1982 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16381765)
1. Usefulness and limits of biological dosimetry based on cytogenetic methods.
Léonard A; Rueff J; Gerber GB; Léonard ED
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):448-54. PubMed ID: 16381765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of cytogenetic indicators in radiobiology.
Rodrigues AS; Oliveira NG; Gil OM; Léonard A; Rueff J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):455-60. PubMed ID: 16381766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cytogenetic methods for biodosimetry and risk individualisation after exposure to ionising radiation.
Terzoudi GI; Pantelias GE
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 122(1-4):513-20. PubMed ID: 17169946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do recorded doses overestimate true doses received by Chernobyl cleanup workers? Results of cytogenetic analyses of Estonian workers by fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Littlefield LG; McFee AF; Salomaa SI; Tucker JD; Inskip PD; Sayer AM; Lindholm C; Mäkinen S; Mustonen R; Sorensen K; Tekkel M; Veidebaum T; Auvinen A; Boice JD
Radiat Res; 1998 Aug; 150(2):237-49. PubMed ID: 9692369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Possibilities and limitations of fluorescence in situ hybridization technique in retrospective detection of low dose radiation exposure in post-chernobyl human cohorts.
Maznyk NA; Vinnikov VA
Tsitol Genet; 2005; 39(4):25-31. PubMed ID: 16396328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of chromosome aberrations by FISH and Giemsa assays in lymphocytes of cancer patients undergoing whole-body irradiation: comparison of in vivo and in vitro irradiation.
Vorobtsova I; Darroudi F; Semyonov A; Kanayeva A; Timofeyeva N; Yakovleva T; Zharinov G; Natarajan AT
Int J Radiat Biol; 2001 Nov; 77(11):1123-31. PubMed ID: 11683983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comprehensive dose reconstruction methodology for former rocketdyne/atomics international radiation workers.
Boice JD; Leggett RW; Ellis ED; Wallace PW; Mumma M; Cohen SS; Brill AB; Chadda B; Boecker BB; Yoder RC; Eckerman KF
Health Phys; 2006 May; 90(5):409-30. PubMed ID: 16607174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retrospective assessment of radiation exposure using biological dosimetry: chromosome painting, electron paramagnetic resonance and the glycophorin a mutation assay.
Kleinerman RA; Romanyukha AA; Schauer DA; Tucker JD
Radiat Res; 2006 Jul; 166(1 Pt 2):287-302. PubMed ID: 16808614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of radiation damage-the need for a multiparametric and integrative approach with the help of both clinical and biological dosimetry.
Riecke A; Ruf CG; Meineke V
Health Phys; 2010 Feb; 98(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 20065678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A cytogenetic follow-up of some highly irradiated victims of the Chernobyl accident.
Sevan'kaev AV; Lloyd DC; Edwards AA; Khvostunov IK; Mikhailova GF; Golub EV; Shepel NN; Nadejina NM; Galstian IA; Nugis VY; Barrios L; Caballin MR; Barquinero JF
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(2):152-61. PubMed ID: 15572397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of spectral karyotyping (SKY) in biodosimetry for the triage situation following gamma irradiation.
Szeles A; Joussineau S; Lewensohn R; Lagercrantz S; Larsson C
Int J Radiat Biol; 2006 Feb; 82(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 16546907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment by cytogenetic analysis of the radioprotection properties of propolis extract.
Montoro A; Almonacid M; Serrano J; Saiz M; Barquinero JF; Barrios L; Verdú G; Pérez J; Villaescusa JI
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):461-4. PubMed ID: 16381767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of the dicentric assay for biological dosimetry for radiation accidents in Bulgaria.
Hadjidekova V; Hristova R; Ainsbury EA; Atanasova P; Popova L; Staynova A
Health Phys; 2010 Feb; 98(2):252-7. PubMed ID: 20065690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Health impacts of large releases of radionuclides. Cytogenetic effects as quantitative indicators of radiation exposure.
Bauchinger M
Ciba Found Symp; 1997; 203():188-99; discussion 199-204, 232-4. PubMed ID: 9339319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biological estimates of dose to inhabitants of Belarus and Ukraine following the Chernobyl accident.
Edwards A; Voisin P; Sorokine-Durm I; Maznik N; Vinnikov V; Mikhalevich L; Moquet J; Lloyd D; Delbos M; Durand V
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 15266074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of americium-241 alpha-particles on the dose-response of chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes analysed by fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Barquinero JF; Stephan G; Schmid E
Int J Radiat Biol; 2004 Feb; 80(2):155-64. PubMed ID: 15164797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Why can't we find a better biological indicator of dose?
Voisin P; Roy L; Benderitter M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 112(4):465-9. PubMed ID: 15623880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The cytogenetic dosimetry of recent accidental overexposure.
Voisin P; Benderitter M; Claraz M; Chambrette V; Sorokine-Durm I; Delbos M; Durand V; Leroy A; Paillole N
Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand); 2001 May; 47(3):557-64. PubMed ID: 11441964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The yield of radiation-induced chromosomal aberrations in first division human lymphocytes depends on the culture time.
Hone PA; Edwards AA; Lloyd DC; Moquet JE
Int J Radiat Biol; 2005 Jul; 81(7):523-9. PubMed ID: 16263656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Unstable chromosome aberrations in lymphocytes of liquidators of the Chernobyl accident consequences].
Svirnovskiĭ AI; Ivanov EP; Danilov IP; Bakun AV; Ageĭchik VM; Ivanov VE
Ter Arkh; 1998; 70(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 9532656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
