These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16380181)

  • 1. Interface of biotechnology and ecology for environmental risk assessments of transgenic fish.
    Devlin RH; Sundström LF; Muir WM
    Trends Biotechnol; 2006 Feb; 24(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 16380181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Progress in the evaluation of transgenic fish for possible ecological risk and its containment strategies.
    Hu W; Wang Y; Zhu Z
    Sci China C Life Sci; 2007 Oct; 50(5):573-9. PubMed ID: 17879053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Safety evaluation of food from transgenic fish and the molecular biological mechanism].
    Zhang X; Yang X
    Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2004 Mar; 33(2):233-6. PubMed ID: 15209016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transgenic fish resistant to infectious diseases, their risk and prevention of escape into the environment and future candidate genes for disease transgene manipulation.
    Dunham RA
    Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis; 2009 Mar; 32(2):139-61. PubMed ID: 18249446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transgenic species. Engineered fish: friend or foe of the environment?
    Stokstad E
    Science; 2002 Sep; 297(5588):1797-9. PubMed ID: 12228699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Progress in transgenic fish techniques and application].
    Ye X; Tian YY; Gao FY
    Yi Chuan; 2011 May; 33(5):494-503. PubMed ID: 21586396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integration mechanisms of transgenes and population fitness of GH transgenic fish.
    Hu W; Zhu Z
    Sci China Life Sci; 2010 Apr; 53(4):401-8. PubMed ID: 20596905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Landscape genetic analyses reveal cryptic population structure and putative selection gradients in a large-scale estuarine environment.
    McCairns RJ; Bernatchez L
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Sep; 17(17):3901-16. PubMed ID: 18662229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gene-environment interactions influence ecological consequences of transgenic animals.
    Sundström LF; Lõhmus M; Tymchuk WE; Devlin RH
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2007 Mar; 104(10):3889-94. PubMed ID: 17360448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating genetic containment strategies for transgenic plants.
    Lee D; Natesan E
    Trends Biotechnol; 2006 Mar; 24(3):109-14. PubMed ID: 16460821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Current scientific understanding of the environmental biosafety of transgenic fish and shellfish.
    Kapuscinski AR
    Rev Sci Tech; 2005 Apr; 24(1):309-22. PubMed ID: 16110898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetic and ecological consequences of transgene flow to the wild flora.
    Felber F; Kozlowski G; Arrigo N; Guadagnuolo R
    Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2007; 107():173-205. PubMed ID: 17522826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Transgenic fishes: modern state of the problem].
    Isaeva NM; Morozov-Leonov SIu
    Tsitol Genet; 2007; 41(4):72-9. PubMed ID: 18030730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The evolutionary consequences of ecological interactions mediated through phenotypic plasticity.
    Fordyce JA
    J Exp Biol; 2006 Jun; 209(Pt 12):2377-83. PubMed ID: 16731814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integration of chromosome set manipulation and transgenic technologies for fishes.
    Thorgaard GH; Scheerer PD; Zhang J
    Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol; 1992; 1(4-5):251-6. PubMed ID: 1308814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic engineering of Minnesota superfish.
    Hackett PB
    SAAS Bull Biochem Biotechnol; 1996; 9():69-76. PubMed ID: 8652135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new kind of fish story. The coming of biotech animals.
    Lewis C
    FDA Consum; 2001; 35(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 11930918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Problems in the introduction of genetically engineered microorganisms into the environment.
    Gorlach K
    Acta Microbiol Pol; 1994; 43(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 7530892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Alternate Directed Anthropogenic Shifts in Genotype Result in Different Ecological Outcomes in Coho Salmon Oncorhynchus kisutch Fry.
    Leggatt RA; Sundström LF; Vandersteen WE; Devlin RH
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148687. PubMed ID: 26848575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.