BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1638587)

  • 1. Cefprozil versus cefaclor in the treatment of mild to moderate skin and skin-structure infections. The Cefprozil Multicenter Study Group.
    Parish LC; Doyle CA; Durham SJ; Wilber RB
    Clin Ther; 1992; 14(3):458-69. PubMed ID: 1638587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cefprozil versus cefaclor in the treatment of acute and uncomplicated urinary tract infections. Cefprozil Multicenter Study Group.
    Iravani A; Doyle CA; Durham SJ; Wilber RB
    Clin Ther; 1992; 14(2):314-26. PubMed ID: 1611652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy of cefaclor AF in the treatment of skin and skin-structure infections.
    Schupbach CW; Olovich KG; Dere WH
    Clin Ther; 1992; 14(3):470-9. PubMed ID: 1638588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cefprozil. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential.
    Wiseman LR; Benfield P
    Drugs; 1993 Feb; 45(2):295-317. PubMed ID: 7681376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical trials of cefprozil for treatment of skin and skin-structure infections: review.
    Nolen TM
    Clin Infect Dis; 1992 Jun; 14 Suppl 2():S255-63; discussion S272. PubMed ID: 1617046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative study of cefprozil and cefaclor in children with bacterial infections of skin and skin structures.
    Faingezicht I; BolaƱos HJ; Arias G; Guevara J; Ruiz M
    Pediatr Infect Dis J; 1992 Nov; 11(11):976-8. PubMed ID: 1454446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Loracarbef (LY163892) versus cefaclor in the treatment of bacterial skin and skin-structure infections in an adult population.
    McCarty J; Ruoff GE; Jacobson KD
    Am J Med; 1992 Jun; 92(6A):80S-85S. PubMed ID: 1621751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative efficacy and safety of cefprozil versus penicillin, cefaclor and erythromycin in the treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis and tonsillitis.
    McCarty JM
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1994 Oct; 13(10):846-50. PubMed ID: 7889958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative study of the efficacy, safety and tolerability of azithromycin and cefaclor in the treatment of children with acute skin and/or soft tissue infections.
    Montero L
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1996 Jun; 37 Suppl C():125-31. PubMed ID: 8818853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Treatment of pharyngitis and tonsillitis with cefprozil: review of three multicenter trials.
    McCarty JM; Renteria A
    Clin Infect Dis; 1992 Jun; 14 Suppl 2():S224-30; discussion S231-2. PubMed ID: 1617042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy and safety of cefprozil versus other beta-lactam antibiotics in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections.
    Ball P
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1994 Oct; 13(10):851-6. PubMed ID: 7889959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative studies of cefprozil in the management of skin and soft-tissue infections.
    Nolen T
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1994 Oct; 13(10):866-71. PubMed ID: 7889961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of cefprozil and cefaclor for treatment of acute urinary tract infections in women.
    Iravani A
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1991 Sep; 35(9):1940-2. PubMed ID: 1952874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Treatment of skin and skin structure infections: a comparative study of Augmentin and cefaclor.
    Parish LC; Aten EM
    Cutis; 1984 Dec; 34(6):567-70. PubMed ID: 6394217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative efficacy and safety of cefprozil and cefaclor in the treatment of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections.
    Christenson JC; Gooch WM; Herrod JN; Swenson E
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1991 Oct; 28(4):581-6. PubMed ID: 1761453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Clinical evaluation of cefpodoxime proxetil in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections. A double blind comparison of cefpodoxime proxetil and cefaclor].
    Yura J; Shinagawa N; Mizuno A; Watanabe S; Ando M; Sakai K; Ueda T; Morimoto K; Nakamura T; Hashimoto I
    Jpn J Antibiot; 1988 Oct; 41(10):1517-37. PubMed ID: 3060626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical and laboratory studies with cefaclor: efficacy in skin and soft tissue infections.
    Dillon HC; Gray BM; Ware JC
    Postgrad Med J; 1979; 55 Suppl 4():77-81. PubMed ID: 548944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Loracarbef (LY163892) versus cefaclor in the treatment of acute bacterial bronchitis.
    Dere WH; Farlow D; Therasse DG; Ruoff GE
    Clin Ther; 1992; 14(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 1576625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative efficacy and safety of cefprozil (BMY-28100) and cefaclor in the treatment of acute group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis.
    Christenson JC; Swenson E; Gooch WM; Herrod JN
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1991 Jun; 35(6):1127-30. PubMed ID: 1929253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative efficacy of cefadroxil and cefaclor in the treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections.
    Ballantyne FN
    Clin Ther; 1985; 7(4):487-91. PubMed ID: 4016827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.