These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16382081)

  • 1. Playing dice with criminal sentences: the influence of irrelevant anchors on experts' judicial decision making.
    Englich B; Mussweiler T; Strack F
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Feb; 32(2):188-200. PubMed ID: 16382081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptions of domestic violence and mock jurors' sentencing decisions.
    Kern R; Libkuman TM; Temple SL
    J Interpers Violence; 2007 Dec; 22(12):1515-35. PubMed ID: 17993639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adjusting risk of recidivism: do judicial departures worsen or improve recidivism prediction under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines?
    Krauss DA
    Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(6):731-50. PubMed ID: 15386558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The last word in court--a hidden disadvantage for the defense.
    Englich B; Mussweiler T; Strack F
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Dec; 29(6):705-22. PubMed ID: 16382357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting sentencing for low-level crimes: comparing models of human judgment.
    von Helversen B; Rieskamp J
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Dec; 15(4):375-95. PubMed ID: 20025422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relation of affect control theory to the sentencing of criminals.
    Tsoudis O
    J Soc Psychol; 2000 Aug; 140(4):473-85. PubMed ID: 10981376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of rational and experiential information processing of expert testimony in death penalty cases.
    Krauss DA; Lieberman JD; Olson J
    Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(6):801-22. PubMed ID: 15568199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Expert witness confidence and juror personality: their impact on credibility and persuasion in the courtroom.
    Cramer RJ; Brodsky SL; DeCoster J
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 19297636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of religion in death penalty sentencing trials.
    Miller MK; Bornstein BH
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Dec; 30(6):675-84. PubMed ID: 17051441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Criminal responsibility in schizophrenia with special attention to the mental state during the criminal act--a study based upon the activation-recurrence phenomenon].
    Higashi T
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2009; 111(7):762-88. PubMed ID: 19827562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating science outside the trial box: applying Daubert to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines' criminal history score.
    Krauss DA
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2006; 29(4):289-305. PubMed ID: 16530267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of information about sentencing decisions on public attitudes toward the criminal justice system.
    St Amand MD; Zamble E
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Oct; 25(5):515-28. PubMed ID: 11688371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When mitigation evidence makes a difference: effects of psychological mitigating evidence on sentencing decisions in capital trials.
    Barnett ME; Brodsky SL; Davis CM
    Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(6):751-70. PubMed ID: 15386561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk and resources: A qualitative perspective on low-level sentencing in Virginia.
    Metz A; Monahan J; Garrett B; Siebert L
    J Community Psychol; 2019 Jul; 47(6):1476-1492. PubMed ID: 31090080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cooperative guardian offenders and sentencing outcomes: Evidence from criminal sentencing documents of child trafficking crime in China.
    Xin Y; Cai T
    Child Abuse Negl; 2022 Feb; 124():105449. PubMed ID: 34922261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Expert testimony in capital sentencing: juror responses.
    Montgomery JH; Ciccone JR; Garvey SP; Eisenberg T
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(4):509-18. PubMed ID: 16394228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pathological gambling: forensic issues.
    Blaszczynski A; Silove D
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1996 Jun; 30(3):358-69. PubMed ID: 8839948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence on judges' sentencing practices of a mental evaluation.
    Cooke G; Pogany E
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1975; 3(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 1234521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The testimony of forensic identification science: what expert witnesses say and what factfinders hear.
    McQuiston-Surrett D; Saks MJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Oct; 33(5):436-53. PubMed ID: 19259800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Credibility in the courtroom: how likeable should an expert witness be?
    Brodsky SL; Neal TM; Cramer RJ; Ziemke MH
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(4):525-32. PubMed ID: 20019000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.