These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16377039)

  • 41. Quality control and reliability of reported doses.
    Stadtmann H; Figel M; Kamenopoulou V; Kluszczynski D; Roed H; Van Dijk J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 112(1):169-89. PubMed ID: 15574990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Usefulness and limits of biological dosimetry based on cytogenetic methods.
    Léonard A; Rueff J; Gerber GB; Léonard ED
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):448-54. PubMed ID: 16381765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Methods for calculating dose conversion coefficients for terrestrial and aquatic biota.
    Ulanovsky A; Pröhl G; Gómez-Ros JM
    J Environ Radioact; 2008 Sep; 99(9):1440-8. PubMed ID: 18329144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Radon exposure of the skin: I. Biological effects.
    Charles MW
    J Radiol Prot; 2007 Sep; 27(3):231-52. PubMed ID: 17768326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Radioactivity concentrations and dose assessment for soil samples from Kestanbol granite area, Turkey.
    Merdanoğlu B; Altinsoy N
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 16698965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. RBE and wR values of sparsely ionising radiations.
    Chadwwick KH; leenhouts HP
    J Radiol Prot; 2007 Dec; 27(4):503-4. PubMed ID: 18273998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Assessment of non-sinusoidal, pulsed, or intermittent exposure to low frequency electric and magnetic fields.
    Heinrich H
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):541-6. PubMed ID: 17495654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Questionnaire- and measurement-based individual thyroid doses in Ukraine resulting from the Chornobyl nuclear reactor accident.
    Likhtarev I; Bouville A; Kovgan L; Luckyanov N; Voillequé P; Chepurny M
    Radiat Res; 2006 Jul; 166(1 Pt 2):271-86. PubMed ID: 16808613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Background exposure rates of terrestrial wildlife in England and Wales.
    Beresford NA; Barnett CL; Jones DG; Wood MD; Appleton JD; Breward N; Copplestone D
    J Environ Radioact; 2008 Sep; 99(9):1430-9. PubMed ID: 18440107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The RBE for skin tumors and hair follicle damage in the rat following irradiation with alpha particles and electrons.
    Burns FJ; Albert RE; Heimbach RD
    Radiat Res; 1968 Nov; 36(2):225-41. PubMed ID: 17387942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Different basic dosimetric quantities for the characterization of exposure to low-frequency electric and magnetic fields and the implication for practical exposure conditions and guidelines.
    Martens L
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):515-20. PubMed ID: 17495651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. New recommendations from the International Commission on Radiological Protection--a review.
    Wrixon AD
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(8):R41-60. PubMed ID: 18364557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Extended conversion coefficients for use in radiation protection of the embryo and fetus against external neutrons from 10 MeV to 100 GeV.
    Chen J
    Health Phys; 2006 Mar; 90(3):223-31. PubMed ID: 16505619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The grand unification theory.
    McDonald JC
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 112(2):193-4. PubMed ID: 15591426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Validation process and uncertainty budget: a recommended approach for performance verification.
    Suárez RC; Zeger J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):52-5. PubMed ID: 18334543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Review of methods of dose estimation for epidemiological studies of the radiological impact of nevada test site and global fallout.
    Beck HL; Anspaugh LR; Bouville A; Simon SL
    Radiat Res; 2006 Jul; 166(1 Pt 2):209-18. PubMed ID: 16808609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. IAEA/IDEAS intercomparison exercise on internal dose assessment.
    Doerfel H; Andrasi A; Cruz-Suárez R; Castellani CM; Hurtgen C; Marsh J; Zeger J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):56-60. PubMed ID: 17351269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Radiation effectiveness factors for use in calculating probability of causation of radiogenic cancers.
    Kocher DC; Apostoaei AI; Hoffman FO
    Health Phys; 2005 Jul; 89(1):3-32. PubMed ID: 15951689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Sensitivity of different dose scoring methods on organ-specific neutron dose calculations in proton therapy.
    Jarlskog CZ; Paganetti H
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4523-32. PubMed ID: 18677040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Letter to the editor.
    Cox M; Desrosiers A; Wu CF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(3):397-8. PubMed ID: 18753361
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.