297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16387880)
1. The power of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for large-scale parentage inference.
Anderson EC; Garza JC
Genetics; 2006 Apr; 172(4):2567-82. PubMed ID: 16387880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Large-scale parentage inference with SNPs: an efficient algorithm for statistical confidence of parent pair allocations.
Anderson EC
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2012 Nov; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 23152426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using genomic relationship likelihood for parentage assignment.
Grashei KE; Ødegård J; Meuwissen THE
Genet Sel Evol; 2018 May; 50(1):26. PubMed ID: 29776335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Selection and implementation of single nucleotide polymorphism markers for parentage analysis in crossbred cattle population.
Hu LR; Li D; Chu Q; Wang YC; Zhou L; Yu Y; Zhang Y; Zhang SL; Usman T; Xie ZQ; Hou SY; Liu L; Shi WH
Animal; 2021 Jan; 15(1):100066. PubMed ID: 33516033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analytical and statistical consideration on the use of the ISAG-ICAR-SNP bovine panel for parentage control, using the Illumina BeadChip technology: example on the German Holstein population.
Schütz E; Brenig B
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):3. PubMed ID: 25651826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bayesian pedigree inference with small numbers of single nucleotide polymorphisms via a factor-graph representation.
Anderson EC; Ng TC
Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Feb; 107():39-51. PubMed ID: 26450523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. APIS: An auto-adaptive parentage inference software that tolerates missing parents.
Griot R; Allal F; Brard-Fudulea S; Morvezen R; Haffray P; Phocas F; Vandeputte M
Mol Ecol Resour; 2020 Mar; 20(2):579-590. PubMed ID: 31609085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of genotyping errors on parentage exclusion analysis.
Wang J
Mol Ecol; 2010 Nov; 19(22):5061-78. PubMed ID: 20964757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bayesian parentage analysis with systematic accountability of genotyping error, missing data and false matching.
Christie MR; Tennessen JA; Blouin MS
Bioinformatics; 2013 Mar; 29(6):725-32. PubMed ID: 23365409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On marker-based parentage verification via non-linear optimization.
Boerner V
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jun; 49(1):50. PubMed ID: 28619083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relative accuracy of three common methods of parentage analysis in natural populations.
Harrison HB; Saenz-Agudelo P; Planes S; Jones GP; Berumen ML
Mol Ecol; 2013 Feb; 22(4):1158-70. PubMed ID: 23278953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maximum likelihood parentage assignment using quantitative genotypes.
Hamilton MG
Heredity (Edinb); 2021 Jun; 126(6):884-895. PubMed ID: 33692533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An empirical comparison of SNPs and microsatellites for parentage and kinship assignment in a wild sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) population.
Hauser L; Baird M; Hilborn R; Seeb LW; Seeb JE
Mol Ecol Resour; 2011 Mar; 11 Suppl 1():150-61. PubMed ID: 21429171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A bioinformatic pipeline for identifying informative SNP panels for parentage assignment from RADseq data.
Andrews KR; Adams JR; Cassirer EF; Plowright RK; Gardner C; Dwire M; Hohenlohe PA; Waits LP
Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 Nov; 18(6):1263-1281. PubMed ID: 29870119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Parentage and sibship exclusions: higher statistical power with more family members.
Wang J
Heredity (Edinb); 2007 Aug; 99(2):205-17. PubMed ID: 17487215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Testing for association with a case-parents design in the presence of genotyping errors.
Morris RW; Kaplan NL
Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Feb; 26(2):142-54. PubMed ID: 14748014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The aunt and uncle effect: an empirical evaluation of the confounding influence of full sibs of parents on pedigree reconstruction.
Olsen JB; Busack C; Britt J; Bentzen P
J Hered; 2001; 92(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 11447239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A coalescent-based method for population tree inference with haplotypes.
Wu Y
Bioinformatics; 2015 Mar; 31(5):691-8. PubMed ID: 25344500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The potential costs of accounting for genotypic errors in molecular parentage analyses.
Morrissey MB; Wilson AJ
Mol Ecol; 2005 Nov; 14(13):4111-21. PubMed ID: 16262862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. FRANz: reconstruction of wild multi-generation pedigrees.
Riester M; Stadler PF; Klemm K
Bioinformatics; 2009 Aug; 25(16):2134-9. PubMed ID: 19202194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
