These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16381067)

  • 1. Statistical inference for correlated data in ophthalmologic studies.
    Tang ML; Tang NS; Rosner B
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2771-83. PubMed ID: 16381067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exact and approximate unconditional confidence intervals for proportion difference in the presence of incomplete data.
    Tang ML; Ling MH; Tian GL
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 19035467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing the non-unity of rate ratio under inverse sampling.
    Tang ML; Liao YJ; Ng HK; Chan PS
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(4):551-64. PubMed ID: 17621387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Confidence interval construction for proportion difference in small-sample paired studies.
    Tang ML; Tang NS; Chan IS
    Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(23):3565-79. PubMed ID: 16261646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Asymptotic confidence interval construction for proportion difference in medical studies with bilateral data.
    Tang NS; Qiu SF; Tang ML; Pei YB
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2011 Jun; 20(3):233-59. PubMed ID: 20181778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A permutation test for inference in logistic regression with small- and moderate-sized data sets.
    Potter DM
    Stat Med; 2005 Mar; 24(5):693-708. PubMed ID: 15515134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal analysis of incomplete longitudinal binary data: a cautionary note on LOCF imputation.
    Cook RJ; Zeng L; Yi GY
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):820-8. PubMed ID: 15339307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On tests of rate ratio under standard inverse sampling.
    Tang ML; Liao YJ; Ng HK
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Mar; 89(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 18164512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Test procedures for disease prevalence with partially validated data.
    Tang ML; Qiu SF; Poon WY; Tang NS
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(2):368-86. PubMed ID: 22251180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new non-randomized model for analysing sensitive questions with binary outcomes.
    Tian GL; Yu JW; Tang ML; Geng Z
    Stat Med; 2007 Oct; 26(23):4238-52. PubMed ID: 17351882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical methods in ophthalmology: an adjusted chi-square approach.
    Donner A
    Biometrics; 1989 Jun; 45(2):605-11. PubMed ID: 2765640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interpreting statistical evidence with empirical likelihood functions.
    Zhang Z
    Biom J; 2009 Aug; 51(4):710-20. PubMed ID: 19650056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Imputation strategies for missing continuous outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
    Taljaard M; Donner A; Klar N
    Biom J; 2008 Jun; 50(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 18537126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Expected estimating equations for missing data, measurement error, and misclassification, with application to longitudinal nonignorable missing data.
    Wang CY; Huang Y; Chao EC; Jeffcoat MK
    Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 17608787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Significance testing for correlated binary outcome data.
    Rosner B; Milton RC
    Biometrics; 1988 Jun; 44(2):505-12. PubMed ID: 3390508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A likelihood approach to estimating sensitivity and specificity for binocular data: application in ophthalmology.
    de Leon AR; Guo M; Rudnisky CJ; Singh G
    Stat Med; 2007 Jul; 26(17):3300-14. PubMed ID: 17211837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test under scrutiny.
    Fagerland MW; Sandvik L
    Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(10):1487-97. PubMed ID: 19247980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment on homogeneity tests for kappa statistics under equal prevalence across studies in reliability.
    Nam JM
    Stat Med; 2006 May; 25(9):1521-31. PubMed ID: 16220477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Structural inference in transition measurement error models for longitudinal data.
    Pan W; Lin X; Zeng D
    Biometrics; 2006 Jun; 62(2):402-12. PubMed ID: 16918904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Confidence intervals of effect size for paired studies.
    Wu J; Jiang G
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(5):765-73. PubMed ID: 17634978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.