108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1638252)
1. Mild and moderate dyskaryosis: can women be selected for colposcopy on the basis of social criteria?
Anderson DJ; Flannelly GM; Kitchener HC; Fisher PM; Mann EM; Campbell MK; Templeton A
BMJ; 1992 Jul; 305(6845):84-7. PubMed ID: 1638252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Management of women with mild and moderate cervical dyskaryosis.
Flannelly G; Anderson D; Kitchener HC; Mann EM; Campbell M; Fisher P; Walker F; Templeton AA
BMJ; 1994 May; 308(6941):1399-403. PubMed ID: 8019248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biopsy and selective recall compared with immediate large loop excision in management of women with low grade abnormal cervical cytology referred for colposcopy: multicentre randomised controlled trial.
TOMBOLA Group
BMJ; 2009 Jul; 339():b2548. PubMed ID: 19638647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Four and a half year follow up of women with dyskaryotic cervical smears.
Fletcher A; Metaxas N; Grubb C; Chamberlain J
BMJ; 1990 Sep; 301(6753):641-4. PubMed ID: 2224218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Determinants of high-grade dysplasia among women with mild dyskaryosis on cervical smear.
Parazzini F; Sideri M; Restelli S; Schettino F; Chatenoud L; Crosignani PG
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Nov; 86(5):754-7. PubMed ID: 7566843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cytological status and lesion size: a further dimension in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Jarmulowicz MR; Jenkins D; Barton SE; Goodall AL; Hollingworth A; Singer A
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 Sep; 96(9):1061-6. PubMed ID: 2804008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cigarette smoking and histological outcome in women with mildly dyskaryotic cervical smears.
Luesley D; Blomfield P; Dunn J; Shafi M; Chenoy R; Buxton J
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1994 Jan; 101(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 8297868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does mild atypia on a cervical smear warrant further investigation?
Walker EM; Dodgson J; Duncan ID
Lancet; 1986 Sep; 2(8508):672-3. PubMed ID: 2876144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cytological surveillance compared with immediate referral for colposcopy in management of women with low grade cervical abnormalities: multicentre randomised controlled trial.
TOMBOLA Group
BMJ; 2009 Jul; 339():b2546. PubMed ID: 19638646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Colposcopy in a family planning clinic: a future model?
Kitchener HC; Burnett RA; Wilson ES; Cordiner JW
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1987 May; 294(6583):1313-5. PubMed ID: 3109632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Regular audit of colposcopic biopsies from women with a mildly dyskaryotic or borderline cervical smear results in fewer cases of CINIII.
Jones MH; Jenkins D; Singer A
Cytopathology; 1996 Feb; 7(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 8833870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Management of women with abnormal cervical cytology: treatment patterns and associated costs in England and Wales.
Martin-Hirsch P; Rash B; Martin A; Standaert B
BJOG; 2007 Apr; 114(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 17378815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How significant is a cervical smear showing glandular dyskaryosis?
Pisal NV; Sindos M; Desai S; Mansell E; Singer A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2003 Jun; 108(2):209-12. PubMed ID: 12781413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The cytological detection of persistent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after local ablative treatment: a comparison of sampling devices.
Hughes RG; Haddad NG; Smart GE; Colquhoun M; McGoogan E; MacIntyre CC; Prescott RJ
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Jun; 99(6):498-502. PubMed ID: 1637767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conservative treatment of mild/moderate cervical dyskaryosis: long-term outcome.
Kirby AJ; Spiegelhalter DJ; Day NE; Fenton L; Swanson K; Mann EM; Macgregor JE
Lancet; 1992 Apr; 339(8797):828-31. PubMed ID: 1347856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Management guidelines for women with normal colposcopy after low grade cervical abnormalities: population study.
Teale GR; Moffitt DD; Mann CH; Luesley DM
BMJ; 2000 Jun; 320(7251):1693-6. PubMed ID: 10864542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Repeating cytology at initial colposcopy does not improve detection of high-grade abnormalities: a retrospective cohort study of 6595 women.
Rieck GC; Bhaumik J; Beer HR; Leeson SC
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 May; 101(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 16325241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mild cervical dyskaryosis: safety of cytological surveillance.
Jones MH; Jenkins D; Cuzick J; Wolfendale MR; Jones JJ; Balogun-Lynch C; Usherwood MM; Singer A
Lancet; 1992 Jun; 339(8807):1440-3. PubMed ID: 1351129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A retrospective study of cervical screening in women under 25 years (2005-2009).
Ali AA; Richardson D; Hill N
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Apr; 287(4):765-9. PubMed ID: 23183714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can the number of cigarettes smoked predict high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia among women with mildly abnormal cervical smears?
Daly SF; Doyle M; English J; Turner M; Clinch J; Prendiville W
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Aug; 179(2):399-402. PubMed ID: 9731845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
