These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16381733)
1. Bremsstrahlung doses from natural uranium ingots. Anderson JL; Hertel NE Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):298-301. PubMed ID: 16381733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MDA improvement technique for lung counter measurements of uranium workers. Pelled O; German U; Pollak G; Tshuva A Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):496-9. PubMed ID: 17355982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A time-dependent dose model for glovebox processing of fissile material. Wooten HO; Dudziak DJ; Hertel NE; Kornreich DE Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):350-6. PubMed ID: 16381745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Internal dose assessment of natural uranium from drinking water based on biokinetic modeling and individual bioassay monitoring: a study of a Finnish family. Li WB; Salonen L; Muikku M; Wahl W; Höllriegl V; Oeh U; Roth P; Rahola T Health Phys; 2006 Jun; 90(6):533-43. PubMed ID: 16691101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comprehensive dose reconstruction methodology for former rocketdyne/atomics international radiation workers. Boice JD; Leggett RW; Ellis ED; Wallace PW; Mumma M; Cohen SS; Brill AB; Chadda B; Boecker BB; Yoder RC; Eckerman KF Health Phys; 2006 May; 90(5):409-30. PubMed ID: 16607174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of occupational exposure to uranium by indirect methods needs information on natural background variations. Muikku M; Heikkinen T; Puhakainen M; Rahola T; Salonen L Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):492-5. PubMed ID: 17309870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Applications of Capstone depleted uranium aerosol risk data to military combat risk management. Daxon EG; Parkhurst MA; Melanson MA; Roszell LE Health Phys; 2009 Mar; 96(3):380-92. PubMed ID: 19204493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Application of workplace correction factors to dosemeter results for the assessment of personal doses at nuclear facilities. Lindborg L; Bolognese-Milsztajn T; Boschung M; Coeck M; Curzio G; d'Errico F; Fiechtner A; Hallfarth D; Lievens B; Lillhök JE; Lövefors-Daun A; Lacoste V; Luszik-Bhadra M; Reginatto M; Schuhmacher H; Tanner R; Vanhavere F Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 124(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 17893081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Natural radioactivity in some building materials in Cuba and their contribution to the indoor gamma dose rate. Flores OB; Estrada AM; Zerquera JT Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(2):218-22. PubMed ID: 15572398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Monte Carlo simulation of the operational quantities at the realistic mixed neutron-photon radiation fields CANEL and SIGMA. Lacoste V; Gressier V Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):185-8. PubMed ID: 17578872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of environmental radioactivity at uranium mining, processing and tailings management facility at Jaduguda, India. Tripathi RM; Sahoo SK; Jha VN; Khan AH; Puranik VD Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Nov; 66(11):1666-70. PubMed ID: 18653352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Aspects of operational radiation protection during dismantling of nuclear facilities relevant for the estimation of internal doses. Labarta T Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 124(3):260-5. PubMed ID: 17951606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inhalation and ingestion intakes with associated dose estimates for level II and level III personnel using Capstone study data. Szrom F; Falo GA; Lodde GM; Parkhurst MA; Daxon EG Health Phys; 2009 Mar; 96(3):363-79. PubMed ID: 19204492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A statistical model for reconstruction of historical internal doses for uranium workers. Kravchik T; German U Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Sep; 136(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 19687132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiation dose to PET technologists and strategies to lower occupational exposure. Roberts FO; Gunawardana DH; Pathmaraj K; Wallace A; U PL; Mi T; Berlangieri SU; O'Keefe GJ; Rowe CC; Scott AM J Nucl Med Technol; 2005 Mar; 33(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 15731021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The annual effective dose from natural sources of ionising radiation in Canada. Grasty RL; LaMarre JR Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 108(3):215-26. PubMed ID: 15031443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterisation of radioactive waste products associated with plant decommissioning. Sejvar J; Fero AH; Gil C; Hagler RJ; Santiago JL; Holgado A; Swenson R Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):481-5. PubMed ID: 16381771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Occupational radiation exposure to norms in a gold mine. Darko EO; Tetteh GK; Akaho EH Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(4):538-45. PubMed ID: 15914510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]