BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16381705)

  • 1. Virtual commissioning of a treatment planning system for proton therapy of ocular cancers.
    Koch N; Newhauser W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):159-63. PubMed ID: 16381705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monte Carlo simulations for configuring and testing an analytical proton dose-calculation algorithm.
    Newhauser W; Fontenot J; Zheng Y; Polf J; Titt U; Koch N; Zhang X; Mohan R
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(15):4569-84. PubMed ID: 17634651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Therapeutic step and shoot proton beam spot-scanning with a multi-leaf collimator: a Monte Carlo study.
    Bues M; Newhauser WD; Titt U; Smith AR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):164-9. PubMed ID: 16381706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monte Carlo simulations of a nozzle for the treatment of ocular tumours with high-energy proton beams.
    Newhauser W; Koch N; Hummel S; Ziegler M; Titt U
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Nov; 50(22):5229-49. PubMed ID: 16264250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An efficient framework for photon Monte Carlo treatment planning.
    Fix MK; Manser P; Frei D; Volken W; Mini R; Born EJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(19):N425-37. PubMed ID: 17881793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peripheral dose in ocular treatments with CyberKnife and Gamma Knife radiosurgery compared to proton radiotherapy.
    Zytkovicz A; Daftari I; Phillips TL; Chuang CF; Verhey L; Petti PL
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(19):5957-71. PubMed ID: 17881812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new human eye model for ophthalmic brachytherapy dosimetry.
    Yoriyaz H; Sanchez A; dos Santos A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):316-9. PubMed ID: 16381737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monte Carlo investigation of collimator scatter of proton-therapy beams produced using the passive scattering method.
    Titt U; Zheng Y; Vassiliev ON; Newhauser WD
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(2):487-504. PubMed ID: 18185001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microdosimetry distributions for 40-200 MeV protons.
    Palajová Z; Spurný F; Davídková M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):376-81. PubMed ID: 16782987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New internal radiation dose and modeling software; FDA approves commercial MIRDOSE successor.
    J Nucl Med; 2004 Nov; 45(11):26N, 28N. PubMed ID: 15584137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A filtering approach based on Gaussian-powerlaw convolutions for local PET verification of proton radiotherapy.
    Parodi K; Bortfeld T
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 51(8):1991-2009. PubMed ID: 16585841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms for treatment planning in external photon beam therapy for clinical situations.
    Knöös T; Wieslander E; Cozzi L; Brink C; Fogliata A; Albers D; Nyström H; Lassen S
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(22):5785-807. PubMed ID: 17068365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of a commercial VMC++ Monte Carlo based treatment planning system for electron beams using EGSnrc/BEAMnrc simulations and measurements.
    Edimo P; Clermont C; Kwato MG; Vynckier S
    Phys Med; 2009 Sep; 25(3):111-21. PubMed ID: 18722148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 106Ru/106Rh plaque and proton radiotherapy for ocular melanoma: a comparative dosimetric study.
    Mourtada F; Koch N; Newhauser W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 116(1-4 Pt 2):454-60. PubMed ID: 16604677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intrafractional motion during proton beam scanning.
    Lambert J; Suchowerska N; McKenzie DR; Jackson M
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(20):4853-62. PubMed ID: 16204877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Commissioning stereotactic radiosurgery beams using both experimental and theoretical methods.
    Ding GX; Duggan DM; Coffey CW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2549-66. PubMed ID: 16675869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of PENELOPE Monte Carlo dose calculations with Fricke dosimeter and ionization chamber measurements in heterogeneous phantoms (18 MeV electron and 12 MV photon beams).
    Blazy L; Baltes D; Bordy JM; Cutarella D; Delaunay F; Gouriou J; Leroy E; Ostrowsky A; Beaumont S
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(22):5951-65. PubMed ID: 17068376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microdosimetric investigation at the therapeutic proton beam facility of CATANA.
    De Nardo L; Moro D; Colautti P; Conte V; Tornielli G; Cuttone G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):681-6. PubMed ID: 15353730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical implementation of enhanced dynamic wedges into the Pinnacle treatment planning system: Monte Carlo validation and patient-specific QA.
    Ahmad M; Deng J; Lund MW; Chen Z; Kimmett J; Moran MS; Nath R
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jan; 54(2):447-65. PubMed ID: 19098353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Test of the nuclear interaction model in SHIELD-HIT and comparison to energy distributions from GEANT4.
    Henkner K; Sobolevsky N; Jäkel O; Paganetti H
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Nov; 54(22):N509-17. PubMed ID: 19864697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.