169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16381742)
1. Evaluation of patient dose for mammography in Pernambuco, Brazil.
Khoury HJ; Barros VS; Lopes C
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):337-9. PubMed ID: 16381742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a selenium flat-panel detector].
Gosch D; Jendrass S; Scholz M; Kahn T
Rofo; 2006 Jul; 178(7):693-7. PubMed ID: 16761214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the entrance surface air kerma in mammographic examinations in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Oliveira LC; Dias TK; Lopes RT; Kodlulovich S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Feb; 133(3):136-43. PubMed ID: 19287013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The performance of commercial photodiodes for dosimetry in mammography.
Batista E; Khoury HJ; Melo FA; Barros V; da Silva EF
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):391-3. PubMed ID: 16381752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dose area product reference levels in dental panoramic radiology.
Tierris CE; Yakoumakis EN; Bramis GN; Georgiou E
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):283-7. PubMed ID: 15266083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient dose in digital mammography.
Chevalier M; Morán P; Ten JI; Fernández Soto JM; Cepeda T; Vañó E
Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2471-9. PubMed ID: 15487727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effective dose to patient during cardiac interventional procedures (Prague workplaces).
Stisova V
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):271-4. PubMed ID: 15266088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mammography radiation dose: initial results from Serbia based on mean glandular dose assessment for phantoms and patients.
Ciraj-Bjelac O; Beciric S; Arandjic D; Kosutic D; Kovacevic M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Jun; 140(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 20159918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of subject contrast and normalized average glandular dose by semi-analytical models.
Tomal A; Poletti ME; Caldas LV
Appl Radiat Isot; 2010; 68(4-5):755-9. PubMed ID: 19836251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intra-individual comparison of average glandular dose of two digital mammography units using different anode/filter combinations.
Engelken FJ; Meyer H; Juran R; Bick U; Fallenberg E; Diekmann F
Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1272-80. PubMed ID: 19632866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient dose measurements in diagnostic radiology procedures in Korea.
Kim YH; Choi JH; Kim CK; Kim JM; Kim SS; Oh YW; Lee CY; Kang DH; Lee YB; Cho PK; Kim HC; Kim CM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 123(4):540-5. PubMed ID: 17223642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiation shielding technology.
Shultis JK; Faw RE
Health Phys; 2005 Jun; 88(6):587-612. PubMed ID: 15891456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Forward-scattered radiation from the compression paddle should be considered in glandular dose estimations.
Hemdal B
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):196-201. PubMed ID: 21778158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Variations in breast doses for an automatic mammography unit.
Bor D; Tükel S; Olgar T; Aydin E
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2008 Sep; 14(3):122-6. PubMed ID: 18814131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. First results on patient dose measurements from conventional diagnostic radiology procedures in Serbia and Montenegro.
Ciraj O; Marković S; Kosutić D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(3):330-5. PubMed ID: 15755772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ambient dose equivalent and effective dose from scattered x-ray spectra in mammography for Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh and W/Rh anode/filter combinations.
Künzel R; Herdade SB; Costa PR; Terini RA; Levenhagen RS
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 51(8):2077-91. PubMed ID: 16585846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monte Carlo estimation of radiation doses in red bone marrow and breast in common pediatric x-ray examinations.
Gialousis GI; Yakoumakis EN; Dimitriadis AI; Papouli ZK; Yakoumakis NE; Tsalafoutas IA; Papadopoulou DI; Georgiou EK
Health Phys; 2008 Sep; 95(3):331-6. PubMed ID: 18695414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Method for the evaluation of a average glandular dose in mammography.
Okunade AA
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1153-64. PubMed ID: 16696493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiation shielding technology.
Shultis JK; Faw RE
Health Phys; 2005 Apr; 88(4):297-322. PubMed ID: 15761292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimisation of X-ray examinations in Lithuania: start of implementation in mammography.
Adliene D; Adlys G; Cerapaite R; Jonaitiene E; Cibulskaite I
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):399-402. PubMed ID: 15933145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
