These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16386098)
1. Palm glucose readings compared with fingertip readings under steady and dynamic glycemic conditions, using the OneTouch Ultra Blood Glucose Monitoring System. Kempe KC; Budd D; Stern M; Ellison JM; Saari LA; Adiletto CA; Olin B; Price DA; Horwitz DL Diabetes Technol Ther; 2005 Dec; 7(6):916-26. PubMed ID: 16386098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Alternative site blood glucose testing: a multicenter study. Fedele D; Corsi A; Noacco C; Prisco F; Squatrito S; Torre E; Iafusco D; Errico MK; Toniato R; Nicolucci A; Franciosi M; De Berardis G; Neri L Diabetes Technol Ther; 2003; 5(6):983-9. PubMed ID: 14709201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient perceptions of different lancing sites for self-monitoring of blood glucose: a comparison of fingertip site with palm site using the OneTouch Ultra Blood Glucose Monitoring System. Ito T; Kamoi K; Minagawa S; Kimura K; Kobayashi A J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2010 Jul; 4(4):906-10. PubMed ID: 20663455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical impact of prandial state, exercise, and site preparation on the equivalence of alternative-site blood glucose testing. Bina DM; Anderson RL; Johnson ML; Bergenstal RM; Kendall DM Diabetes Care; 2003 Apr; 26(4):981-5. PubMed ID: 12663560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of skin temperature and testing site on blood glucose measurements taken by a modern blood glucose monitoring device. Haupt A; Berg B; Paschen P; Dreyer M; Häring HU; Smedegaard J; Matthaei S Diabetes Technol Ther; 2005 Aug; 7(4):597-601. PubMed ID: 16120031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy evaluation of contour next compared with five blood glucose monitoring systems across a wide range of blood glucose concentrations occurring in a clinical research setting. Klaff LJ; Brazg R; Hughes K; Tideman AM; Schachner HC; Stenger P; Pardo S; Dunne N; Parkes JL Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Jan; 17(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 25260047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of glucose levels in capillary blood samples obtained from a variety of body sites. Peled N; Wong D; Gwalani SL Diabetes Technol Ther; 2002; 4(1):35-44; discussion 45-7. PubMed ID: 12017418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigation on the accuracy of the blood glucose monitoring device Prestige IQ. Larbig M; Forst T; Mondok A; Forst S; Pfützner A Diabetes Nutr Metab; 2003 Aug; 16(4):257-61. PubMed ID: 14768776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical assessment of the accuracy of blood glucose measurement devices. Pfützner A; Mitri M; Musholt PB; Sachsenheimer D; Borchert M; Yap A; Forst T Curr Med Res Opin; 2012 Apr; 28(4):525-31. PubMed ID: 22435798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Glucose monitoring at the thenar: evaluation of upper dermal blood glucose kinetics during rapid systemic blood glucose changes. Jungheim K; Koschinsky T Horm Metab Res; 2002 Jun; 34(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 12173073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A multicenter study of the accuracy of the One Touch Ultra home glucose meter in children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Research In Children Network (Direcnet) Study Group Diabetes Technol Ther; 2003; 5(6):933-41. PubMed ID: 14709195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Alternate site testing for hemoglobin A1C in children with diabetes. Flores SL Diabetes Educ; 2010; 36(4):623-8. PubMed ID: 20693439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multisite evaluation of a new diabetes self-test for glucose and glycated protein (fructosamine). Edelman SV; Callahan P; Deeb LC Diabetes Technol Ther; 2000; 2(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 11469264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Whole-blood glucose testing at alternate sites: glucose values and hematocrit of capillary blood drawn from fingertip and forearm. Lock JP; Szuts EZ; Malomo KJ; Anagnostopoulos A Diabetes Care; 2002 Feb; 25(2):337-41. PubMed ID: 11815506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy and user performance evaluation of a blood glucose monitoring system. Caswell M; Frank J; Viggiani MT; Pardo S; Dunne N; Warchal-Windham ME; Morin R Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Mar; 17(3):152-8. PubMed ID: 25494048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comprehensive evaluation of the performance of the test strip technology for OneTouch Verio glucose meter systems. Bailey T; Chang A; Rosenblit PD; Jones L; Teft G; Setford S; Mahoney J Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Aug; 14(8):701-9. PubMed ID: 22853721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of CGMS during rapid blood glucose changes in patients with type 1 diabetes. Wilhelm B; Forst S; Weber MM; Larbig M; Pfützner A; Forst T Diabetes Technol Ther; 2006 Apr; 8(2):146-55. PubMed ID: 16734545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical performance of the TRUE2go blood glucose system--a novel integrated system for meter and strips. Kipnes MS; Joseph H; Morris H; Manko J; Bell DE Diabetes Technol Ther; 2009 Oct; 11(10):649-55. PubMed ID: 19821757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical evaluation of the eBsensor hand-held blood glucose monitoring system. Chen CC; Tai DY; Ho P; Lai YK; Lin JJ; Mao SJ; Lin CC; Hsieh YC; Chiang HC; Dai KS Clin Chim Acta; 2007 Feb; 377(1-2):170-3. PubMed ID: 17097079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comprehensive evaluation of strip performance in multiple blood glucose monitoring systems. Katz LB; Macleod K; Grady M; Cameron H; Pfützner A; Setford S Expert Rev Med Devices; 2015 May; 12(3):263-71. PubMed ID: 25702769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]