These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16385154)

  • 1. Issues in multi-item scale testing and development using structural equation models.
    McQuitty S; Bishop JW
    J Appl Meas; 2006; 7(1):117-28. PubMed ID: 16385154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality of life in infants and children with atopic dermatitis: addressing issues of differential item functioning across countries in multinational clinical trials.
    McKenna SP; Doward LC; Meads DM; Tennant A; Lawton G; Grueger J
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2007 Jul; 5():45. PubMed ID: 17662129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Substantive scale construction.
    Stone MH
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(3):282-97. PubMed ID: 12904678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of a comprehensiveness of Rasch measurement application scale.
    Lamprianou I
    J Appl Meas; 2006; 7(1):92-116. PubMed ID: 16385153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A taxonomy of effect size measures for the differential functioning of items and scales.
    Meade AW
    J Appl Psychol; 2010 Jul; 95(4):728-43. PubMed ID: 20604592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The construction and implementation of user-defined fit tests for use with marginal maximum likelihood estimation and generalized item response models.
    Adams RJ; Wu ML
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(4):355-70. PubMed ID: 19934525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of varying the number of response alternatives in rating scales: experimental evidence from intra-individual effects.
    Maydeu-Olivares A; Kramp U; García-Forero C; Gallardo-Pujol D; Coffman D
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 May; 41(2):295-308. PubMed ID: 19363170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Potential problems with "well fitting" models.
    Tomarken AJ; Waller NG
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2003 Nov; 112(4):578-98. PubMed ID: 14674870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Item set discrimination and the unit in the Rasch model.
    Humphry S
    J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(2):165-80. PubMed ID: 22805360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling.
    Cole DA; Maxwell SE
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2003 Nov; 112(4):558-77. PubMed ID: 14674869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fisher's information function and Rasch measurement.
    Stone MH
    J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(2):125-35. PubMed ID: 18480509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A combined-method psychometric analysis recommended modification of the multidimensional health locus of control scales.
    Kelly PA; Kallen MA; Suárez-Almazor ME
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 May; 60(5):440-7. PubMed ID: 17419954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Impact of Vision Impairment Questionnaire: an evaluation of its measurement properties using Rasch analysis.
    Lamoureux EL; Pallant JF; Pesudovs K; Hassell JB; Keeffe JE
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Nov; 47(11):4732-41. PubMed ID: 17065481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using the Rasch model in nursing research: an introduction and illustrative example.
    Hagquist C; Bruce M; Gustavsson JP
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Mar; 46(3):380-93. PubMed ID: 19059593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Power equivalence in structural equation modelling.
    von Oertzen T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 May; 63(Pt 2):257-72. PubMed ID: 19527562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. From model to measurement with dichotomous items.
    Burdick D; Stenner AJ; Kyngdon A
    J Appl Meas; 2010; 11(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 20693697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Type I errors and power of the parametric bootstrap goodness-of-fit test: full and limited information.
    Tollenaar N; Mooijaart A
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):271-88. PubMed ID: 14633336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving measurement in health education and health behavior research using item response modeling: introducing item response modeling.
    Wilson M; Allen DD; Li JC
    Health Educ Res; 2006 Dec; 21 Suppl 1():i4-18. PubMed ID: 17018765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Item response theory analyses of physical functioning items in the medical outcomes study.
    Hays RD; Liu H; Spritzer K; Cella D
    Med Care; 2007 May; 45(5 Suppl 1):S32-8. PubMed ID: 17443117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Non-linear structural equation models with correlated continuous and discrete data.
    Lee SY; Song XY; Cai JH; So WY; Ma CW; Chan CN
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):327-47. PubMed ID: 18590605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.