198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16388833)
1. Informativeness of genetic markers for pairwise relationship and relatedness inference.
Wang J
Theor Popul Biol; 2006 Nov; 70(3):300-21. PubMed ID: 16388833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating pairwise relatedness from dominant genetic markers.
Wang J
Mol Ecol; 2004 Oct; 13(10):3169-78. PubMed ID: 15367129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Triadic IBD coefficients and applications to estimating pairwise relatedness.
Wang J
Genet Res; 2007 Jun; 89(3):135-53. PubMed ID: 17894908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ex situ population management in the absence of pedigree information.
Russello MA; Amato G
Mol Ecol; 2004 Sep; 13(9):2829-40. PubMed ID: 15315693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multilocus estimation of pairwise relatedness with dominant markers.
Ritland K
Mol Ecol; 2005 Sep; 14(10):3157-65. PubMed ID: 16101781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new method to estimate relatedness from molecular markers.
Fernández J; Toro MA
Mol Ecol; 2006 May; 15(6):1657-67. PubMed ID: 16629818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Resolving relationship tests that show ambiguous STR results using autosomal SNPs as supplementary markers.
Phillips C; Fondevila M; García-Magariños M; Rodriguez A; Salas A; Carracedo A; Lareu MV
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jun; 2(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 19083821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Most recent common ancestor probability distributions in gene genealogies under selection.
Slade PF
Theor Popul Biol; 2000 Dec; 58(4):291-305. PubMed ID: 11162788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A clustering algorithm using DNA marker information for sub-pedigree reconstruction.
Cowell RG; Mostad P
J Forensic Sci; 2003 Nov; 48(6):1239-48. PubMed ID: 14640266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A classifier for the SNP-based inference of ancestry.
Frudakis T; Venkateswarlu K; Thomas MJ; Gaskin Z; Ginjupalli S; Gunturi S; Ponnuswamy V; Natarajan S; Nachimuthu PK
J Forensic Sci; 2003 Jul; 48(4):771-82. PubMed ID: 12877291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genotype probabilities of pairs of individuals for X-chromosome markers.
Toni C; Domenici R; Presciuttini S
Transfusion; 2007 Jul; 47(7):1276-80. PubMed ID: 17581164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantifying the amount of missing information in genetic association studies.
Nicolae DL
Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 30(8):703-17. PubMed ID: 16986163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microsatellite DNA markers: evaluating their potential for estimating the proportion of hatchery-reared offspring in a stock enhancement programme.
Bravington MV; Ward RD
Mol Ecol; 2004 May; 13(5):1287-97. PubMed ID: 15078464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Linkage analysis for complex diseases: a new life for an old method].
Rebaï A
Arch Inst Pasteur Tunis; 2000; 77(1-4):25-35. PubMed ID: 14658225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simulation of selected genealogies.
Slade PF
Theor Popul Biol; 2000 Feb; 57(1):35-49. PubMed ID: 10708627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inferring unknown genotypes of sires at codominant deoxyribonucleic acid markers in half-sib families.
Gomez-Raya L
J Anim Sci; 2009 Jun; 87(6):1872-82. PubMed ID: 19251934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Similarity coefficients for molecular markers in studies of genetic relationships between individuals for haploid, diploid, and polyploid species.
Kosman E; Leonard KJ
Mol Ecol; 2005 Feb; 14(2):415-24. PubMed ID: 15660934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Do marker-based paternity assignments favour heterozygous and unrelated males?
Wang J
Mol Ecol; 2010 May; 19(9):1898-913. PubMed ID: 20345688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Demerelate: calculating interindividual relatedness for kinship analysis based on codominant diploid genetic markers using R.
Kraemer P; Gerlach G
Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Nov; 17(6):1371-1377. PubMed ID: 28281323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the Genplex SNP typing system and a 49plex forensic marker panel.
Phillips C; Fang R; Ballard D; Fondevila M; Harrison C; Hyland F; Musgrave-Brown E; Proff C; Ramos-Luis E; Sobrino B; Carracedo A; Furtado MR; Syndercombe Court D; Schneider PM;
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Jun; 1(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 19083752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
