BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16382829)

  • 1. Empirical analysis of the STR profiles resulting from conceptual mixtures.
    Paoletti DR; Doom TE; Krane CM; Raymer ML; Krane DE
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Nov; 50(6):1361-6. PubMed ID: 16382829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Least-square deconvolution: a framework for interpreting short tandem repeat mixtures.
    Wang T; Xue N; Birdwell JD
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Nov; 51(6):1284-97. PubMed ID: 17199614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Towards understanding the effect of uncertainty in the number of contributors to DNA stains.
    Buckleton JS; Curran JM; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Mar; 1(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 19083724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Systematic analysis of stutter percentages and allele peak height and peak area ratios at heterozygous STR loci for forensic casework and database samples.
    Leclair B; Frégeau CJ; Bowen KL; Fourney RM
    J Forensic Sci; 2004 Sep; 49(5):968-80. PubMed ID: 15461097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Increasing the confidence in half-sibship determination based upon 15 STR loci.
    Pu CE; Linacre A
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2008 Aug; 15(6):373-7. PubMed ID: 18586207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interpreting Y chromosome STR haplotype mixture.
    Ge J; Budowle B; Chakraborty R
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2010 May; 12(3):137-43. PubMed ID: 20346725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identification and characterization of variant alleles at CODIS STR loci.
    Allor C; Einum DD; Scarpetta M
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Sep; 50(5):1128-33. PubMed ID: 16225220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Systematic evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of sibship determination by using 15 STR loci.
    Pu CE; Linacre A
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2008 Jul; 15(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 18511010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Natural DNA mixtures generated in fraternal twins in utero.
    Rubocki RJ; McCue BJ; Duffy KJ; Shepard KL; Shepherd SJ; Wisecarver JL
    J Forensic Sci; 2001 Jan; 46(1):120-5. PubMed ID: 11210896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Short tandem repeat (STR) genotyping of keratinised hair. Part 2. An optimised genomic DNA extraction procedure reveals donor dependence of STR profiles.
    McNevin D; Wilson-Wilde L; Robertson J; Kyd J; Lennard C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Oct; 153(2-3):247-59. PubMed ID: 15998572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The application of an automated allele concordance analysis system (CompareCalls) to ensure the accuracy of single-source STR DNA profiles.
    Ryan JH; Barrus JK; Budowle B; Shannon CM; Thompson VW; Ward BE
    J Forensic Sci; 2004 May; 49(3):492-9. PubMed ID: 15171165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. PENDULUM--a guideline-based approach to the interpretation of STR mixtures.
    Bill M; Gill P; Curran J; Clayton T; Pinchin R; Healy M; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Mar; 148(2-3):181-9. PubMed ID: 15639613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mixture interpretation: Experimental and simulated reevaluation of qualitative analysis.
    Manabe S; Mori Y; Kawai C; Ozeki M; Tamaki K
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2013 Mar; 15(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 23089142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating the number of contributors to forensic DNA mixtures: does maximum likelihood perform better than maximum allele count?
    Haned H; Pène L; Lobry JR; Dufour AB; Pontier D
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 20840286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Matching and partially-matching DNA profiles.
    Weir BS
    J Forensic Sci; 2004 Sep; 49(5):1009-14. PubMed ID: 15461102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Expanding beyond the current core STR loci: An exploration of 73 STR markers with increased diversity for enhanced DNA mixture deconvolution.
    Novroski NMM; Wendt FR; Woerner AE; Bus MM; Coble M; Budowle B
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jan; 38():121-129. PubMed ID: 30396008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of a DNA mixture statistics tool incorporating allelic drop-out and drop-in.
    Mitchell AA; Tamariz J; O'Connell K; Ducasse N; Budimlija Z; Prinz M; Caragine T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):749-61. PubMed ID: 22999739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Characterization of 26 miniSTR loci for improved analysis of degraded DNA samples.
    Hill CR; Kline MC; Coble MD; Butler JM
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jan; 53(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 18005005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unknown biological mixtures evaluation using STR analytical quantification.
    Shrestha S; Strathdee SA; Broman KW; Smith MW
    Electrophoresis; 2006 Feb; 27(2):409-15. PubMed ID: 16437418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Allele frequencies and haplotypes of 12 Y-STR loci for the local Chinese population in Hong Kong.
    Yeung SM; Wong LM; Cheung BK; To KY
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Oct; 162(1-3):55-63. PubMed ID: 16876356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.