315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16377039)
1. Choosing an alpha radiation weighting factor for doses to non-human biota.
Chambers DB; Osborne RV; Garva AL
J Environ Radioact; 2006; 87(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 16377039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the application of a radiation weighting factor for alpha particles in protection of non-human biota.
Kocher DC; Trabalka JR
Health Phys; 2000 Oct; 79(4):407-11. PubMed ID: 11007463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relative biological effectiveness and radiation weighting factors in the context of animals and plants.
Higley KA; Kocher DC; Real AG; Chambers DB
Ann ICRP; 2012; 41(3-4):233-45. PubMed ID: 23089022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiation doses and risks from internal emitters.
Harrison J; Day P
J Radiol Prot; 2008 Jun; 28(2):137-59. PubMed ID: 18495991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The ICRP protection quantities, equivalent and effective dose: their basis and application.
Harrison JD; Streffer C
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 127(1-4):12-8. PubMed ID: 18003712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relative biological effectiveness (RBE), quality factor (Q), and radiation weighting factor (w(R)). A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.
Task Group on Radiation Quality Effects in Radiological Protection, Committee 1 on Radiation Effects, International Commission on Radiological Protection
Ann ICRP; 2003; 33(4):1-117. PubMed ID: 14614921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Harmonisation of individual monitoring in Europe.
Schumacher H; Phihet P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 112(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 15574984
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Implications of the new ICRP recommendations for aircrew dosimetry.
Dietze G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Oct; 136(4):240-3. PubMed ID: 19638445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. New ICRP recommendations.
Wrixon AD
J Radiol Prot; 2008 Jun; 28(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 18495983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. RBE and w(R) values of Auger emitters and low-range beta emitters with particular reference to tritium.
Fairlie I
J Radiol Prot; 2007 Jun; 27(2):157-68. PubMed ID: 17664661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comprehensive dose reconstruction methodology for former rocketdyne/atomics international radiation workers.
Boice JD; Leggett RW; Ellis ED; Wallace PW; Mumma M; Cohen SS; Brill AB; Chadda B; Boecker BB; Yoder RC; Eckerman KF
Health Phys; 2006 May; 90(5):409-30. PubMed ID: 16607174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurements of clinically significant doses of ionizing radiation using non-invasive in vivo EPR spectroscopy of teeth in situ.
Swartz HM; Iwasaki A; Walczak T; Demidenko E; Salikov I; Lesniewski P; Starewicz P; Schauer D; Romanyukha A
Appl Radiat Isot; 2005 Feb; 62(2):293-9. PubMed ID: 15607464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 2007 recommendations of the ICRP change basis for estimation of the effective dose: what is the impact on radiation dose assessment of patient and personnel?
Boetticher Hv; Lachmund J; Looe HK; Hoffmann W; Poppe B
Rofo; 2008 May; 180(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 18438741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rapporteur Report: ICNIRP international workshop on EMF dosimetry and biophysical aspects relevant to setting exposure guidelines.
Roy CR
Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):658-67. PubMed ID: 17495669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Weighting factors for radiation quality: how to unite the two current concepts.
Kellerer AM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):781-7. PubMed ID: 15353747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative radiation impact on biota and man in the area affected by the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant.
Fesenko SV; Alexakhin RM; Geras'kin SA; Sanzharova NI; Spirin YV; Spiridonov SI; Gontarenko IA; Strand P
J Environ Radioact; 2005; 80(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 15653184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of ICRP publication 92 on the conversion coefficients in use for cosmic ray dosimetry.
Pelliccioni M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(4):303-9. PubMed ID: 15273348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Applying DOE's Graded Approach for assessing radiation impacts to non-human biota at the INL.
Morris RC
J Environ Radioact; 2006; 87(1):77-100. PubMed ID: 16459178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Weighting of secondary radiations in organ dose calculations.
Siiskonen T; Tapiovaara M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Sep; 141(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 20478895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Requirements for reliable worst-case assessment of human exposure to RF electromagnetic fields with known uncertainty.
Christ A
Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):554-64. PubMed ID: 17495656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
