BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16382590)

  • 1. Effect of LED curing modes on cusp deflection and hardness of composite restorations.
    Alomari QD; Mansour YF
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(6):684-9. PubMed ID: 16382590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of liners on cusp deflection and gap formation in composite restorations.
    Alomari QD; Reinhardt JW; Boyer DB
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):406-11. PubMed ID: 11504442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of interfacial bond quality on the direction of polymerization shrinkage flow in resin composite restorations.
    Cho BH; Dickens SH; Bae JH; Chang CG; Son HH; Um CM
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 12022463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations.
    Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Dec; 31(124):27-34. PubMed ID: 19441264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in vitro study of microleakage of occlusal composite restorations polymerized by a conventional curing light and a PAC curing light.
    Stritikus J; Owens B
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 11314147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of layering techniques on the micro-tensile bond strength to dentin in resin composite restorations.
    Niu Y; Ma X; Fan M; Zhu S
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):129-34. PubMed ID: 18614225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of stepped light exposure on the volumetric polymerization shrinkage and bulk modulus of dental composites and an unfilled resin.
    Price RB; Rizkalla AS; Hall GC
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):176-80. PubMed ID: 11763926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigation of polymerisation shrinkage strain, associated cuspal movement and microleakage of MOD cavities restored incrementally with resin-based composite using an LED light curing unit.
    Fleming GJ; Khan S; Afzal O; Palin WM; Burke FJ
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 16842899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of instrument compliance and specimen thickness on the polymerization shrinkage stress measurement of light-cured composites.
    Lee SH; Chang J; Ferracane J; Lee IB
    Dent Mater; 2007 Sep; 23(9):1093-100. PubMed ID: 17112580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of the soft-start (pulse-delay) polymerization technique in Class I and II composite restorations.
    Chan DC; Browning WD; Frazier KB; Brackett MG
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 18505216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hardness and wear resistance of two resin composites cured with equivalent radiant exposure from a low irradiance LED and QTH light-curing units.
    Ramp LC; Broome JC; Ramp MH
    Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 16555655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effectiveness of different polymerization protocols for class II composite resin restorations.
    de Jong LC; Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JJ; Wolke JG; Geitenbeek B
    J Dent; 2007 Jun; 35(6):513-20. PubMed ID: 17383067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of a LED versus halogen light cure polymerization on the curing characteristics of three composite resins.
    Besnault C; Pradelle-Plasse N; Picard B; Colon P
    Am J Dent; 2003 Oct; 16(5):323-8. PubMed ID: 14677611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of prepolymerized composite megafiller on the marginal adaptation of composite restorations in cavities with different C-factors: an SEM study.
    Bhushan S; Logani A; Shah N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2010; 21(4):500-5. PubMed ID: 21187613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Curing units' ability to cure restorative composites and dual-cured composite cements under composite overlay.
    Park SH; Kim SS; Cho YS; Lee CK; Noh BD
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):627-35. PubMed ID: 15646217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Composite resin microhardness: the influence of light curing method, composite shade, and depth of cure.
    de Araújo CS; Schein MT; Zanchi CH; Rodrigues SA; Demarco FF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 May; 9(4):43-50. PubMed ID: 18473026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatially resolved assessments of composite shrinkage in MOD restorations using a digital-image-correlation technique.
    Chuang SF; Chang CH; Chen TY
    Dent Mater; 2011 Feb; 27(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 20951420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of premolar cuspal deflection in bulk or in incremental composite restoration methods.
    Kim ME; Park SH
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):326-34. PubMed ID: 21827222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Direct dentin bonding technique sensitivity when using air/suction drying steps.
    Magne P; Mahallati R; Bazos P; So WS
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(2):130-8; discussion 139-40. PubMed ID: 18380845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cure width potential for MOD resin composite molar restorations.
    Palin WM; Senyilmaz DP; Marquis PM; Shortall AC
    Dent Mater; 2008 Aug; 24(8):1083-94. PubMed ID: 18304625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.