213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16377073)
1. Retroperitoneoscopic versus open surgical radical nephrectomy for large renal cell carcinoma in clinical stage cT2 or cT3a: quality of life, pain and reconvalescence.
Dillenburg W; Poulakis V; Skriapas K; de Vries R; Ferakis N; Witzsch U; Melekos M; Becht E
Eur Urol; 2006 Feb; 49(2):314-22; discussion 322-3. PubMed ID: 16377073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for large renal tumors: a long-term prospective comparison.
Hemal AK; Kumar A; Kumar R; Wadhwa P; Seth A; Gupta NP
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):862-6. PubMed ID: 17296361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cancer--a report of 43 cases].
Luo JH; Chen W; Chen LW; Sun XZ; Chen JX; Li XF; Mei H
Ai Zheng; 2007 Jun; 26(6):629-32. PubMed ID: 17562270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of hand assisted versus standard laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for suspected renal cell carcinoma.
Nelson CP; Wolf JS
J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):1989-94. PubMed ID: 11956425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of 200 patients.
Marszalek M; Meixl H; Polajnar M; Rauchenwald M; Jeschke K; Madersbacher S
Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1171-8. PubMed ID: 19232819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retroperitoneoscopic versus open surgical radical nephrectomy for 152 Chinese patients with large renal cell carcinoma in clinical stage cT2 or cT3a: A long-term retrospective comparison.
Zhu X; Yang X; Hu X; Zhang X
J Cancer Res Ther; 2016; 12(2):805-10. PubMed ID: 27461655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience.
Dunn MD; Portis AJ; Shalhav AL; Elbahnasy AM; Heidorn C; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2000 Oct; 164(4):1153-9. PubMed ID: 10992356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical experience with laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.
Tsujihata M; Nonomura N; Momohara C; Nishimura K; Tsujimura A; Okuyama A
Urol Int; 2008; 81(3):301-5. PubMed ID: 18931547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality of life and perioperative outcomes after retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy (RN), open RN and nephron-sparing surgery in patients with renal cell carcinoma.
Gratzke C; Seitz M; Bayrle F; Schlenker B; Bastian PJ; Haseke N; Bader M; Tilki D; Roosen A; Karl A; Reich O; Khoder WY; Wyler S; Stief CG; Staehler M; Bachmann A
BJU Int; 2009 Aug; 104(4):470-5. PubMed ID: 19239445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic radical versus partial nephrectomy for tumors >4 cm: intermediate-term oncologic and functional outcomes.
Simmons MN; Weight CJ; Gill IS
Urology; 2009 May; 73(5):1077-82. PubMed ID: 19394509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term follow-up of hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for organ-confined renal cell carcinoma.
Chung SD; Huang KH; Lai MK; Huang CY; Pu YS; Yu HJ; Chueh SC
Urology; 2007 Apr; 69(4):652-5. PubMed ID: 17445645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for the treatment of pathological T1N0M0 renal cell carcinoma: a 5-year survival rate.
Permpongkosol S; Bagga HS; Romero FR; Sroka M; Jarrett TW; Kavoussi LR
J Urol; 2006 Nov; 176(5):1984-8; discussion 1988-9. PubMed ID: 17070227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.
Desai MM; Strzempkowski B; Matin SF; Steinberg AP; Ng C; Meraney AM; Kaouk JH; Gill IS
J Urol; 2005 Jan; 173(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 15592021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hand assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal carcinoma using a new abdominal wall sealing device.
Tanaka M; Tokuda N; Koga H; Yokomizo A; Sakamoto N; Naito S
J Urol; 2000 Aug; 164(2):314-8. PubMed ID: 10893573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Single-incision, umbilical laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of convalescence.
Raman JD; Bagrodia A; Cadeddu JA
Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1198-204. PubMed ID: 18715694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of surgical margins in renal cell carcinoma after nephron sparing: a comparative study: laparoscopy vs open surgery.
Porpiglia F; Fiori C; Terrone C; Bollito E; Fontana D; Scarpa RM
J Urol; 2005 Apr; 173(4):1098-101. PubMed ID: 15758709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Open partial nephrectomy for imperative and elective indications comparison of peri-operative data and long-term follow-up.
Denzinger S; Ganzer R; Fink A; Wieland WF; Blana A
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2007; 41(6):496-500. PubMed ID: 17853016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with hilar lymph node dissection in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.
Simmons MN; Kaouk J; Gill IS; Fergany A
Urology; 2007 Jul; 70(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 17656205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective, randomized controlled study: transperitoneal laparoscopic versus retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy.
Nambirajan T; Jeschke S; Al-Zahrani H; Vrabec G; Leeb K; Janetschek G
Urology; 2004 Nov; 64(5):919-24. PubMed ID: 15533478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: surgical experience and outcomes.
Pyo P; Chen A; Grasso M
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1279-83. PubMed ID: 18707736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
