BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

422 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16386343)

  • 1. An analysis of genetic toxicity, reproductive and developmental toxicity, and carcinogenicity data: I. Identification of carcinogens using surrogate endpoints.
    Matthews EJ; Kruhlak NL; Cimino MC; Benz RD; Contrera JF
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Mar; 44(2):83-96. PubMed ID: 16386343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An analysis of genetic toxicity, reproductive and developmental toxicity, and carcinogenicity data: II. Identification of genotoxicants, reprotoxicants, and carcinogens using in silico methods.
    Matthews EJ; Kruhlak NL; Cimino MC; Benz RD; Contrera JF
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Mar; 44(2):97-110. PubMed ID: 16352383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H
    Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
    Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comprehensive model for reproductive and developmental toxicity hazard identification: I. Development of a weight of evidence QSAR database.
    Matthews EJ; Kruhlak NL; Daniel Benz R; Contrera JF
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Mar; 47(2):115-35. PubMed ID: 17207562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of rodent carcinogens and noncarcinogens using genetic toxicity tests: premises, promises, and performance.
    Zeiger E
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1998 Oct; 28(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 9927558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity utilizing a battery of in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity tests.
    Kim BS; Margolin BH
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 1999; 34(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 10618179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
    Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comprehensive model for reproductive and developmental toxicity hazard identification: II. Construction of QSAR models to predict activities of untested chemicals.
    Matthews EJ; Kruhlak NL; Daniel Benz R; Ivanov J; Klopman G; Contrera JF
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Mar; 47(2):136-55. PubMed ID: 17175082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Short-term tests for defining mutagenic carcinogens.
    Waters MD; Stack HF; Jackson MA
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):499-536. PubMed ID: 10353401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A core in vitro genotoxicity battery comprising the Ames test plus the in vitro micronucleus test is sufficient to detect rodent carcinogens and in vivo genotoxins.
    Kirkland D; Reeve L; Gatehouse D; Vanparys P
    Mutat Res; 2011 Mar; 721(1):27-73. PubMed ID: 21238603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chemicals classified by IARC: their potency in tests for carcinogenicity in rodents and their genotoxicity and acute toxicity.
    McGregor DB
    IARC Sci Publ; 1992; (116):323-52. PubMed ID: 1428089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Structure-activity relationship analysis tools: validation and applicability in predicting carcinogens.
    Mayer J; Cheeseman MA; Twaroski ML
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Feb; 50(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 18023949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The new ISSMIC database on in vivo micronucleus and its role in assessing genotoxicity testing strategies.
    Benigni R; Bossa C; Tcheremenskaia O; Battistelli CL; Crettaz P
    Mutagenesis; 2012 Jan; 27(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 21965461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens III. Appropriate follow-up testing in vivo.
    Kirkland D; Speit G
    Mutat Res; 2008 Jul; 654(2):114-32. PubMed ID: 18585956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An analysis of pharmaceutical experience with decades of rat carcinogenicity testing: support for a proposal to modify current regulatory guidelines.
    Sistare FD; Morton D; Alden C; Christensen J; Keller D; Jonghe SD; Storer RD; Reddy MV; Kraynak A; Trela B; Bienvenu JG; Bjurström S; Bosmans V; Brewster D; Colman K; Dominick M; Evans J; Hailey JR; Kinter L; Liu M; Mahrt C; Marien D; Myer J; Perry R; Potenta D; Roth A; Sherratt P; Singer T; Slim R; Soper K; Fransson-Steen R; Stoltz J; Turner O; Turnquist S; van Heerden M; Woicke J; DeGeorge JJ
    Toxicol Pathol; 2011 Jun; 39(4):716-44. PubMed ID: 21666103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictive models for carcinogenicity and mutagenicity: frameworks, state-of-the-art, and perspectives.
    Benfenati E; Benigni R; Demarini DM; Helma C; Kirkland D; Martin TM; Mazzatorta P; Ouédraogo-Arras G; Richard AM; Schilter B; Schoonen WG; Snyder RD; Yang C
    J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev; 2009 Apr; 27(2):57-90. PubMed ID: 19412856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strengths and limitations of using repeat-dose toxicity studies to predict effects on fertility.
    Dent MP
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Aug; 48(3):241-58. PubMed ID: 17512650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Which rules for assembling short-term test batteries to predict carcinogenicity?
    Benigni R; Giuliani A
    Mol Toxicol; 1987; 1(2-3):143-66. PubMed ID: 3449755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.