA; Patrick DL; Curtis JR
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2005 Dec; 30(6):498-509. PubMed ID: 16376736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Concordance of preferences for end-of-life care between terminally ill cancer patients and their family caregivers in Taiwan.
    Tang ST; Liu TW; Lai MS; Liu LN; Chen CH
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2005 Dec; 30(6):510-8. PubMed ID: 16376737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient and surrogate disagreement in end-of-life decisions: can surrogates accurately predict patients' preferences?
    Marks MA; Arkes HR
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(4):524-31. PubMed ID: 18566485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How do-not-resuscitate orders are utilized in cancer patients: timing relative to death and communication-training implications.
    Levin TT; Li Y; Weiner JS; Lewis F; Bartell A; Piercy J; Kissane DW
    Palliat Support Care; 2008 Dec; 6(4):341-8. PubMed ID: 19006588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preferences in end-of-life care of older persons: after-death interviews with proxy respondents.
    Klinkenberg M; Willems DL; Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD; Deeg DJ; van der Wal G
    Soc Sci Med; 2004 Dec; 59(12):2467-77. PubMed ID: 15474202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Knowledge, attitudes, and preferences regarding advance directives among patients of a managed care organization.
    Jackson JM; Rolnick SJ; Asche SE; Heinrich RL
    Am J Manag Care; 2009 Mar; 15(3):177-86. PubMed ID: 19298099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving advance care planning by accommodating family preferences.
    Hines SC; Glover JJ; Babrow AS; Holley JL; Badzek LA; Moss AH
    J Palliat Med; 2001; 4(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 11798480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Beyond substituted judgment: How surrogates navigate end-of-life decision-making.
    Vig EK; Taylor JS; Starks H; Hopley EK; Fryer-Edwards K
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2006 Nov; 54(11):1688-93. PubMed ID: 17087695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Families' and physicians' predictions of dialysis patients' preferences regarding life-sustaining treatments in Japan.
    Miura Y; Asai A; Matsushima M; Nagata S; Onishi M; Shimbo T; Hosoya T; Fukuhara S
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2006 Jan; 47(1):122-30. PubMed ID: 16377393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A voice for the dying.
    Meeker MA; Jezewski MA
    Clin Nurs Res; 2004 Nov; 13(4):326-42. PubMed ID: 15448283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Congruence of knowledge, experiences, and preferences for disclosure of diagnosis and prognosis between terminally-ill cancer patients and their family caregivers in Taiwan.
    Tang ST; Liu TW; Lai MS; Liu LN; Chen CH; Koong SL
    Cancer Invest; 2006; 24(4):360-6. PubMed ID: 16777687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating palliative care: bereaved family members' evaluations of patients' pain, anxiety and depression.
    McPherson CJ; Addington-Hall JM
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2004 Aug; 28(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 15276191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Medical decision making for patients without surrogates.
    Varma S; Wendler D
    Arch Intern Med; 2007 Sep; 167(16):1711-5. PubMed ID: 17846389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Life-sustaining treatment decisions: a social work response to meet needs of health care surrogates.
    Buckey JW; Abell N
    J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care; 2010; 6(1-2):27-50. PubMed ID: 20544476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. End-of-life decisions: family views on advance directives.
    Bernal EW; Marco CA; Parkins S; Buderer N; Thum SD
    Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 2007; 24(4):300-7. PubMed ID: 17582028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Advance directives and proxies' predictions about patients' treatment preferences.
    Barrio-Cantalejo IM; Molina-Ruiz A; Simón-Lorda P; Cámara-Medina C; Toral López I; del Mar Rodríguez del Aguila M; Bailón-Gómez RM
    Nurs Ethics; 2009 Jan; 16(1):93-109. PubMed ID: 19103694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Which factors have the greatest influence on bereaved families' willingness to execute advance directives in Taiwan?
    Yang CL; Chiu TY; Hsiung YF; Hu WY
    Cancer Nurs; 2011; 34(2):98-106. PubMed ID: 20885303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do patients' communication behaviors provide insight into their preferences for participation in decision making?
    Hudak PL; Frankel RM; Braddock C; Nisenbaum R; Luca P; McKeever C; Levinson W
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(3):385-93. PubMed ID: 18480043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using a Values Discussion Guide to facilitate communication in advance care planning.
    Karel MJ; Powell J; Cantor MD
    Patient Educ Couns; 2004 Oct; 55(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 15476986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The surrogate's experience in authorizing a do not resuscitate order.
    Handy CM; Sulmasy DP; Merkel CK; Ury WA
    Palliat Support Care; 2008 Mar; 6(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 18282340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.