These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16386001)

  • 1. Sample sizes needed for specified margins of relative error in the estimates of the repeatability and reproducibility standard deviations.
    McClure FD; Lee JK
    J AOAC Int; 2005; 88(5):1503-10. PubMed ID: 16386001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determining a one-tailed upper limit for future sample relative reproducibility standard deviations.
    McClure FD; Lee JK
    J AOAC Int; 2006; 89(3):797-803. PubMed ID: 16795922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determination of a two-tailed 100(1-alpha)% upper limit on the relative error in the laboratory-to-laboratory standard deviation obtained from an interlaboratory study.
    McClure FD; Lee JK
    J AOAC Int; 2009; 92(5):1593-601. PubMed ID: 19916398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Uncertainties of method performance statistics based on a balanced completely randomized model interlaboratory study.
    McClure FD; Lee JK
    J AOAC Int; 2008; 91(3):660-9. PubMed ID: 18567314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On using an approximate noncentral t-distribution in determining a one-side upper limit for future sample relative reproducibility standard deviations.
    McClure FD; Lee JK
    J AOAC Int; 2007; 90(2):575-81. PubMed ID: 17474527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Procedures for estimating confidence intervals for selected method performance parameters.
    McClure FD; Lee JK
    J AOAC Int; 2001; 84(3):940-6. PubMed ID: 11417657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variances and uncertainties of the sample laboratory-to-laboratory variance (S(L)2) and standard deviation (S(L)) associated with an interlaboratory study.
    McClure FD; Lee JK
    J AOAC Int; 2012; 95(1):244-51. PubMed ID: 22468367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exact one-tailed 100p% upper limits for future sample repeatability relative standard deviations obtained in single- and multilaboratory repeatability studies.
    McClure FD; Lee JK
    J AOAC Int; 2007; 90(6):1701-5. PubMed ID: 18196644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of sample size and bias on the reliability of estimates of error: a comparative study of Dahlberg's formula.
    Springate SD
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21447784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Horwitz ratio (HorRat): A useful index of method performance with respect to precision.
    Horwitz W; Albert R
    J AOAC Int; 2006; 89(4):1095-109. PubMed ID: 16915851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incorporating the rotational setup uncertainty into the planning target volume margin expansion for the single isocenter for multiple targets technique.
    Chang J
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2018; 8(6):475-483. PubMed ID: 30033144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A statistical evaluation of the Youden Matched-Pairs Procedure.
    McClure FD
    J AOAC Int; 1999; 82(2):375-83. PubMed ID: 10191544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A statistical model for analyzing the rotational error of single isocenter for multiple targets technique.
    Chang J
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2115-2123. PubMed ID: 28382761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improved determination of isolated trans isomers in edible oils by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy using spectral reconstitution.
    Van de Voort FR; Sedman J; Sherazi ST
    J AOAC Int; 2007; 90(2):446-51. PubMed ID: 17474515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Models to estimate overall analytical measurements uncertainty: assumptions, comparisons and applications.
    Rozet E; Rudaz S; Marini RD; Ziémons E; Boulanger B; Hubert P
    Anal Chim Acta; 2011 Sep; 702(2):160-71. PubMed ID: 21839193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sampling almonds for aflatoxin, part I: estimation of uncertainty associated with sampling, sample preparation, and analysis.
    Whitaker TB; Slate AB; Jacobs M; Hurley JM; Adams JG; Giesbrecht FG
    J AOAC Int; 2006; 89(4):1027-34. PubMed ID: 16915840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Liquid chromatographic analysis of vitamin B6 in reconstituted infant formula: collaborative study.
    Mann DL; Ware GM; Bonnin E; Eitenmiller RR; Barna E; Christiansen S; De Borde JL; DeVries J; Gilliland P; Hemmer J; Kalman A; Konings E; Levin D; Salvati L; Woollard D
    J AOAC Int; 2005; 88(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 15759723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Confidence intervals and sample-size calculations for the sisterhood method of estimating maternal mortality.
    Hanley JA; Hagen CA; Shiferaw T
    Stud Fam Plann; 1996; 27(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 8875734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High-precision measurement of mercury isotope ratios in sediments using cold-vapor generation multi-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry.
    Foucher D; Hintelmann H
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2006 Apr; 384(7-8):1470-8. PubMed ID: 16550418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Youden analysis of Karl Fischer titration data from an interlaboratory study determining water in animal feed, grain, and forage.
    Jones FE
    J AOAC Int; 2005; 88(6):1840-1. PubMed ID: 16526470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.