178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16385657)
1. Comparison of the predictive value of myelography, computed tomography and MRI on the treadmill test in lumbar spinal stenosis.
Moon ES; Kim HS; Park JO; Shin DE; Ha JW; Shim DJ; Kwak YH; Lee KI
Yonsei Med J; 2005 Dec; 46(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 16385657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Axial loading during magnetic resonance imaging in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis: does it reproduce the positional change of the dural sac detected by upright myelography?
Kanno H; Endo T; Ozawa H; Koizumi Y; Morozumi N; Itoi E; Ishii Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul; 37(16):E985-92. PubMed ID: 21258271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Myelography using flat panel volumetric computed tomography: a comparative study in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
Engelhorn T; Rennert J; Richter G; Struffert T; Ganslandt O; Doerfler A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(18):E523-7. PubMed ID: 17700433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improved magnetic resonance myelography of the lumbar spine using image fusion and volumetry.
Eberhardt K; Ganslandt O; Stadlbauer A
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb; 20(2):220-6. PubMed ID: 24328762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Evaluation of lumbar canal stenosis: decubitus imaging methods versus flexion-extension myelography and surface measurements versus the diameter of the dural sac].
Coulier B
JBR-BTR; 2000 Apr; 83(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 10859898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography-myelography for quantitative evaluation of lumbar intracanalar cross-section.
Ogura H; Miyamoto K; Fukuta S; Naganawa T; Shimizu K
Yonsei Med J; 2011 Jan; 52(1):137-44. PubMed ID: 21155046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic changes in the dural sac of patients with lumbar canal stenosis evaluated by multidetector-row computed tomography after myelography.
Kanbara S; Yukawa Y; Ito K; Machino M; Kato F
Eur Spine J; 2014 Jan; 23(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 23817960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnosis of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Functional Myelography.
Morgalla M; Frantz S; Dezena RA; Pereira CU; Tatagiba M
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2018 Jul; 79(4):316-322. PubMed ID: 29346832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Congenital lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective, control-matched, cohort radiographic analysis.
Singh K; Samartzis D; Vaccaro AR; Nassr A; Andersson GB; Yoon ST; Phillips FM; Goldberg EJ; An HS
Spine J; 2005; 5(6):615-22. PubMed ID: 16291100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The diagnostic value of a treadmill test in predicting lumbar spinal stenosis.
Barz T; Melloh M; Staub L; Roeder C; Lange J; Smiszek FG; Theis JC; Merk HR
Eur Spine J; 2008 May; 17(5):686-90. PubMed ID: 18259784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of computed tomography-myelography, magnetic resonance imaging, and myelography in the diagnosis of herniated nucleus pulposus and spinal stenosis.
Bischoff RJ; Rodriguez RP; Gupta K; Righi A; Dalton JE; Whitecloud TS
J Spinal Disord; 1993 Aug; 6(4):289-95. PubMed ID: 8219542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomogram-myelography for evaluation of cross sections of cervical spinal morphology.
Naganawa T; Miyamoto K; Ogura H; Suzuki N; Shimizu K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jan; 36(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 20581762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Postacchini F; Amatruda A; Morace GB; Perugia D
Ital J Orthop Traumatol; 1991 Sep; 17(3):327-37. PubMed ID: 1783545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. When does CT myelography add value beyond MRI for lumbar degenerative disease?
Weisenthal BW; Glassman SD; Mkorombindo T; Nelson L; Carreon LY
Spine J; 2022 May; 22(5):787-792. PubMed ID: 34848342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lumbar spine: quantitative and qualitative assessment of positional (upright flexion and extension) MR imaging and myelography.
Wildermuth S; Zanetti M; Duewell S; Schmid MR; Romanowski B; Benini A; Böni T; Hodler J
Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):391-8. PubMed ID: 9577486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Changes in dural sac caliber with standing MRI improve correlation with symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis.
Lau YYO; Lee RKL; Griffith JF; Chan CLY; Law SW; Kwok KO
Eur Spine J; 2017 Oct; 26(10):2666-2675. PubMed ID: 28702785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis in adults: a metaanalysis of the accuracy of CT, MR, and myelography.
Kent DL; Haynor DR; Larson EB; Deyo RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 May; 158(5):1135-44. PubMed ID: 1533084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The value of dynamic radiographic myelography in addition to magnetic resonance imaging in detection lumbar spinal canal stenosis: A prospective study.
Merkle M; Maier G; Danz S; Kaminsky J; Tatagiba MS; Hebela NM; Roser F
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2016 Apr; 143():4-8. PubMed ID: 26874937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can recumbent magnetic resonance imaging replace myelography or computed tomography myelography for detecting lumbar spinal stenosis?
Sasaki K; Hasegawa K; Shimoda H; Keiji I; Homma T
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2013 Jul; 23 Suppl 1():S77-83. PubMed ID: 23542928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of computed tomography and myelography in the diagnosis of central spinal stenosis.
Bolender NF; Schönström NS; Spengler DM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1985 Feb; 67(2):240-6. PubMed ID: 3968115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
