These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16383167)
1. Eyewitness decisions in simultaneous and sequential lineups: a dual-process signal detection theory analysis. Meissner CA; Tredoux CG; Parker JF; MacLin OH Mem Cognit; 2005 Jul; 33(5):783-92. PubMed ID: 16383167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sequential lineup presentation promotes less-biased criterion setting but does not improve discriminability. Palmer MA; Brewer N Law Hum Behav; 2012 Jun; 36(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 22667814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Eyewitness confidence in simultaneous and sequential lineups: a criterion shift account for sequential mistaken identification overconfidence. Dobolyi DG; Dodson CS J Exp Psychol Appl; 2013 Dec; 19(4):345-57. PubMed ID: 24188335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. New signal detection theory-based framework for eyewitness performance in lineups. Lee J; Penrod SD Law Hum Behav; 2019 Oct; 43(5):436-454. PubMed ID: 31368723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Eyewitness identification in simultaneous and sequential lineups: an investigation of position effects using receiver operating characteristics. Meisters J; Diedenhofen B; Musch J Memory; 2018 Oct; 26(9):1297-1309. PubMed ID: 29676666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Double-blind photo lineups using actual eyewitnesses: an experimental test of a sequential versus simultaneous lineup procedure. Wells GL; Steblay NK; Dysart JE Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 24933175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The target-to-foils shift in simultaneous and sequential lineups. Clark SE; Davey SL Law Hum Behav; 2005 Apr; 29(2):151-72. PubMed ID: 15912721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robustness of the sequential lineup advantage. Gronlund SD; Carlson CA; Dailey SB; Goodsell CA J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Jun; 15(2):140-152. PubMed ID: 19586253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating the reliability of eyewitness identifications from police lineups. Wixted JT; Mickes L; Dunn JC; Clark SE; Wells W Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Jan; 113(2):304-9. PubMed ID: 26699467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do sequential lineups impair underlying discriminability? Kaesler M; Dunn JC; Ransom K; Semmler C Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Aug; 5(1):35. PubMed ID: 32754862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Why are lineups better than showups? A test of the filler siphoning and enhanced discriminability accounts. Colloff MF; Wixted JT J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Mar; 26(1):124-143. PubMed ID: 30883151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimating the proportion of guilty suspects and posterior probability of guilt in lineups using signal-detection models. Cohen AL; Starns JJ; Rotello CM; Cataldo AM Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 May; 5(1):21. PubMed ID: 32405927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. PC_Eyewitness and the sequential superiority effect: computer-based lineup administration. MacLin OH; Zimmerman LA; Malpass RS Law Hum Behav; 2005 Jun; 29(3):303-21. PubMed ID: 15965630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lineup composition, suspect position, and the sequential lineup advantage. Carlson CA; Gronlund SD; Clark SE J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Jun; 14(2):118-128. PubMed ID: 18590368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of fillers on lineup performance. Wetmore SA; McAdoo RM; Gronlund SD; Neuschatz JS Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2017; 2(1):48. PubMed ID: 29214209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Backloading in the sequential lineup prevents within-lineup criterion shifts that undermine eyewitness identification performance. Horry R; Palmer MA; Brewer N J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):346-60. PubMed ID: 22924858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]