These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16383055)

  • 1. The clinical performance of CAD/CAM-generated composite inlays.
    Fasbinder DJ; Dennison JB; Heys DR; Lampe K
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Dec; 136(12):1714-23. PubMed ID: 16383055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A 5-year clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with a dual-cured or chemically cured resin composite luting agent.
    Sjögren G; Molin M; van Dijken JW
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1998 Oct; 56(5):263-7. PubMed ID: 9860093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Proximal direct composite restorations and chairside CAD/CAM inlays: marginal adaptation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel conditioning.
    Bortolotto T; Onisor I; Krejci I
    Clin Oral Investig; 2007 Mar; 11(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 17031673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal adaptation, fracture load and macroscopic failure mode of adhesively luted PMMA-based CAD/CAM inlays.
    Ender A; Bienz S; Mörmann W; Mehl A; Attin T; Stawarczyk B
    Dent Mater; 2016 Feb; 32(2):e22-9. PubMed ID: 26723841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A 10-year prospective evaluation of CAD/CAM-manufactured (Cerec) ceramic inlays cemented with a chemically cured or dual-cured resin composite.
    Sjögren G; Molin M; van Dijken JW
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 15119879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns.
    Attia A; Abdelaziz KM; Freitag S; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16473085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-aided direct ceramic restorations: a 10-year prospective clinical study of Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays.
    Otto T; De Nisco S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 11951800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of the Crystallization Firing Process on Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Silicate-based Glass-ceramic Inlays Fabricated With a CAD/CAM Chairside System.
    Kobayashi M; Niizuma Y; Sugai R; Manabe A
    Oper Dent; 2023 Nov; 48(6):657-665. PubMed ID: 37882476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
    Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term clinical results of chairside Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays: a case series.
    Otto T; Schneider D
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 18350948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Restoration with a posterior CAD/CAM onlay after failure of a direct resin-based composite restoration: a case report.
    Arossi GA; Patel R; Eisner A; Melo MAS
    Gen Dent; 2024; 72(5):54-59. PubMed ID: 39151083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Luting of inlays, onlays, and overlays with preheated restorative composite resin does not prevent seating accuracy.
    Magne P; Razaghy M; Carvalho MA; Soares LM
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2018; 13(3):318-332. PubMed ID: 30073216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of fit accuracy of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated from wax or resin patterns with conventional and CAD-CAM technologies.
    Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Oct; 120(4):530-536. PubMed ID: 30318049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays compared to composite restorations.
    Lange RT; Pfeiffer P
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):263-72. PubMed ID: 19544814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of ceramic color and translucency on shade match of CAD/CAM porcelain veneers.
    Salameh Z; Tehini G; Ziadeh N; Ragab HA; Berberi A; Aboushelib MN
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 24757701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-year evaluation of computer-machined ceramic inlays: influence of luting agent.
    Zuellig-Singer R; Bryant RW
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Sep; 29(9):573-82. PubMed ID: 9807141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The clinical performance of CAD-CAM-generated ceramic inlays: a four-year study.
    Heymann HO; Bayne SC; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD; Roberson TM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Aug; 127(8):1171-81. PubMed ID: 8803392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of proximal box elevation on the marginal quality and fracture behavior of root-filled molars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic or composite onlays.
    Ilgenstein I; Zitzmann NU; Bühler J; Wegehaupt FJ; Attin T; Weiger R; Krastl G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Jun; 19(5):1021-8. PubMed ID: 25248949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical performance of pressed ceramic inlays luted with resin-modified glass ionomer and autopolymerizing resin composite cements.
    van Dijken JW; Ormin A; Olofsson AL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Nov; 82(5):529-35. PubMed ID: 10559724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-year clinical evaluation of CAD/CAM restorations.
    Isenberg BP; Essig ME; Leinfelder KF
    J Esthet Dent; 1992; 4(5):173-6. PubMed ID: 1288604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.