BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16381783)

  • 21. Finger doses for staff handling radiopharmaceuticals in nuclear medicine.
    Pant GS; Sharma SK; Rath GK
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2006 Sep; 34(3):169-73. PubMed ID: 16951286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Monte Carlo calculations and validation of a gold foil-based Bonner sphere system.
    Fernández F; Bouassoule T; Amgarou K; Domingo C; Garcia MJ; Lacoste V; Gressier V; Muller H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 126(1-4):366-70. PubMed ID: 17513852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Monte Carlo based voxel phantoms for in vivo internal dosimetry.
    Ros JM; Moraleda M; López MA; Navarro T; Navarro JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):161-5. PubMed ID: 17449911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Induced radioactivity in the ESRF storage ring.
    Berkvens P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):475-80. PubMed ID: 16381770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. External dosimetry and personnel monitoring.
    Poston JW
    Health Phys; 2005 Apr; 88(4):289-96. PubMed ID: 15761291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hand exposure to ionising radiation of nuclear medicine workers.
    Wrzesień M; Olszewski J; Jankowski J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(3):325-30. PubMed ID: 18310609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Monte Carlo study of a 60Co calibration field of the Dosimetry Laboratory Seibersdorf.
    Hranitzky C; Stadtmann H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):153-6. PubMed ID: 17337744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. On the reassessment of thermal neutron doses in TLD-100 by measuring the residual dose.
    Abraham A; Weinstein M; German U; Alfassi ZB
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 126(1-4):524-7. PubMed ID: 17507383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. MCNPX vs. DORT for SNS shielding design studies.
    Popova II
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):559-63. PubMed ID: 16381785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Intercomparison of active personal dosemeters in interventional radiology.
    Clairand I; Struelens L; Bordy JM; Daures J; Debroas J; Denozières M; Donadille L; Gouriou J; Itié C; Vaz P; d'Errico F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):340-5. PubMed ID: 18503062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimating historical radiation doses to a cohort of U.S. radiologic technologists.
    Simon SL; Weinstock RM; Doody MM; Neton J; Wenzl T; Stewart P; Mohan AK; Yoder RC; Hauptmann M; Freedman DM; Cardarelli J; Feng HA; Bouville A; Linet M
    Radiat Res; 2006 Jul; 166(1 Pt 2):174-92. PubMed ID: 16808606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Development of a new electronic personal neutron dosemeter using a CMOS active pixel sensor.
    Trocmé M; Higueret S; Husson D; Nourreddine A; Lê TD
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 126(1-4):536-40. PubMed ID: 17576655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Neutron spectrometry around a high-energy electron-positron collider using a multi-sphere system with passive detectors.
    Bedogni R; Esposito A; Chiti M; Angelone M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 126(1-4):541-5. PubMed ID: 17502313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Effective radiation doses of the personnel at rentgenosurgical studies].
    Lebedev LA; Blinov AB; Lobov DP; Mikheenko SG
    Med Tekh; 2005; (3):11-4. PubMed ID: 16106952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Radiation dose to PET technologists and strategies to lower occupational exposure.
    Roberts FO; Gunawardana DH; Pathmaraj K; Wallace A; U PL; Mi T; Berlangieri SU; O'Keefe GJ; Rowe CC; Scott AM
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2005 Mar; 33(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 15731021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Three-dimensional shielding calculations for the IFMIF neutron source using a coupled Monte Carlo/Deterministic computational scheme.
    Chen Y; Fischer U; Simakov SP; Wasastjerna F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):573-9. PubMed ID: 16381788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. UNCERTAINTY EVALUATION FOR MULTIDETECTOR PASSIVE DOSEMETERS USING A TWO-STAGE MEASUREMENT MODEL AND THE MONTE CARLO METHOD.
    van Dijk JW
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):74-7. PubMed ID: 26656080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Using operational equipment to read accident dosemeters.
    Devine RT; Vigil MM; Martinez WA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):699-700. PubMed ID: 15353733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Application of workplace correction factors to dosemeter results for the assessment of personal doses at nuclear facilities.
    Lindborg L; Bolognese-Milsztajn T; Boschung M; Coeck M; Curzio G; d'Errico F; Fiechtner A; Hallfarth D; Lievens B; Lillhök JE; Lövefors-Daun A; Lacoste V; Luszik-Bhadra M; Reginatto M; Schuhmacher H; Tanner R; Vanhavere F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 124(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 17893081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Operational comparison of TLD albedo dosemeters and solid state nuclear tracks detectors in fuel fabrication facilities.
    Tsujimura N; Takada C; Yoshida T; Momose T
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):383-6. PubMed ID: 17337735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.