105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16378027)
21. Texture analysis of cervical cell nuclei by segmentation of chromatin patterns.
Smeulders AW; Leyte-Veldstra L; Ploem JS; Cornelisse CJ
J Histochem Cytochem; 1979 Jan; 27(1):199-203. PubMed ID: 374575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A clinical review of cervicography.
Turner MJ; Byrne BM; Flannelly G; Maguire P; Lenehan PM; Murphy JF
Ir J Med Sci; 1990 Feb; 159(2):50. PubMed ID: 2347680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Image Registration based Cervical Cancer Detection and Segmentation Using ANFIS Classifier.
Jaya BK; Kumar SS
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Nov; 19(11):3203-3209. PubMed ID: 30486611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Capabilities of nonlinear gradient and a thresholding algorithm for the segmentation of Papanicolaou-stained cervical cells.
Abmayr W; Abele L; Kugler J; Borst H
Anal Quant Cytol; 1980 Sep; 2(3):221-33. PubMed ID: 7425442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Cancer of the uterine cervix is the second most frequent gynecologic pathology in the world].
Thille A
JBR-BTR; 2003; 86(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 12807069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The influence of the b-value combination on apparent diffusion coefficient based differentiation between malignant and benign tissue in cervical cancer.
Hoogendam JP; Klerkx WM; de Kort GA; Bipat S; Zweemer RP; Sie-Go DM; Verheijen RH; Mali WP; Veldhuis WB
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Aug; 32(2):376-82. PubMed ID: 20677265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An image model and segmentation algorithm for reflectance confocal images of in vivo cervical tissue.
Luck BL; Carlson KD; Bovik AC; Richards-Kortum RR
IEEE Trans Image Process; 2005 Sep; 14(9):1265-76. PubMed ID: 16190463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Analysis of machine-selected cells with an image analysis system in normal and abnormal cervical specimens.
Stenkvist B; Strande G
Anal Cell Pathol; 1989 Dec; 2(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 2486906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Classifying cervical cells using a recurrent neural network by building basins of attraction.
Brouwer RK; MacAuley C
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1995 Jun; 17(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 7546054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Quantification of delineation errors of the gross tumor volume on magnetic resonance imaging in uterine cervical cancer using pathology data and deformation correction.
van de Schoot AJ; de Boer P; Buist MR; Stoker J; Bleeker MC; Stalpers LJ; Rasch CR; Bel A
Acta Oncol; 2015 Feb; 54(2):224-31. PubMed ID: 25437811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An automated method for segmentation of epithelial cervical cells in images of ThinPrep.
Harandi NM; Sadri S; Moghaddam NA; Amirfattahi R
J Med Syst; 2010 Dec; 34(6):1043-58. PubMed ID: 20703603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of Three Algorithms for the Segmentation of Overlapping Cervical Cells.
Lu Z; Carneiro G; Bradley AP; Ushizima D; Nosrati MS; Bianchi AGC; Carneiro CM; Hamarneh G
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2017 Mar; 21(2):441-450. PubMed ID: 26800556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Contextual analysis and intermediate cell markers enhance high-resolution cell image analysis for automated cervical smear diagnosis.
Zahniser DJ; Wong KL; Brenner JF; Ball HG; Garcia GL; Hutchinson ML
Cytometry; 1991; 12(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 1705494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Diffusion weighted imaging features of normal uterine cervix and cervical carcinoma].
Zhang Y; Liang BL; Gao L; Ye RX; Shen J; Zhong JL
Ai Zheng; 2007 May; 26(5):508-12. PubMed ID: 17672942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. RGB Channel Superposition Algorithm with Acetowhite Mask Images in a Cervical Cancer Classification Deep Learning Model.
Kim YJ; Ju W; Nam KH; Kim SN; Kim YJ; Kim KG
Sensors (Basel); 2022 May; 22(9):. PubMed ID: 35591254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Accuracy of nuclear classification in cervical smear images. Quantitative impact of computational deconvolution and 3-D feature computation.
Mackin RW; Newton LM; Turner JN; Holmes TJ; Roysam B
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1998 Apr; 20(2):77-91. PubMed ID: 9569965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of feature point detectors for multimodal image registration in plant phenotyping.
Henke M; Junker A; Neumann K; Altmann T; Gladilin E
PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0221203. PubMed ID: 31568494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Digital tools for collecting data from cervigrams for research and training in colposcopy.
Jeronimo J; Long LR; Neve L; Michael B; Antani S; Schiffman M
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2006 Jan; 10(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 16378028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Interobserver agreement in the evaluation of digitized cervical images.
Jeronimo J; Massad LS; Castle PE; Wacholder S; Schiffman M;
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Oct; 110(4):833-40. PubMed ID: 17906017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Accurate Segmentation of Cervical Cytoplasm and Nuclei Based on Multiscale Convolutional Network and Graph Partitioning.
Song Y; Zhang L; Chen S; Ni D; Lei B; Wang T
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Oct; 62(10):2421-33. PubMed ID: 25966470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
