These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1637970)

  • 1. Relative risk trees for censored survival data.
    LeBlanc M; Crowley J
    Biometrics; 1992 Jun; 48(2):411-25. PubMed ID: 1637970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Piecewise exponential survival trees with time-dependent covariates.
    Huang X; Chen S; Soong SJ
    Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1420-33. PubMed ID: 9883542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multivariate survival trees: a maximum likelihood approach based on frailty models.
    Su X; Fan J
    Biometrics; 2004 Mar; 60(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 15032778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modified particle swarm optimization algorithm for adaptively configuring globally optimal classification and regression trees.
    Zhou YP; Tang LJ; Jiao J; Song DD; Jiang JH; Yu RQ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 May; 49(5):1144-53. PubMed ID: 19366194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prognostic groups in colorectal carcinoma patients based on tumor cell proliferation and classification and regression tree (CART) survival analysis.
    Valera VA; Walter BA; Yokoyama N; Koyama Y; Iiai T; Okamoto H; Hatakeyama K
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Jan; 14(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 17024555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prognostic variables and prognostic groups for malignant melanoma. The information from Cox and Classification And Regression Trees analysis: an Italian population-based study.
    Crocetti E; Mangone L; Lo Scocco G; Carli P
    Melanoma Res; 2006 Oct; 16(5):429-33. PubMed ID: 17013092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adaptive risk group refinement.
    LeBlanc M; Moon J; Crowley J
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):370-8. PubMed ID: 16011683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A partitioning deletion/substitution/addition algorithm for creating survival risk groups.
    Lostritto K; Strawderman RL; Molinaro AM
    Biometrics; 2012 Dec; 68(4):1146-56. PubMed ID: 22519965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk stratification for LDL cholesterol using induction technique.
    Ho SH; Park HY; Jang YS; Jee SH
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 129(Pt 1):571-5. PubMed ID: 17911781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing influence in regression analysis with censored data.
    Escobar LA; Meeker WQ
    Biometrics; 1992 Jun; 48(2):507-28. PubMed ID: 1637975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A step-up procedure for selecting variables associated with survival.
    Krall JM; Uthoff VA; Harley JB
    Biometrics; 1975 Mar; 31(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 1164538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tree-structured survival analysis.
    Gordon L; Olshen RA
    Cancer Treat Rep; 1985 Oct; 69(10):1065-9. PubMed ID: 4042086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Regression analysis of doubly censored failure time data with frailty.
    Kim YJ
    Biometrics; 2006 Jun; 62(2):458-64. PubMed ID: 16918909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Classification and regression tree analysis of 1000 consecutive patients with unknown primary carcinoma.
    Hess KR; Abbruzzese MC; Lenzi R; Raber MN; Abbruzzese JL
    Clin Cancer Res; 1999 Nov; 5(11):3403-10. PubMed ID: 10589751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the quality of tree-based protein classification.
    Lazareva-Ulitsky B; Diemer K; Thomas PD
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1876-90. PubMed ID: 15647305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An empirical comparison of multivariable methods for estimating risk of death from coronary heart disease.
    Knuiman MW; Vu HT; Segal MR
    J Cardiovasc Risk; 1997 Apr; 4(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 9304494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Induced smoothing for rank regression with censored survival times.
    Brown BM; Wang YG
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):828-36. PubMed ID: 16646005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Understanding neural networks using regression trees: an application to multiple myeloma survival data by D. Faraggi, M. LeBlanc and J. Crowley, Statistics in Medicine 2001; 20:2965-2976.
    Marshall RJ
    Stat Med; 2003 Feb; 22(4):661; author reply 661-2. PubMed ID: 12590420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An approximate likelihood procedure for censored data.
    Oakes D
    Biometrics; 1986 Mar; 42(1):177-82. PubMed ID: 3719053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Survival of patients with nonseminomatous germ cell cancer: a review of the IGCC classification by Cox regression and recursive partitioning.
    van Dijk MR; Steyerberg EW; Stenning SP; Dusseldorp E; Habbema JD
    Br J Cancer; 2004 Mar; 90(6):1176-83. PubMed ID: 15026798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.