These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16376941)

  • 1. An ergonomic comparison of robotic and laparoscopic technique: the influence of surgeon experience and task complexity.
    Berguer R; Smith W
    J Surg Res; 2006 Jul; 134(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 16376941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ergonomic principles of task alignment, visual display, and direction of execution of laparoscopic bowel suturing.
    Emam TA; Hanna G; Cuschieri A
    Surg Endosc; 2002 Feb; 16(2):267-71. PubMed ID: 11967676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices.
    Chandra V; Nehra D; Parent R; Woo R; Reyes R; Hernandez-Boussard T; Dutta S
    Surgery; 2010 Jun; 147(6):830-9. PubMed ID: 20045162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performing laparoscopic surgery is significantly more stressful for the surgeon than open surgery.
    Berguer R; Smith WD; Chung YH
    Surg Endosc; 2001 Oct; 15(10):1204-7. PubMed ID: 11727101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of a robotic system as surgical first assistant in advanced laparoscopic surgery.
    Drasin T; Dutson E; Gracia C
    J Am Coll Surg; 2004 Sep; 199(3):368-73. PubMed ID: 15325605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An ergonomic study of the optimum operating table height for laparoscopic surgery.
    Berquer R; Smith WD; Davis S
    Surg Endosc; 2002 Mar; 16(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 11928019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of the physical effort required for laparoscopic and open surgical techniques.
    Berguer R; Chen J; Smith WD
    Arch Surg; 2003 Sep; 138(9):967-70. PubMed ID: 12963653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems.
    Dakin GF; Gagner M
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Apr; 17(4):574-9. PubMed ID: 12582769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Learning curves of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery: an experimental study evaluating skill acquisition of robot-assisted laparoscopic tasks compared with conventional laparoscopic tasks in inexperienced users.
    Heemskerk J; van Gemert WG; de Vries J; Greve J; Bouvy ND
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2007 Jun; 17(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 17581459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ergonomic assessment of the surgeon's physical workload during standard and robotic assisted laparoscopic procedures.
    Hubert N; Gilles M; Desbrosses K; Meyer JP; Felblinger J; Hubert J
    Int J Med Robot; 2013 Jun; 9(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 23529792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surgeon workload and motion efficiency with robot and human laparoscopic camera control.
    Kondraske GV; Hamilton EC; Scott DJ; Fischer CA; Tesfay ST; Taneja R; Brown RJ; Jones DB
    Surg Endosc; 2002 Nov; 16(11):1523-7. PubMed ID: 12098023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.
    Rozet F; Jaffe J; Braud G; Harmon J; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G
    J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of robotics and laparoscopy on surgical skills: A comparative study.
    Guru KA; Kuvshinoff BW; Pavlov-Shapiro S; Bienko MB; Aftab MN; Brady WE; Mohler JL
    J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Jan; 204(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 17189118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of precision and speed in laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgical task performance.
    Zihni A; Gerull WD; Cavallo JA; Ge T; Ray S; Chiu J; Brunt LM; Awad MM
    J Surg Res; 2018 Mar; 223():29-33. PubMed ID: 29433882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surgical robotics: impact of motion scaling on task performance.
    Prasad SM; Prasad SM; Maniar HS; Chu C; Schuessler RB; Damiano RJ
    J Am Coll Surg; 2004 Dec; 199(6):863-8. PubMed ID: 15555968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Virtual Instrumentation (VI) Laboratory facilitates customized on-site ergonomic analysis of minimally invasive surgery.
    Smith WD; Forkey DL; Berguer R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 50():240-5. PubMed ID: 10180547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. First year experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery with 153 cases in a general surgery department: indications, technique and results.
    Tomulescu V; Stănciulea O; Bălescu I; Vasile S; Tudor S; Gheorghe C; Vasilescu C; Popescu I
    Chirurgia (Bucur); 2009; 104(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 19499656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A virtual instrument ergonomics workstation for measuring the mental workload of performing video-endoscopic surgery.
    Smith WD; Chung YH; Berguer R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 70():309-15. PubMed ID: 10977562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic laparoscopic surgery with the da Vinci® system: an early experience.
    Spinoglio G; Summa M; Priora F; Quarati R; Testa S
    Surg Technol Int; 2009 Apr; 18():70-4. PubMed ID: 19579191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.