These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16387880)

  • 41. A high throughput single nucleotide polymorphism multiplex assay for parentage assignment in New Zealand sheep.
    Clarke SM; Henry HM; Dodds KG; Jowett TW; Manley TR; Anderson RM; McEwan JC
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e93392. PubMed ID: 24740141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data under polygamy.
    Wang J; Santure AW
    Genetics; 2009 Apr; 181(4):1579-94. PubMed ID: 19221199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Performing Parentage Analysis in the Presence of Inbreeding and Null Alleles.
    Huang K; Mi R; Dunn DW; Wang T; Li B
    Genetics; 2018 Dec; 210(4):1467-1481. PubMed ID: 30337340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Genetic tests for estimating dairy breed proportion and parentage assignment in East African crossbred cattle.
    Strucken EM; Al-Mamun HA; Esquivelzeta-Rabell C; Gondro C; Mwai OA; Gibson JP
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Sep; 49(1):67. PubMed ID: 28899355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Parentage analysis with genetic markers in natural populations. I. The expected proportion of offspring with unambiguous paternity.
    Chakraborty R; Meagher TR; Smouse PE
    Genetics; 1988 Mar; 118(3):527-36. PubMed ID: 3163316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The impact of missing and erroneous genotypes on tagging SNP selection and power of subsequent association tests.
    Liu W; Zhao W; Chase GA
    Hum Hered; 2006; 61(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 16557026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. DNA-based paternity analysis and genetic evaluation in a large, commercial cattle ranch setting.
    Van Eenennaam AL; Weaber RL; Drake DJ; Penedo MC; Quaas RL; Garrick DJ; Pollak EJ
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Dec; 85(12):3159-69. PubMed ID: 17878282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Statistical confidence in parentage analysis with incomplete sampling: how many loci and offspring are needed?
    Neff BD; Repka J; Gross MR
    Mol Ecol; 2000 May; 9(5):529-39. PubMed ID: 10792697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Pedigree reconstruction from SNP data: parentage assignment, sibship clustering and beyond.
    Huisman J
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Sep; 17(5):1009-1024. PubMed ID: 28271620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Genetic evaluation using parentage information from genetic markers.
    Dodds KG; Tate ML; Sise JA
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Oct; 83(10):2271-9. PubMed ID: 16160036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Single nucleotide polymorphisms for DNA typing in the domestic horse.
    Holl HM; Vanhnasy J; Everts RE; Hoefs-Martin K; Cook D; Brooks SA; Carpenter ML; Bustamante CD; Lafayette C
    Anim Genet; 2017 Dec; 48(6):669-676. PubMed ID: 28901559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Exploring the efficacy of paternity and kinship testing based on single nucleotide polymorphisms.
    Mo SK; Liu YC; Wang SQ; Bo XC; Li Z; Chen Y; Ni M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():161-168. PubMed ID: 26952733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Large-scale parentage analysis reveals reproductive patterns and heritability of spawn timing in a hatchery population of steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss).
    Abadía-Cardoso A; Anderson EC; Pearse DE; Garza JC
    Mol Ecol; 2013 Sep; 22(18):4733-46. PubMed ID: 23962061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Development of novel SNP system for individual and pedigree control in a Japanese Black cattle population using whole-genome genotyping assay.
    Hara K; Kon Y; Sasazaki S; Mukai F; Mannen H
    Anim Sci J; 2010 Aug; 81(4):506-12. PubMed ID: 20662822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Bayesian inference of phylogenetic networks from bi-allelic genetic markers.
    Zhu J; Wen D; Yu Y; Meudt HM; Nakhleh L
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Jan; 14(1):e1005932. PubMed ID: 29320496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Genotype probabilities of pairs of individuals for X-chromosome markers.
    Toni C; Domenici R; Presciuttini S
    Transfusion; 2007 Jul; 47(7):1276-80. PubMed ID: 17581164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Simple and efficient analysis of disease association with missing genotype data.
    Lin DY; Hu Y; Huang BE
    Am J Hum Genet; 2008 Feb; 82(2):444-52. PubMed ID: 18252224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Computationally efficient sibship and parentage assignment from multilocus marker data.
    Wang J
    Genetics; 2012 May; 191(1):183-94. PubMed ID: 22367033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evaluation of parentage testing accuracy of child trafficking cases: Combining the exclusion probability and likelihood ratio approaches.
    Yu K; Fung WK
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 May; 34():81-87. PubMed ID: 29428891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Using blocks of linked single nucleotide polymorphisms as highly polymorphic genetic markers for parentage analysis.
    Jones B; Walsh D; Werner L; Fiumera A
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2009 Mar; 9(2):487-97. PubMed ID: 21564678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.