These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16376736)

  • 21. Predictors of patient treatment preferences and spouse substituted judgments: the case of dialysis continuation.
    Pruchno RA; Lemay EP; Feild L; Levinsky NG
    Med Decis Making; 2006; 26(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 16525165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Advanced care planning: a study on home health nurses.
    Badzek LA; Leslie N; Schwertfeger RU; Deiriggi P; Glover J; Friend L
    Appl Nurs Res; 2006 May; 19(2):56-62. PubMed ID: 16728288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A prospective study of primary surrogate decision makers' knowledge of intensive care.
    Rodriguez RM; Navarrete E; Schwaber J; McKleroy W; Clouse A; Kerrigan SF; Fortman J
    Crit Care Med; 2008 May; 36(5):1633-6. PubMed ID: 18434916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Veterans' decision-making preferences and perceived involvement in care for chronic heart failure.
    Rodriguez KL; Appelt CJ; Switzer GE; Sonel AF; Arnold RM
    Heart Lung; 2008; 37(6):440-8. PubMed ID: 18992627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Medical information and surrogate designation: results of a prospective study in elderly hospitalised patients.
    Paillaud E; Ferrand E; Lejonc JL; Henry O; Bouillanne O; Montagne O
    Age Ageing; 2007 May; 36(3):274-9. PubMed ID: 17261528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Surrogates' perceptions about feeding tube placement decisions.
    Lewis CL; Hanson LC; Golin C; Garrett JM; Cox CE; Jackman A; Phifer N; Carey TS
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 May; 61(2):246-52. PubMed ID: 16503108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Making difficult decisions about hospice enrollment: what do patients and families want to know?
    Casarett D; Crowley R; Stevenson C; Xie S; Teno J
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2005 Feb; 53(2):249-54. PubMed ID: 15673348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Symptom distress and quality-of-life assessment at the end of life: the role of proxy response.
    Kutner JS; Bryant LL; Beaty BL; Fairclough DL
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2006 Oct; 32(4):300-10. PubMed ID: 17000347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Perspectives of healthy elders on advance care planning.
    Malcomson H; Bisbee S
    J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2009 Jan; 21(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 19125891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Projection in surrogate decisions about life-sustaining medical treatments.
    Fagerlin A; Ditto PH; Danks JH; Houts RM; Smucker WD
    Health Psychol; 2001 May; 20(3):166-75. PubMed ID: 11403214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. EfCCNa survey: European intensive care nurses' attitudes and beliefs towards end-of-life care.
    Latour JM; Fulbrook P; Albarran JW
    Nurs Crit Care; 2009; 14(3):110-21. PubMed ID: 19366408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How do surrogate decision makers describe hospice? Does it matter?
    Vig EK; Starks H; Taylor JS; Hopley EK; Fryer-Edwards K; Pearlman RA
    Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 2006; 23(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 16572746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The views and preferences of resuscitated and non-resuscitated patients towards family witnessed resuscitation: a qualitative study.
    McMahon-Parkes K; Moule P; Benger J; Albarran JW
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Jan; 46(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 18790478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Surrogates' agreement with patients' resuscitation preferences: effect of age, relationship, and SUPPORT intervention. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.
    Marbella AM; Desbiens NA; Mueller-Rizner N; Layde PM
    J Crit Care; 1998 Sep; 13(3):140-5. PubMed ID: 9758029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Agreement among family members in their assessment of the Quality of Dying and Death.
    Mularski R; Curtis JR; Osborne M; Engelberg RA; Ganzini L
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2004 Oct; 28(4):306-15. PubMed ID: 15471648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A Dyadic Perspective on Engagement in Advance Care Planning.
    Fried T; Zenoni M; Iannone L
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2017 Jan; 65(1):172-178. PubMed ID: 27910091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Surrogate decision-maker for end-of-life care in terminally ill patients at Chiang Mai University Hospital, Thailand.
    Sittisombut S; Inthong S
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2009 Apr; 15(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 19335530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hospitalisations at the end of life: using a sentinel surveillance network to study hospital use and associated patient, disease and healthcare factors.
    Van den Block L; Deschepper R; Drieskens K; Bauwens S; Bilsen J; Bossuyt N; Deliens L
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 May; 7():69. PubMed ID: 17488520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Family presence and environmental factors at the time of a patient's death in an ICU.
    Fridh I; Forsberg A; Bergbom I
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2007 Apr; 51(4):395-401. PubMed ID: 17378776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Concordance between patients' desired and actual decision-making roles in breast cancer care.
    Vogel BA; Helmes AW; Hasenburg A
    Psychooncology; 2008 Feb; 17(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 17534866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.